法律庭审互动中语用预设研究

发布时间：2024-04-18 04:41

　　预设的概念源于哲学、逻辑学,但对预设研究最多、最热情的是语言学界。目前有关预设的相关研究已经取得了诸多成果,但对某些特殊领域的语用预设现象的研究还比较少。有研究者对庭审中的语用预设现象做了研究,但其中大多数的研究停留在庭审中双方律师在询问中对语用预设交际策略的表层形式的描述上。事实上,在庭审过程中使用预设策略的不仅仅是律师,包括法官、公诉人和庭审中的当事人都会使用预设。鉴于法庭庭审问答是具有冲突性的、以目的为导向的言语行为,对法庭庭审互动中的预设进行认知语用解释有着很大的必要性。 本文尝试从认知语用的角度,运用斯波伯和威尔逊的关联理论,通过对一些庭审案例中语用预设现象的分析,应用描述和阐释相结合的方法对在庭审中语用预设的生成、理解、特点以及作用将做详细、深入的分析、研究。从而帮助人们更深入认识和理解法庭庭审互动中的预设现象,也为预设研究提供新的视角。 本研究尝试用语用预设的关联理论模式来解释中国法律庭审互动中语用预设的生成、特点以及语用预设的取消。本研究采用定性分析的方法对语料做了分析和阐释。本研究所用语料收集于兰州中级人民法院民事案件的庭审记录。通过对八小时多录音的撰写,用2,200...

【文章页数】：69 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
Abstract
内容摘要
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Rationale of the Study
    1.2 Research Objective, Method and Data
    1.3 Significance and Feasibility of the Study
    1.4 Layout of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Relevance Studies on Courtroom Trial
        2.1.1 A Brief Introduction of Forensic Linguistics
        2.1.2 Relevant Studies on Courtroom Discourse
    2.2 Relevant Studies on Presupposition
        2.2.1 Philosophical Background
        2.2.2 Definitions of Presupposition
        2.2.3 Presupposition Researches in Linguistic Field
            2.2.3.1 Presupposition Researches in Semantics
            2.2.3.2 Presupposition Researches in Pragmatics
            2.2.3.3 Presupposition Researches in Cognitive Linguistics
    2.3 Studies on Presupposition in Legal Context
        2.3.1 Studies of Presupposition in Courtroom Interaction Abroad
        2.3.2 Current Studies at Home
        2.3.3 A Brief Comment on the Researches at Home and Abroad
    2.4 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
    3.1 A Brief Introduction of Relevance Theory
    3.2 Some Basic Concepts in Relevance Theory
        3.2.1 Assumption
        3.2.2 Cognitive Environment and Mutual Manifestness
        3.2.3 Ostensive-inferential Communication and Informative and Communicative Intentions
        3.2.4 Optimal Relevance
    3.3 A Cognitive-pragmatic Account of Presupposition
        3.3.1 A Relevance-theoretical Model of Presupposition
        3.3.2 A Relevance-theoretical Explanation of Presupposition
            3.3.2.1.P resupposition and Cognitive Environment
            3.3.2.2 Pragmatic Presupposition and Ostensive-inferential Communication
            3.3.2.3 Pragmatic Presupposition and Expectation of Relevance
        3.3.3 Pragmatic Presupposition and its Defeasibility
    3.4 A Brief Introduction of the Principle of Goal-direction
    3.5 Summary
Chapter Four A Cognitive-Pragmatic Interpretation of Presupposition in Courtroom Interaction
    4.1 Research Questions
    4.2 Research Method
    4.3 Data Collection
    4.4 Data Analysis
        4.4.1 Motivations for a Cognitive-pragmatic Interpretation
        4.4.2 The Generating and Interpretation of Presupposition in Courtroom Interaction
        4.4.3 Features of Presupposition in Courtroom Interaction
        4.4.4 Interpretation of the Defeasibility of Presupposition Traps
    4.5 Summary
Chapter Five Conclusions
    5.1 Summery of the Findings
    5.2 Enlightenment for Linguistics
    5.3 Enlightenment for Judicial Practice
    5.4 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Research
Bibliography
Acknowledgements



本文编号：3957436