肠道病毒71型致神经系统感染的影响因素初步分析
[Abstract]:Background and Objectives: Human Enterovirus 71 (EV71) belongs to the family of small ribonucleoviruses. Enterovirus A (EV71) is one of the main pathogens causing Hand Foot Mouth Disease (HFMD) in infants and young children. Its infection often causes minor clinical symptoms such as hand-foot-mouth disease (HFMD) and herpes angina. A growing number of reports have revealed that EV71 infection can cause severe neurological syndrome, including aseptic meningoencephalitis, brainstem encephalitis, poliomyelitis-like paralysis, neurogenic pulmonary edema, and even death. The virus was first isolated in California, USA, in 1969, and has since been found in Bulgaria, Malaysia, Singapore, etc. As of May 16, 88 366 cases of hand-foot-mouth disease (HFMD) have been reported in Guangdong Province, including 3 deaths, 72% higher than the corresponding number of cases (51 327 cases) in 2015. EV71 is the leading cause of HFMD. First, EV71 has become the most serious central neurotoxic pathogen in the world, replacing poliovirus and threatening public health. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore the influencing factors of nervous system infection caused by EV71 for the prevention and treatment of EV71. VP1 region is considered to be the most significant gene region in the evolution of enterovirus because of its high diversity and less recombination. Studies have shown that VP1 mutation may be associated with nervous system infection. Neurotoxicity of EV71 may be a single site mutation or a combination of multiple site mutations. In the analysis of neurotoxic EV71 isolates, an important amino acid variant Alal 70Val (alanine 170 pi) was found in VP1. It was speculated that the mutation caused structural changes in the protein of the virus. However, this study is based on a small number of mutation sites, and the significance of the mutation site on the pathogenesis of the population is not clear. Therefore, we aim to screen a larger sample of people to verify whether VP1 protein mutation is associated with EV71 infection of the nervous system. In addition, a study on the expression of TLR-5 and TLR-6 receptors in brain tissue and neurological damage caused by EV71 infection found that the high expression of virus receptors in brain tissue was associated with neurological damage. Other studies have also confirmed that EV71 receptors are essential for viral infection of cells and tissues. The first step for viruses to enter cells is with the cell surface. Viral receptors bind to the surface of the virus, and the main way the virus enters the cell is through RNA release or cytophagy mediated by the virus receptor. Therefore, it is speculated that the number of receptors in the patient and the interaction between the virus protein and the receptor may also be related to the infection of the nervous system. The known receptors for EV71 are P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PS-71). GL-1, Human scavenger receptor class B2 (SCARB2), Vimentin (VIM). In recent years, more and more studies have reported that VIM plays an important role in pathogen adsorption, endocytosis and migration. We have reported that the mutation of EV71 virus and the difference of the patient's own receptor may be the factors influencing the infection of EV71 in the nervous system. The two factors either act independently or interact with each other. This paper mainly from 2008 to 2010 in Guangdong Province. Epidemiological analysis of EV71 in 1997 showed that the role of VIM in EV71 infection with HBMEC was related to the factors affecting the nervous system caused by EV71 in order to determine the A289T variation of VP1 protein of EV71 and the relationship between VIM receptor and the infection of EV71 nervous system. This study will not only help to analyze the epidemiological characteristics of EV71 and the variation of EV71 virus, but also establish a meaningful early warning signal for the infection of the nervous system of EV71 virus, early detection of susceptible groups, and timely and effective preventive measures. It is of great significance to reduce the incidence of infection of the nervous system. 2. Research methods 1. Guangdong 200 Epidemiological analysis of EV71 from August to 2010 collected 194 samples (including feces, pharyngeal swabs, cerebrospinal fluid, etc.) from several urban districts of Guangdong Province sent to the Guangdong Center for Disease Control and Prevention for examination (including feces, swabs, cerebrospinal fluid) from 2008 to 2010. Systemic infection group and non-nervous system infection group. RNA was extracted from patients, reverse transcription was used to synthesize cDNA, and full-length VP1 sequence was amplified. Viral typing was determined by comparing VP1 sequence and constructing phylogenetic tree. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of nervous system infection. NAman software translation into protein sequence, defined at the same site, there are more than two amino acids for a mutation. 2. Human brain microvascular endothelial cell VIM knockout cell line established in the United States National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database to find the VIM gene sequence, find the VIM gene CDS region, analyze its gene structure, clear C According to the nature of the gene itself, a pair of DNA Oligos was designed and synthesized to identify the target site. The sgRNA was linked to the Lenti CRISPRv2 vector and the Cas9 plasmid was constructed. The role of VIM in the infection of HBMEC by EV71 was analyzed. The viruses amplified and titrated in RD cells were infected with normal and VIM-KO HBMEC respectively, and the pathological changes of HBMEC were observed. The adsorption, replication and nucleic acid release of EV71 in normal and VIM-KO cells were detected by fluorescence quantitative PCR. At the same time, the difference of VPl protein synthesis between normal HBMEC and VIM-KO cells was detected. 3. Results 1. The main type of EV71 in Guangdong Province from 2008 to 2010 was C4a. During 2008 to 2010, the EV71 strain prevalent in Guangdong Province was C4a, which was also the main prevalent strain in China. In the course of evolution, three families, C4a2-C4a4.2.EV71 strain, were added, and the distribution time of each strain was as follows: all the four strains in 2008, but mainly concentrated in C4a1; the epidemic strains in 2009 were C4a1 and C4a2; in 2010, except one strain in Zhanjiang, which belonged to C4a4, the others were C4a1. From the regional distribution point of view: most of the virus strains are C4a1 and C4a2; only in 2008 Dongguan ramet 009-08-M constituted C4a3 alone; C4a4 only appeared in Foshan and Zhanjiang. In a comprehensive view, the epidemic of each virus strain has no regional and temporal concentration trend. With age increasing, the incidence of neurological infection decreased significantly (P 0.05). Logistic regression was used to analyze the influence of gender, age, viral type and VP1 mutation on the severity of clinical symptoms of patients with neurological symptoms. There was no statistically significant correlation between age and viral A289T variation. Viral 289A (289 alanine) was associated with EV71 nervous system infection (P 0.05, OR = 2.360, 95% CI was 1.163-4.659). 4. The successful establishment of VIM knockout cell lines in human brain microvascular endothelial cells using CRISPR-Cas9 technology and lentiviral vector packaging. After 48 hours of infection with HBMEC, the expression of GFP was nearly 70%-80%. After screening stable HBMEC VIM-KO and control cell lines with purinomycin, the expression of VIM in HBMEC control and VIM-KO was detected with specific antibody of VIM. The results showed that the expression of VIM in VIM-KO cells decreased. More than 90% of the cells were knocked out by VIM. 5. Analysis of the role of VIM in EV71 infection of HBMEC. When EV71 enters the cell, the cell morphology will change due to its damage to the cell. By contrast, the morphology of the cells infected with VIM-KO by the same MOI of EV71 remained almost unchanged 24 hours after infection. Even at 48 hours, the morphological changes of the cells were very small, and only a small number of cells began to become round. The first step of EV71 invasion was to adsorb on the cell surface. The difference in the amount of viral nucleic acid between HBMEC control and VIM-KO surface was detected by fluorescence quantitative PCR. The results showed that the adsorption of EV71 on the cell surface decreased by 40% after VIM knockout. After 24 hours and 48 hours of infection, the viral quantity in normal HBMEC increased to 3 times and 8 times respectively, while the viral quantity in VIM-KO cells was only 1.3 times of that in 0 hours after 24 hours. After 48 hours of infection with HBMEC, the nucleic acid content of EV71 virus in VIM knockout cells was 1/12 of that in control cells. The results of acid assay showed that the number of cells knocked out by VIM was 1.4 times less than that of the control cells. The replication of nucleic acid and the synthesis of protein of EV71 virus in the cells were basically synchronous. During 2008-2010, the EV71 virus strain in Guangdong Province was C4a, which was also the main epidemic strain in China. It was found that the EV71 virus strain had evolved during the epidemic process in Guangdong Province, and three families, C4a2-C4a4, were added. The EV71 virus subtype had no obvious trend in time and region. 2. The A289T variation and distribution of the virus were not significant. Virus 289A (289 alanine) is easy to cause the infection of EV71 nervous system. The A289T mutation locus is the result of molecular epidemiology of 194 EV71 infected people in Guangdong Province. Further study on this locus is of practical significance for the prevention and treatment of EV71 infection in Guangdong Province and even in the whole country. 3. VIM is the receptor of EV71 on the surface of HBMEC. EV71 invades HBMEC by binding to the receptor VIM, and further affects the replication and even release of EV71 in cells. The hypothesis that EV71 infects the nervous system is put forward: EV71 enters HBMEC cells through the release of RNA mediated by VIM receptors, crosses the blood-brain barrier, and eventually infects the nervous system. The study will be helpful to reveal the mechanism of EV71 infection in the nervous system. 4. In this paper, we combine the study of virus mutation with the study of receptors, and conclude that the virus mutation and its receptors affect both the nervous system infection caused by EV71.
【学位授予单位】:南方医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R512.5;R742.9
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 Tzou-Yien Lin ,何爱华;台湾肠道病毒71型暴发流行:发生与确认[J];中国人兽共患病杂志;2003年06期
2 刘铭,任刚,张大勇,朱青,苏飞,杜雯,喻浩,于传宁;2003年贵州省急性弛缓性麻痹病例肠道病毒监测分析[J];贵州医药;2004年08期
3 ;“肠道病毒71型感染的诊断与治疗”试题[J];上海预防医学杂志;2008年09期
4 蒋建国;水中的病毒[J];国外医学参考资料(卫生学分册);1979年02期
5 何家鑫;王碧锦;苏用年;林桂华;田文琪;;肠道病毒传播动态观察[J];福建医药杂志;1981年02期
6 赵锦铭;肠道病毒[J];北京医学;1985年06期
7 新宫正久,刘瑞璋;偶蹄类动物肠道病毒抗癌作用的研究——由鹿分离的肠道病毒性状[J];哈尔滨医科大学学报;1985年01期
8 杨苏河;杨林;张楚瑜;王祖卿;;医院污水中肠道病毒的分离与鉴定(摘要)[J];铁道劳动安全卫生与环保;1987年03期
9 吴家驹;肠道病毒引起的急性出血性结膜炎[J];中国公共卫生;1991年01期
10 雅德;;抗肠道病毒的新药[J];国外医学情报;2001年03期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 徐勇胜;;肠道病毒71型感染所致肺水肿的预测及干预的研究[A];中华医学会第十七次全国儿科学术大会论文汇编(下册)[C];2012年
2 徐勇胜;;肠道病毒71型感染所致肺水肿的预测及干预的研究[A];中华医学会第十三届全国儿科呼吸学术会议论文汇编[C];2012年
3 陈友鹏;梁旭竞;;肠道病毒71型感染所致中枢神经系统损害及其免疫发病机制[A];第四届中国医师协会感染科医师大会暨传染病诊治高峰论坛、浙江省医学会肝病、感染病学学术年会论文汇编[C];2011年
4 崔大伟;谢国良;葛霞琴;秦志梅;郑书发;余斐;范剑;楼滨;陈瑜;;双重荧光定量RT-PCR检测肠道病毒方法的建立及应用[A];2012年浙江省检验医学学术年会论文集[C];2012年
5 张欣;邓小玲;管大伟;郑焕英;郭雪;杨杏芬;柯昌文;;2008年广东省肠道病毒71型分离株全基因组核苷酸序列分析[A];新发和再发传染病防治热点研讨会论文集[C];2009年
6 罗文英;赵卫;曹虹;刘建军;张仁利;;肠道病毒71型感染人脑微血管内皮细胞的比较蛋白质组学研究[A];新发传染病研究热点研讨会论文集[C];2012年
7 袁艺;宋国维;曹玲;崔小岱;钱渊;朱春梅;伏谨;马连华;许峥;朱汝南;邓洁;王芳;赵林清;;肠道病毒相关的小儿急性呼吸道感染的研究[A];中华医学会第十四次全国儿科学术会议论文汇编[C];2006年
8 王彦霞;康锴;黄学勇;陈豪敏;许汴利;;河南省2011年健康人群肠道病毒带毒率监测[A];中华医学会全国新发和再发传染病2012年学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2012年
9 钱澄怀;熊华;;婴幼儿粪便标本中晶格样结构物与肠道病毒的关系[A];第五次全国电子显微学会议论文摘要集[C];1988年
10 侯俊;马洪滨;李鲁平;杨静;郭静霞;刘爱霞;徐军;聂为民;李伯安;毛远丽;;肠道病毒71型血清学检测方法的建立及初步应用[A];中华医学会第八次全国检验医学学术会议暨中华医学会检验分会成立30周年庆典大会资料汇编[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 省卫生厅;肠道病毒及其引发的疾病[N];福建日报;2008年
2 许俊芳 赵秋英(辽宁中医学院);夏季,谨防肠道病毒侵袭宝宝健康[N];上海中医药报;2005年
3 孙晨;阜阳病毒60天[N];中国经营报;2008年
4 健康时报记者 李桂兰;夏季肠道病会耍新花样[N];健康时报;2012年
5 周立民;阜阳789名儿童感染肠道病毒,死亡19人[N];新华每日电讯;2008年
6 本报记者 王均珠;我市未见肠道EV71感染病例[N];贵阳日报;2008年
7 复旦大学儿科医院教授 时毓民;哪些肠道病毒容易侵袭婴幼儿[N];上海中医药报;2008年
8 特约记者 曾航邋本报记者 周扬;阜阳致命EV71病毒调查[N];21世纪经济报道;2008年
9 记者 袁立新 通讯员 段立华;肠道病毒71型研究步步深入[N];健康报;2000年
10 本版编辑邋代群 崔静 周立民 熊润频;阜阳EV71感染事件:已有585例患儿痊愈[N];新华每日电讯;2008年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 刘为勇;南昌与武汉地区手足口病分子流行病学调查研究[D];武汉大学;2012年
2 王春阳;肠道病毒71型与宿主干扰素系统相互作用的机制研究[D];南京大学;2016年
3 檀晓娟;1998-2011年中国肠道病毒71型的分子流行病学研究[D];中国疾病预防控制中心;2012年
4 刘培培;CPTⅡF352C突变对于重症EV71感染的临床和机制研究[D];青岛大学;2016年
5 常军亮;长春地区肠道病毒71型小鼠模型的致病性及对候选疫苗的保护性评价[D];吉林大学;2015年
6 罗文英;肠道病毒71型感染人脑微血管内皮细胞的机制研究[D];南方医科大学;2012年
7 侯俊;肠道病毒71型基因分析、病毒拯救、毒力及免疫原性的比较研究[D];中国人民解放军医学院;2014年
8 茅凌翔;肠道病毒71型分子流行病学调查及miRNA抑制肠道病毒71型体外复制的研究[D];江苏大学;2011年
9 张文清;RT-PCR对水中肠道病毒灭活效果及机制的评价研究[D];第四军医大学;1996年
10 杜海威;肠道病毒71型2C蛋白调节NF-κB活化的机制研究[D];北京协和医学院;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 李博;人神经细胞粘附分子及其配体1在肠道病毒71型感染所致手足口病中的表达[D];河北医科大学;2015年
2 赵芳芳;河北省手足口病伴脱甲症病例的流行病学特征分析[D];河北医科大学;2015年
3 朱艳菊;2009-2010年云南省肠道病毒相关无菌性脑炎的分子流行学研究[D];北京协和医学院;2015年
4 孙丹;331例危重症手足口病死亡病例临床特点及相关因素分析[D];广西医科大学;2015年
5 张盛;2007~2012年山东省临沂市手足口病流行病学和肠道病毒71型基因特征分析[D];中国疾病预防控制中心;2014年
6 王帅;脂滴和脂代谢在肠道病毒71型增殖过程中的作用研究[D];南京大学;2014年
7 李旺;鼠肠道病毒宏基因组学研究[D];江苏大学;2016年
8 盖小春;E种肠道病毒HY12小鼠感染模型及感染小鼠抗体消长规律[D];吉林大学;2016年
9 邢泽黎;E种肠道病毒HY12的分离鉴定与双抗体夹心ELISA检测病毒抗原方法的建立及其应用[D];吉林大学;2016年
10 李园园;JAK/STAT信号通路在肠道病毒71型感染THP-1细胞中的作用机制[D];苏州大学;2016年
,本文编号:2243348
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/chuanranbingxuelunwen/2243348.html