全血γ干扰素释放试验在活动性结核中的诊断价值及其影响因素
本文选题:全血γ干扰素释放试验 + 活动性结核 ; 参考:《复旦大学》2014年博士论文
【摘要】:目的:全血γ干扰素释放试验QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-Tube(QFT-GIT)是近年来发展起来的γ干扰素释放试验之一,由于其操作方便,对设备要求低,在国际上被广泛用于辅助活动性结核的诊断,但该试剂盒在国内尚未上市使用,同时年龄、免疫抑制剂或抗结核治疗等因素对检测结果是否有影响仍然存在疑问。本研究比较了在我国这一结核病高发地区,QFT-GIT用于儿童和成人活动性结核的诊断价值,并探讨了激素以及抗结核治疗对其结果的影响。方法:研究入组临床怀疑活动性结核的儿童60名,成人212名,采血进行QFT-GIT检测;同时收集每位患者的临床症状、病原学、病理学、影像学、治疗方案等相关信息,进行诊断分类。比较分析QFT-GIT在儿童和成人中的诊断价值,并探讨检测前接受激素和抗结核治疗对结果的影响。结果:QFT-GIT在儿童中用于诊断活动性结核的灵敏度为83.%(95%CI66.3%-94.6%),特异度为88.5%(95%CI 70.2%-96.8%),阳性预测值为92.9%(95%CI76.5%-99.1%),阴性预测值为82.1%(95%CI 63.1%-93.9%)。在成人中用于诊断活动性结核的灵敏度为73.7%(95%CI 57.8%-85.2%),特异度为70.4%(95%CI62.9%-77.0%),阳性预测值为47.5%(95%CI 35.3%-60.0%),阴性预测值为93.3%(95%CI 87.2%-96.8%)。激素治疗对丝裂原引起的γ干扰素释放会产生抑制作用(P0.05)。在QFT_GIT检测前接受激素治疗的结核患者中,25.0%的儿童出现假阴性结果,28.6%的成人出现不确定结果,而接受抗结核治疗的成人结核患者,有44.4%出现假阴性结果。同时研究还发现,无论在儿童还是成人中,活动性结核患者的丝裂原引起的γ干扰素释放水平均较非活动性结核患者低。结论:QFT-GIT在儿童中用于诊断活动性结核的灵敏度和特异度均高于成人。激素治疗对儿童和成人的检测结果存在负面影响,抗结核治疗会降低检测方法的灵敏度。因此,我们推荐在抗结核治疗开始前进行QFT-GIT检测,并且避免使用于接受过免疫抑制剂如激素治疗的患者。QFT-GIT检测结果的定量分析,对于监测疾病进展过程中机体结核特异性和非特异性免疫水平有重要参考价值。
[Abstract]:Objective: the whole blood interferon 纬 release test (QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-Tubeus QFT-GITT) is one of the developed interferon 纬 release tests in recent years. Because of its convenient operation and low requirements for equipment, it has been widely used in the international diagnosis of active tuberculosis. However, the kit is not yet available in China, and there are still questions about whether age, immunosuppressant or antituberculous therapy have any effect on the test results. This study compared the diagnostic value of QFT-GIT for active tuberculosis in children and adults in this high incidence area of tuberculosis in China, and discussed the effect of hormone and antituberculous therapy on the results. Methods: blood samples were collected from 60 children and 212 adults with suspected active tuberculosis, and their clinical symptoms, etiology, pathology, imaging and treatment plan were collected. Carry out diagnostic classification. To compare and analyze the diagnostic value of QFT-GIT in children and adults, and to explore the effect of hormone and antituberculous therapy before testing. Results the sensitivity for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis in children was 83.95 and the sensitivity was 83.95 and the accuracy was 88.5%(95%CI 70.2-96.8.The positive predictive value was 92.99-95CI76.5-99.1and the negative predictive value was 82.1%(95%CI 63.1- 93.90.The negative predictive value was 63.1- 93.90.The sensitivity was 70.2-96.80.The positive predictive value was 92.99-95CI76.5-99.1C, and the negative predictive value was 82.1%(95%CI 63.1-93.9B. The sensitivity for diagnosis of active tuberculosis in adults was 73.7%(95%CI 57.8-85.2, the specificity was 70.4 and the CI62.9-77.0, the positive predictive value was 47.5%(95%CI 35.3-60.0 and the negative predictive value was 93.3%(95%CI 87.2 -96.80.The positive predictive value was 47.5%(95%CI 35.3-60.0 and the negative predictive value was 93.3%(95%CI 87.2 -96.80.The positive predictive value was 47.5%(95%CI 35.3- 60.0 and the negative predictive value was 93.3%(95%CI 87.2-96.8. Hormone therapy can inhibit the release of interferon 纬 induced by mitogen. Among the tuberculosis patients who received hormone therapy before QFT_GIT test, 25.0% of children had false negative results and 28.6% of adults had uncertain results, while 44.4% of adult TB patients who received anti-tuberculosis treatment had false negative results. It was also found that the release level of IFN- 纬 in active TB patients was lower than that in non-active TB patients, both in children and adults. Conclusion the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of active tuberculosis in children were higher than those in adults. Hormone therapy has a negative effect on the test results in children and adults, and anti-tuberculosis therapy reduces the sensitivity of the test method. Therefore, we recommend that QFT-GIT tests be performed before the start of anti-TB therapy and avoid quantitative analysis of QFT-GIT results in patients who have been treated with immunosuppressants such as hormones. It has important reference value for monitoring the specific and non-specific immune level of tuberculosis in the process of disease progression.
【学位授予单位】:复旦大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:R52
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 曾耀英;;活动性结核对结核菌素反应的进一步观察[J];国外医学参考资料(内科学分册);1976年12期
2 黄元桐;活动性结核的新治疗方案[J];山西医药杂志;1996年06期
3 乔瑛;张燕齐;高海峰;陈红娟;;~(18)F-FDG PET/CT显像对活动性结核的诊断价值21例报告[J];武警后勤学院学报(医学版);2014年08期
4 史太平;陈鸣;胡真;;常州市2005-2011年度活动性结核报告病例流行特征分析[J];中华疾病控制杂志;2012年11期
5 张淑贤,夏来顺;结素试验阳性就是活动性结核吗[J];家庭医学;2002年02期
6 肖彭年,杨翼峰;结素蛋白多肽检测活动性结核[J];徐州医学院学报;1995年01期
7 Wing W.Y.;Kwok C.C.;李开;;中国香港地区学龄儿童中活动性结核的发病风险[J];世界核心医学期刊文摘(儿科学分册);2006年09期
8 陶毓芬;王秀容;;急性单核细胞性白血病并发肺结核后自发缓解八年的一例报告[J];浙江肿瘤通讯;1979年01期
9 刘国成,谢颖光;1TuPPD强阳性对活动性结核的判断观察[J];临床荟萃;1998年21期
10 白汉玉;;这种情况要服抗结核药吗?[J];父母必读;1991年08期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 高孟秋;刘菲;杨新婷;王敬;李澍;;结核免疫学诊断新技术ASACIR.TB在临床诊断中的应用[A];中华医学会结核病学分会2010年学术年会论文汇编[C];2010年
2 卢洪洲;;艾滋病合并结核:进展与挑战[A];中华医学会第四次全国艾滋病、病毒性丙型肝炎暨全国热带病学术会议论文汇编[C];2009年
3 马丽;吴东海;;糖皮质激素治疗与结核病感染[A];全国自身免疫性疾病专题研讨会暨第十一次全国风湿病学学术年会论文汇编[C];2006年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 鲍磊;全血γ干扰素释放试验在活动性结核中的诊断价值及其影响因素[D];复旦大学;2014年
2 高岩;Foxp3+调节性T细胞调控结核发病的免疫机制研究[D];复旦大学;2012年
3 王川;分枝杆菌无机磷酸盐转运相关蛋白PhoY2生物学功能及致病机制研究[D];复旦大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 田恒创;T-SPOT.TB对诊断系统性红斑狼疮合并活动性结核感染的意义[D];河北医科大学;2015年
2 田祺;T-SPOT.TB试验在结核病诊断中的价值[D];河北医科大学;2015年
3 陈典;HIV合并结核感染与HIV合并HPV感染的流行病学与临床研究[D];北京协和医学院;2011年
,本文编号:1823658
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/chuanranbingxuelunwen/1823658.html