不同书面纠错反馈方式对大学生英语写作语法能力的影响

发布时间：2018-05-27 17:05

本文选题：聚焦直接反馈 + 聚焦间接反馈　；参考：《中北大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,纠正性反馈在二语写作中的影响成为热议,学术界围绕其有效性以及哪一种反馈方式更有效提出很多观点,并做了一系列实证研究,然而尚无明确答案,相比较国外的此类研究国内略显不足。尽管一些学者对不同类型的书面反馈在英语写作中发挥的影响提出过自己的观点,但针对不同的反馈方式在语法能力方面的研究却寥寥无几。为了近一步探究不同书面纠正性反馈方式对大学生英语写作中语法能力的影响,本文研究了聚焦直接与间接书面纠正性反馈分别对高、低水平大学生英语写作中语法能力的影响,选取了太原工业学院的非英语专业的80名大一新生为研究对象,历时一学期。研究懫用测试、实验及问卷调查等研究工具,试图通过比较这两种反馈方式寻找能够提高学生写作语法能力教学纠错方式。研究结果表明:1)聚焦直接反馈及聚焦间接反馈均对高低两种写作水平的学习者写作语法能力都有明显提高,且两种反馈方式对低水平学生来说更有效;2)两种反馈方式在进行一学期后相比较,并无显著差异,但是通过比较前后测均值差值,发现聚焦直接反馈略优于聚焦间接反馈;3)学生对反馈普遍持肯定态度,且更希望在今后学习中得到全面综合性的直接反馈。本研究为证实纠正性反馈有效性以及何种反馈方式对提高英语语法能力的研究更有效提供了经验,丰富了前人研究。此外,对今后改善我国大学生英语作文教学提供了一些启示。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the influence of corrective feedback on second language writing has become a hot topic. The academic circles have put forward a lot of views on its effectiveness and which way of feedback is more effective, and have done a series of empirical studies. However, there is no clear answer. Compared with foreign research, this kind of research is a little insufficient in our country. Although some scholars have put forward their own views on the influence of different types of written feedback on English writing, there are few studies on the grammatical competence of different forms of feedback. In order to further explore the effect of different written corrective feedback on the grammatical ability of college students in English writing, this paper studies the effects of direct and indirect written corrective feedback on English writing. Based on the influence of grammar ability in English writing, 80 freshmen of non-English major in Taiyuan Institute of Technology were selected as the subjects of the study, which lasted for one semester. By comparing the two kinds of feedback methods, the author tries to find out how to improve the students' writing grammar ability by using the tools of test, experiment and questionnaire. The results show that both direct and indirect focussing feedback can significantly improve learners' writing grammar ability in both high and low levels of writing. And the two ways of feedback are more effective for the low level students. (2) there is no significant difference between the two ways of feedback after one semester, but the difference of the mean value before and after the comparison is not significant. It is found that focusing direct feedback is a little better than focusing indirect feedback 3) students generally hold positive attitude towards feedback and hope to get comprehensive direct feedback in future study. This study provides experience to verify the effectiveness of corrective feedback and what feedback methods are more effective in improving English grammar competence, and enriches previous studies. In addition, it provides some enlightenment to improve the English composition teaching of college students in China in the future.
【学位授予单位】：中北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H319.3

【参考文献】