短语、口号能否构成作品——以“兰州—西宁经济区”著作权纠纷案为例

发布时间：2018-01-30 02:13

本文关键词： 著作权公有领域短语词汇利益平衡　出处：《中国版权》2014年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：著作权制度的宗旨是保护著作权人合法权益以促进文学艺术的创作繁荣,推动社会文明进步。遵循利益平衡原则,在法律的框架下保护著作权人利益,避免著作权向公有领域扩张,因此应依法确定著作权的客体范围,对于短语、口号、词汇等公有领域的元素不予著作权保护,确有独创性的作品标题、广告语可以纳入反不正当竞争法保护或作为作品保护,但应严格确定受保护的条件。
[Abstract]:The aim of copyright system is to protect the legitimate rights and interests of copyright owners, to promote the creation and prosperity of literature and art, to promote the progress of social civilization, to follow the principle of balance of interests and to protect the interests of copyright owners under the framework of law. To avoid the expansion of copyright to the public domain, the scope of the object of copyright should be determined according to law, and the elements in the public domain, such as phrases, slogans, vocabulary and so on, should not be protected by copyright, and there are indeed original titles of works. Advertising language can be protected by anti-unfair competition law or as work protection, but the conditions of protection should be strictly determined.
【作者单位】：西北政法大学;
【分类号】：D923.41;D920.5
【正文快照】： 基本案情:原告一直从事区域经济研究,曾在一些报刊发表了设立“兰州——西宁经济区”的文章。2O11年3月25日《青海日报》报道,由当地某民主党派提出的设立“兰州一西宁经济区”的提案被列入国家“十二五”规划纲要。此文发表后,原告遂与某民主党派交涉,主张“兰州一西宁经济区

【参考文献】