验证反刍动物常用饲料小肠可吸收氨基酸流量简化模型
本文选题:CNCPS + 氨基酸流量 ; 参考:《山东农业大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:本研究通过采集18种反刍动物常用饲料原料,根据CNCPS对RUP小肠可吸收氨基酸流量的预测方程,测定预测RUP小肠可吸收氨基酸流量及各时间点降解残渣的小肠消化率,结合CP降解率和小肠消化率,验证CNCPS简化模型:粗料方程Y=0.00197+2.11988X,r=0.99946,P0.0001;精料方程Y=-0.05564+1.40925X,r=0.99955,P0.0001。通过瘤胃尼龙袋法测定饲料不同成分的降解率,分析饲料不同成分的实时降解率和有效降解率的相关性,用单一时间点的降解率来估算有效降解率,简化饲料降解率的测定。结果显示:(1)8种粗饲料各时间点CP瘤胃降解率和有效降解率的线性回归分析分析得出,8h的CP瘤胃降解率与有效降解率的相关性最高,线性回归方程为Y=0.90902X+9.91209,r=0.98702,P0.0001;10种精饲料各时间点CP瘤胃降解率和有效降解率的线性回归分析得出,8h的CP瘤胃降解率与有效降解率的相关性最高,线性回归方程为Y=1.00951X+1.61992,r=0.9654,P0.0001。(2)18种饲料的各时间点瘤胃降解残渣的小肠消化率与RUP有效小肠消化率线性回归分析得出,8种粗饲料的8h小肠消化率与有效消化率的相关性最高,线性回归方程为Y=0.53854+0.97088X,r=0.99579,P00001;10种精饲料8h小肠消化率与有效消化率的相关性最高,线性回归方程为Y=3.23556+0.95384X,r=0.9904,P0.0001。(3)验证3种简化的方案,结果显示,简化模型三的可靠性最高,即粗料和精料均以8h降解率和8h小肠消化率对RUP小肠可吸收氨基酸流量的预测结果与CNCPS的评定结果相关性最高,粗料方程Y=0.00197+2.11988X,r=0.99869,差异性分析P值为0.3467,平均相对偏差为6.8361;精料方程Y=-0.05564+1.40925X,r=0.99541,差异性分析P值为0.065,平均相对偏差为22.788。验证得出该简化模型可行。(4)对饲料CP、DM、OM、ADF和NDF的实时降解率与瘤胃有效降解率的相关性分析,简化得出,粗料和精料均以16h降解率与有效降解率相关性最高,粗料方程为Y=0.68368+0.9843X,r=0.98757,P0.0001;精料方程为Y=-0.86237+0.85602X,r=0.96078,P0.0001。
[Abstract]:In this study, 18 common feed materials of ruminants were collected. According to the prediction equation of RUP small intestinal absorbable amino acid flow rate by CNCPS, the small intestine digestibility of RUP small intestine absorbable amino acid flow and degradation residue at different time points were determined.Combined with CP degradation rate and digestibility of small intestine, the simplified CNCPS model was verified as follows: crude feed equation: YP0. 00197 2.11988Xrnrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrt 0.99955X, and concentrate equation YP0. 0001.The degradation rate of different components of feed was determined by rumen nylon bag method, and the correlation between the real time degradation rate and effective degradation rate of different components of feed was analyzed. The effective degradation rate was estimated by single time point degradation rate, and the determination of feed degradation rate was simplified.The results showed that the rumen degradation rate and the effective degradation rate of CP were the highest at 8h after the linear regression analysis of CP degradation rate and effective degradation rate of 8 kinds of forage forage.The linear regression analysis of 10 kinds of concentrate feed CP degradation rate and effective degradation rate at different time points showed that there was the highest correlation between CP rumen degradation rate and effective degradation rate at 8 h. The linear regression equation was YP0.902X 9.912090.98702P0.00010.The linear regression analysis showed that the rumen degradation rate of CP and the effective degradation rate were the highest at 8 h.The linear regression equation was that the small intestine digestibility of rumen degradation residue and the RUP effective intestinal digestibility were the highest in 8 hours of eight kinds of crude feed at each time point of 18 kinds of feedstuffs, the linear regression equation was YT 1.00951X 1.61992rn 0.9654g P0.0001.20.The linear regression analysis showed that there was the highest correlation between the intestinal digestibility and the effective digestibility of 8 kinds of crude feed.The linear regression equation was: YC0.53854 0.97088Xrttrium 0.99579KP001C 10 kinds of concentrate feed had the highest correlation with the effective digestibility for 8h, and the linear regression equation was YC3.23556 0.95384XRO 0.9904 P0.0001.3to verify the three simplified schemes. The results showed that the three simplified models had the highest reliability.The results of 8h degradation rate and 8h intestinal digestibility for RUP intestinal absorbable amino acid flow were the most correlated with CNCPS evaluation.The difference analysis P value is 0.3467, the average relative deviation is 6.8361, and the concentrate equation Y _ (0.05564) 1.40925X ru _ (0.99541), the difference analysis P value is 0.065, the average relative deviation is 22.7888.The crude material equation is 0.99869, the difference analysis is 0.99869, the average relative deviation is 22.788, the difference analysis is 0.065, the average relative deviation is 22.788, the difference is 0.065, and the average relative deviation is 22.788.The results showed that the simplified model was feasible. The correlation analysis between the real-time degradation rate and the rumen effective degradation rate of NDF and ADF was obtained. The results showed that 16 h degradation rate and effective degradation rate of crude and concentrate were the highest.The crude material equation is YT 0.68368 0.9843XL 0.98757N P0.0001, and the concentrate equation is YP0.86237 0.85602Xrc0.96078KP0.0001.
【学位授予单位】:山东农业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:S816
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 宋伟红;韩欢胜;刘立成;陶志云;夏炎;王庆慧;;北方肉牛常用粗饲料主要营养成分瘤胃有效降解率[J];中国牛业科学;2012年06期
2 王建兵,韩继福,高宏伟,许进香,陈维岩,王景林;微生物接种剂和酶制剂对玉米秸组成成分和瘤胃有效降解率的影响[J];中国兽医学报;2002年03期
3 刘强;黄应祥;王聪;王浩;郭刚;;异戊酸对西门塔尔牛瘤胃营养物质有效降解率的影响[J];中国草食动物;2006年05期
4 乔良;郝俊玺;闫素梅;赵天章;高义彪;;奶牛主要饲料原料蛋白质瘤胃降解率的研究[J];中国奶牛;2008年06期
5 蒋微;曲永利;刘立成;;拉巴豆与玉米混播青贮对奶牛瘤胃发酵和有效降解率的影响[J];中国畜牧杂志;2013年19期
6 张文举,晏向华,龚月生,王加启;亚硫酸铵对稻草瘤胃有效降解率的影响[J];四川畜牧兽医;2003年01期
7 黄秀声;杨信;黄勤楼;陈钟佃;冯德庆;钟珍梅;;2种决明属牧草不同生育期营养成分在肉牛瘤胃降解动态研究[J];草地学报;2011年04期
8 郜玉钢,高秀华,杨福合,王晓伟,李光玉;鱼粉在梅花鹿瘤胃内有效降解率的测定[J];特产研究;1998年02期
9 高巍;何佳文;刘晨黎;孔平;陈傲东;刘保仓;赵伟利;;苜蓿草粉干物质、有机物及粗蛋白质在农户育肥模式下哈萨克羊瘤胃有效降解率评定[J];黑龙江畜牧兽医;2014年05期
10 宋伟红;苗树君;曲永利;马慧;刘立成;;不同方法调制的苜蓿主要营养成分奶牛瘤胃有效降解率[J];中国牛业科学;2008年04期
相关会议论文 前5条
1 田雨佳;曹志军;黄文明;李胜利;;苜蓿中不同营养成分有效降解率与48小时降解率之间的相关关系[A];中国畜牧兽医学会养牛学分会2011年学术研讨会论文集[C];2011年
2 田雨佳;李胜利;周鑫宇;黄文明;;不同地区不同茬次不同生长期苜蓿在奶牛瘤胃降解率的研究[A];第四届(2011)中国苜蓿发展大会论文集[C];2011年
3 苏衍菁;赵国琦;严长杰;吕宗友;;全株脆性突变水稻在奶牛瘤胃内降解特性的研究[A];中国奶业协会年会论文集2009(上册)[C];2009年
4 马丽娟;杨沛霖;宋百军;;几种常用饲料在长白山狍瘤胃中降解率的测定[A];中国畜牧兽医学会2006学术年会论文集(上册)[C];2006年
5 马丽娟;杨沛霖;宋百军;;几种常用饲料在长白山狍瘤胃中降解率的测定[A];增强自主创新能力 促进吉林经济发展——启明杯·吉林省第四届科学技术学术年会论文集(下册)[C];2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 姬奇武;山西不同居群白羊草的营养价值评定[D];山西农业大学;2015年
2 曹善勇;肉牛常用饲料瘤胃降解特性及日粮类型对瘤胃发酵影响的研究[D];山东农业大学;2015年
3 李振;秦川肉牛常用饲料瘤胃降解特性研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2016年
4 萨其仍贵;奶牛主要饲料原料纤维物质和蛋白质瘤胃降解特性的研究[D];内蒙古农业大学;2009年
5 李小娜;不同品种玉米作为奶牛饲料的营养价值评定[D];河北农业大学;2012年
6 王立明;奶牛常用饲料瘤胃降解规律和小肠消化率的研究[D];内蒙古农业大学;2012年
7 李春雷;奶牛常用粗饲料营养价值评定[D];东北农业大学;2014年
8 赵天章;奶牛主要饲料原料蛋白质和纤维物质瘤胃降解规律的研究[D];内蒙古农业大学;2007年
9 杨信;南方牧草营养品质及瘤胃降解特性研究[D];福建农林大学;2010年
10 刘华;新疆地区23种饲料营养成分及其瘤胃降解特性比较研究[D];新疆农业大学;2012年
,本文编号:1746863
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/dongwuyixue/1746863.html