礼貌视阙下中美政治建议言语行为对比研究

发布时间：2020-12-26 00:44

　　建议是说话人言及对听话人有利的指令性言语,对维护和促进交际双方的社会关系有重要作用。前人对建议言语行为的研究多聚焦于日常话语中建议言语行为的分类、策略及其语言特征等,而对机构话语中建议言语行为的语言实现形式及其所蕴含的动因未做深入探讨。本研究以中美外交部官方发言人在正式政治场合中的真实话语为语料,自建中美政治话语语料库,分别对中美政治建议言语行为的言外之力指示手段及策略进行定量分析。在此基础上,本研究分别从礼貌的语言语用与社会语用(Leech,2014)两个维度对中美政治建议言语行为的异同进行质性分析,旨在进一步揭示其深层次语用理据。研究发现:1)在言外之力指示手段方面,中国政治建议主要通过“间接建议”实现,如“暗示”、“无人称”及“间接施为动词”等;而美国政治建议主要采取“规约建议”,如“特定程式”、“可能性”及“条件句”等。2)在策略方面,中美政治建议都强调“听话人主导”且伴有“补救策略”;而在“隐性主导”、“规约间接”及“无补救策略”等层面,中美两国政治建议均存在显著性差异。3)本研究进一步从敬语形式、情态动词、自称转换等礼貌的语言语用维度与垂直距离、水平距离以及交际的权衡等社会... 

【文章来源】：大连外国语大学辽宁省

【文章页数】：89 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
ABSTRACT
摘要
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Background of the research
    1.2 Significance of the research
    1.3 Objective of the research
    1.4 Structure of the thesis
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 Previous research on the speech act of advising
        2.1.1 Identifications of the speech act of advising
        2.1.2 Research concerns of the speech act of advising
        2.1.3 Research approaches to the speech act of advising
    2.2 Previous research on political speech act of advising
        2.2.1 Identification of political speech act of advising
        2.2.2 Properties of political speech act of advising
    2.3 Theoretical approaches to the research
        2.3.1 Pragmalinguistic facet of politeness
        2.3.2 Sociopragmatic facet of politeness
CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
    3.1 Research questions
    3.2 Research method
    3.3 Corpus used
    3.4 Procedures for data collection and analysis
CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    4.1 IFIDs in Chinese and American political speech act of advising
        4.1.1 IFIDs in Chinese political speech act of advising
        4.1.2 IFIDs in American political speech act of advising
    4.2 Strategies in Chinese and American political speech act of advising
        4.2.1 Similarities in Chinese and American political speech act of advising
        4.2.2 Differences in Chinese and American political speech act of advising
    4.3 Underlying causes behind the contrastive results
        4.3.1 In the pragmalinguistic politeness facet
            4.3.1.1 Honorific forms
            4.3.1.2 Modal verbs
            4.3.1.3 Varied “self”
        4.3.2 In the sociopragmatic politeness facet
            4.3.2.1 Vertical distance
            4.3.2.2 Horizontal distance
            4.3.2.3 Weightness of the transaction
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Theoretical and practical implications
    5.3 Limitations and suggestions for further research
REFERENCES


【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]建议类言外构式的转喻操作[J]. 李秀娟,董艳.  中北大学学报(社会科学版). 2018(01)
[2]中美政治道歉言语行为对比研究[J]. 刘风光,邓耀臣,肇迎如.  外语与外语教学. 2016(06)
[3]网络语境下建议行为的语用机制研究[J]. 毛延生,黄倩倩.  语言教学与研究. 2016(03)
[4]霸权国与其他主要大国关系研究——以二战后历史为例[J]. 肖河.  世界经济与政治. 2016(03)
[5]国外英语学术期刊论文中建议话语的身份建构——一项实证研究[J]. 何荷.  外语教学理论与实践. 2016(01)
[6]学术互动中权势关系建构的语用分析[J]. 任育新.  现代外语. 2015(02)
[7]政治话语研究——俄语语言研究的新方向[J]. 蒋春丽,杨可.  广东外语外贸大学学报. 2013(06)
[8]汉语学术互动中的建议话语序列特征研究[J]. 任育新.  暨南学报(哲学社会科学版). 2013(03)
[9]产前检查中建议序列的会话分析研究[J]. 于国栋.  外国语(上海外国语大学学报). 2009(01)
[10]使命感与美国外交理念——一种宗教视角的分析[J]. 杨卫东.  东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版). 2007(02)



本文编号：2938699