奈保尔《自由国度》中人物的存在主义解读

发布时间：2018-03-15 06:31

本文选题：维·苏·奈保尔　切入点：《自由国度》　出处：《西安外国语大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：《自由国度》于1971年为维·苏·奈保尔摘得了布克奖的桂冠。该作以其对殖民社会与后殖民社会犀利的讽刺而闻名于世，，所以评论家多从后殖民理论的角度来阐释该作。文体学、主题研究、空间理论以及比较研究等视角也被应用于对该作的诠释与解读。除以上的研究方法之外，还有评论家从存在主义的视角来分析该作。与其它方法相比，使用该视角的研究较少。但实际上，对于该作的存在主义研究仍有新的可能性。本文尝试运用萨特的绝对自由观与荒诞观对该作提供一种新的解读，对作品中的主要人物进行解读与分析，探讨他们的不同选择,他们所遭遇的种种荒诞以及他们所面对的生存困境。面对生活中的种种荒诞，每位主人公都有自由做出自己的选择，然而选择之后，面对他们的却依旧是荒诞且毫无自由的生活，而他们也必须为自己的选择担负起责任。通过对主要人物存在主义视角的解读，本文试图揭示前殖民地移民与前宗主国殖民者在后殖民时期所共同面对的毫无自由、无根，孤离的生存困境。尽管面对生存困境，主人公对选择的坚持依旧为作品的悲观情绪赋予了美学价值。
[Abstract]:In 1971, Free State won the Booker Prize for David Su Naipaul, known for his sharp satire of colonial and post-colonial societies. Therefore, critics interpret the work from the perspective of postcolonial theory. The perspectives of stylistics, thematic study, spatial theory and comparative study are also applied to the interpretation and interpretation of the work. In addition to the above research methods, There are also critics who analyze the work from an existentialist perspective. There is less research using this perspective than any other method. But in fact, There is still a new possibility in the study of existentialism. This paper attempts to use Sartre's absolute freedom and absurdity to provide a new interpretation of the work, to interpret and analyze the main characters in the works, and to explore their different choices. In the face of the absurdity of life, each hero has the freedom to make his or her own choices. They are still faced with a life of absurdity and lack of freedom, and they must take responsibility for their choices. This paper attempts to reveal the freedom, rootlessness and isolation of the former colonial immigrants and the former Suzerain colonists in the post-colonial period. The protagonist's insistence on choice still gives aesthetic value to the pessimism of the works.
【学位授予单位】：西安外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：I561.06

【相似文献】