泰戈尔“东方—西方”观及“东方文化”论——基于东方学视角的分析
发布时间：2018-11-21 13:11
【摘要】：泰戈尔在关于"东方—西方"的思考中,体现了鲜明的"印度本位"意识。为了应对"西方文化"的迫临,他意识到东方各国文化的分散性而提出了"东方文化"整合论,强调:印度具有强大的宗教文化影响力和多文化融合的特性,因而有条件成为东方文化的中心。他还提出了"东方精神文明"与"西方物质文明"这两个对巂的概念,先是主张两者的融合,进而主张用前者来克服、矫正后者,但他并非一般地反对或否定西方物质文明,而是通过弘扬"东方文化"来强调代表了东方文化的印度文化在道义上的优越,体现出了殖民统治下印度人的一种文化防卫意识。
[Abstract]:Tagore reflected the consciousness of "Indian standard" in his thinking of "East-West". In response to the imminent emergence of "Western culture", he, aware of the fragmentation of the cultures of the Eastern countries, put forward the theory of integration of "Eastern cultures", emphasizing that India has a strong religious and cultural influence and a characteristic of multicultural integration, Therefore, there are conditions to become the center of oriental culture. He also put forward the concepts of "Eastern spiritual Civilization" and "Western material Civilization". First, he advocated the fusion of the two concepts, and then he advocated using the former to overcome and correct the latter, but he did not generally oppose or negate Western material civilization. Instead, it emphasizes the moral superiority of the Indian culture, which represents the oriental culture, and reflects the cultural defense consciousness of the Indians under the colonial rule.
【作者单位】： 北京师范大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“‘东方学’体系建构与中国的东方学研究”(项目批准号:14ZB083)
【分类号】：I351.06
本文编号：2347050
[Abstract]:Tagore reflected the consciousness of "Indian standard" in his thinking of "East-West". In response to the imminent emergence of "Western culture", he, aware of the fragmentation of the cultures of the Eastern countries, put forward the theory of integration of "Eastern cultures", emphasizing that India has a strong religious and cultural influence and a characteristic of multicultural integration, Therefore, there are conditions to become the center of oriental culture. He also put forward the concepts of "Eastern spiritual Civilization" and "Western material Civilization". First, he advocated the fusion of the two concepts, and then he advocated using the former to overcome and correct the latter, but he did not generally oppose or negate Western material civilization. Instead, it emphasizes the moral superiority of the Indian culture, which represents the oriental culture, and reflects the cultural defense consciousness of the Indians under the colonial rule.
【作者单位】： 北京师范大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“‘东方学’体系建构与中国的东方学研究”(项目批准号:14ZB083)
【分类号】：I351.06
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 章辉;;学科·知识·权力——《东方学》的核心命题及其对当前文学批评的启示意义[J];湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年06期
2 麦永雄;全球化语境中东方文化与文学的研究现状与前瞻[J];外国文学评论;2001年04期
，本文编号：2347050
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/xiandaiwenxuelunwen/2347050.html
