南北朝隋—唐五代“看”类动词语义场的演变研究
本文选题:语义场 + “看” ; 参考:《郑州大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:本文以南北朝隋至唐五代时期的“看”类动词为研究对象,从“语义场”理论的角度,对这一时期的“看”类动词进行定量统计和定性分析。并运用共时考察与历时比较相结合的方法,梳理和描写这一阶段“看”类动词语义场的各个成员,以此进一步归纳这些成员自南北朝隋至唐五代的发展演变轨迹。全文分别对南北朝隋及唐五代这两个阶段进行考察。选取各自历史阶段口语性较强的优质语料,对这些代表性文献中,表达“观看”即“以视线接触具体或抽象事物”这一行为概念的词语进行调查和统计,并对其在语料中的具体应用情况做以描写和分析。同时,将两个时期“看”类动词语义场中的成员进行历时比较,从语义特征、用法功能、组合形式、使用频率、分布地位等层面,考察各成员从南北朝隋到唐五代的更替变化情况,以探求“看”类动词语义场在南北朝隋至唐五代时期发展演变的特点和原因。具体而言,文章大致从以下四个层面展开。首先,在理论方法层面,文章阐明了“看”类动词语义场的研究背景和意义,对“看”类动词的范围进行了界定,确立了考察的内容和对象,阐述了研究的方法及目标,并说明了语料的选取,研究的难点和创新点等问题。其二,在横向考察方面,本文对语义场各成员的使用情况进行了共时描写。文章依次对南北朝隋和唐五代两个时期的“看”类动词做以考察,调查和分析了语义场成员在各时期的语义特征、出现频次、用法功能、成词能力、分布地位等具体情况。并特别对南北朝隋时期北方与南方的语义场进行了比较,从各自入场成员的不同,及成员分布地位的不同这两个角度出发,分析了这一时期南北语义场的地域差异。其三,在纵向考察方面,文章对语义场各成员的发展演变进行了历时梳理。本文对南北朝隋和唐五代这两个时期的“看”类动词集合进行了对比与分析,展现了自南北朝隋至唐五代,语义场内部的继承与延续,丰富和发展,及退化与衰落。最后,在宏观规律层面,本文归纳了“看”类动词语义场历时演变的特点和原因。文章梳理了“看”类动词语义场在南北朝隋至唐五代时期的演变过程,从核心词的更替,复音化的趋势,组合形式的演变这三个方面,归纳了其历时发展的特征和规律。并从表意功能的需求,语言接触的影响,文言分离的制约,以及词汇系统的内部调整等方面,阐释了该语义场在南北朝隋至唐五代阶段发展演变的原因。从“语义场”理论的角度,对南北朝隋及唐五代的“看”类动词进行共时考察和历时比较,不仅能让我们清晰地认识“看”类动词语义场在这一阶段发展演变的动态轨迹,也能进一步展现“语义场”理论对汉语词汇研究的重要意义。
[Abstract]:This paper takes the "see" verbs from the Sui Dynasty to the Tang and the five dynasties of the Northern and Southern dynasties as the object of study. From the perspective of the theory of "semantic field", this paper makes quantitative statistics and qualitative analysis on the "see" verbs of this period. Using the method of synchronic investigation and diachronic comparison, this paper combs and describes the members of the semantic field of "look" verbs in this stage, and further sums up the development and evolution of these members from the Sui Dynasty to the Tang and the five dynasties of the Southern and Northern dynasties. The full text of the Southern and Northern dynasties Sui and Tang and five dynasties to investigate the two stages. In this paper, we select the high quality oral materials of each historical stage, and investigate and count the words that express the concept of "watching", that is, "contact concrete or abstract things with sight" in these representative literature. And its specific application in the corpus to do a description and analysis. At the same time, the diachronic comparison of the members in the semantic field of "look" verbs in the two periods is made from the semantic features, usage functions, combination forms, frequency of use, distribution status, and so on. In order to find out the characteristics and reasons of the semantic field of the verb "look" from Sui Dynasty to the five dynasties of Tang Dynasty and Northern Dynasty, this paper investigates the changes of the members from the Sui Dynasty to the five dynasties of the Tang Dynasty in order to find out the characteristics and reasons for the development and evolution of the semantic field. Specifically, the article from the following four levels. First of all, at the theoretical and methodological level, the paper clarifies the research background and significance of the semantic field of "see" verbs, defines the scope of "see" verbs, establishes the contents and objects of investigation, and expounds the methods and objectives of the research. It also explains the selection of corpus, the difficulties and innovations of the research. Secondly, in the aspect of horizontal investigation, this paper describes the usage of the members of semantic field in a synchronic way. This paper investigates the semantic features, frequency, usage function, word-forming ability and distribution status of the members of the semantic field in the Sui Dynasty and the Tang Dynasty and the five dynasties of the Southern and Northern dynasties in order to investigate and analyze the semantic characteristics, frequency, usage function, ability of word formation, and distribution status of the members of the semantic field in each period of the Sui Dynasty and the Tang Dynasty. In particular, this paper compares the semantic fields between the north and the south in the Sui Dynasty of the Southern and Northern dynasties, and analyzes the regional differences of the semantic fields between the north and the south in this period from the two angles of the difference of the entry members and the distribution status of the members. Thirdly, in the aspect of longitudinal investigation, the article sorts out the evolution of the members of semantic field in a diachronic way. This paper compares and analyzes the collection of "look" verbs in the Sui and Tang dynasties of the Southern and Northern dynasties, and shows the inheritance and continuation, enrichment and development, and degradation and decline of the semantic field from Sui Dynasty to Tang Dynasty. Finally, at the macro level, this paper summarizes the characteristics and causes of the diachronic evolution of the semantic field of "look" verbs. This paper combs the evolution process of semantic field of "look" verbs from Sui Dynasty to Tang Dynasty, summarizes the characteristics and rules of its diachronic development from three aspects: the replacement of the core words, the trend of polyphonation and the evolution of the combination form. From the aspects of the demand of ideographic function, the influence of language contact, the restriction of the separation of classical Chinese and the internal adjustment of the lexical system, the reasons for the development and evolution of the semantic field in the period of Sui Dynasty to Tang Dynasty and five dynasties of the Southern and Northern dynasties are explained. From the angle of "semantic field" theory, the synchronic investigation and diachronic comparison of the "see" verbs of the Sui Dynasty and the five dynasties of the Southern and Northern dynasties can not only make us understand clearly the dynamic track of the development and evolution of the semantic field of the "look" verb at this stage. It can also further demonstrate the significance of semantic field theory to the study of Chinese vocabulary.
【学位授予单位】:郑州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:H139
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 齐广军;俄汉分类语义场对比[J];俄语学习;2001年06期
2 郝艳萍;;浅析俄语反义语义场中的形容词[J];齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年01期
3 霍生玉;陈建初;;语义场的古今演变——对“吃喝”义场演变轨迹的探析[J];求索;2009年08期
4 张雪;刘清娟;;语义场框架下对汉字“升”的研究[J];大学英语(学术版);2010年01期
5 李雅莉;;框架语义模式与语义场在词义区分中的异同[J];海外英语;2010年04期
6 孙琳琳;;浅谈语义场及其应用[J];赤峰学院学报(科学教育版);2011年03期
7 王悦;;俄语语义场划分的原则与类型[J];经济研究导刊;2012年14期
8 陆尊梧;语义场浅谈[J];学习与思考(中国社会科学院研究生院学报);1981年05期
9 Б.И.Косовский;成立中;;研究语义场的数量方法[J];国外语言学;1982年04期
10 梅家驹 ,竺一鸣 ,高蕴琦 ,殷鸿翔;语义场和语义体系[J];外国语(上海外国语学院学报);1987年03期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 董建民;;英汉经贸词语语义域对比[A];语言与文化研究(第十一辑)[C];2013年
2 王幼明;孟利魁;李长利;;NBA语言中的词汇语义场研究[A];第九届全国体育科学大会论文摘要汇编(4)[C];2011年
3 吴哲;;论俄语词汇-语义体系的层级结构单位[A];外语语言教学研究——黑龙江省外国语学会第十次学术年会论文集[C];1996年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 苏州大学教授,博士生导师,,演讲人 鲁枢元;奇特的汉字“风”[N];光明日报;2012年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 解海江;汉语编码度研究[D];厦门大学;2004年
2 姜兴鲁;竺法护译经感觉动词语义场研究[D];浙江大学;2011年
3 吴林静;基于语义场模型的学科资源聚类及应用研究[D];华中师范大学;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 王雪蓉;南北朝隋—唐五代“看”类动词语义场的演变研究[D];郑州大学;2017年
2 孟和珠拉;汉蒙常用饮食动词的比较研究[D];内蒙古大学;2015年
3 张晓丽;“停止”类动词语义场的历时演变[D];内蒙古大学;2015年
4 陈柳;东汉“行走”语义场及演变研究[D];西南交通大学;2015年
5 赵娜;语义场在科技英语“次技术词”翻译中的应用[D];南京理工大学;2015年
6 李珍玲;审美语素“逸”的语义分析[D];福建师范大学;2015年
7 翟希钰;汉语“愤怒”类语义场核心动词演变研究[D];广西师范学院;2015年
8 龚赞;从功能语法角度研究现代俄语中表原因意义的结构(兼与汉语对比)[D];湖南师范大学;2015年
9 李秀雅;副词“倒”“并”“也”的篇章语义研究[D];华东师范大学;2016年
10 赵琳琳;手部“擦拭”义动词历时演变研究[D];华中师范大学;2016年
本文编号:1994606
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiboshi/1994606.html