苎麻的饲用价值评定及其在山羊生产中的利用方法和效果研究
[Abstract]:This subject mainly studies the utilization effect and utilization method of ramie in the production of mutton sheep. It provides reference for the rational utilization of ramie in the production of meat and sheep. It is divided into the following three parts: Test 1: the test of this experiment is to evaluate the feeding value of ramie leaf, ramie whole plant and Ramie by nylon bag method, respectively. In vitro gas production method was used to determine the dynamic gas production of ramie leaves, ramie whole plants and ramie 72 h, and to obtain gas production parameters, and the nylon bag test was carried out with the three kinds of raw materials mentioned above. The degradation rate of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid washing fiber (ADF) were measured, and the degradation parameters were obtained. The results showed that during the gas production test, the cumulative fermentation gas production and the maximum theoretical gas production were the highest at 72 h, significantly higher than that of Ramie (P0.05), ramie leaves, ramie leaves and ramie fiber ramie were not significant (P0.05), and the ramie fiber was the lowest. The degradation rate of DM, CP, NDF and ADF of ramie at 72 h was in turn from ramie to ramie, ramie, DM, NDF, NDF, ADF, and ramie, and ramie, and ramie, and ramie were the lowest. However, the effective degradation rate of CP showed the largest ramie plant, the middle ramie leaves, and the hemp fiber. According to the overall effective degradation rate, the utilization effect of ramie leaf and ramie whole plant is better than that of hemp fiber ramie. Test two: this experiment was added to the goat diet with different proportion of ramie hay as material, in order to explore the feeding effect and suitable amount of the goat in different proportion of ramie. 20 Liuyang black goats with good body weight and close weight were randomly divided into 4 groups, with 5 replicates in each group and 1 sheep for each. The control group did not add ramie T0 (24% rice straw +36% alfalfa) in basal diet, treated a group of T30 (24% rice straw +25.2% alfalfa +10.8% ramie), and treated two groups of T60 (24% rice straw +14.4% alfalfa +21.6% ramie) and treatment. Three groups of T100 (24% rice straw, alfalfa +36% ramie), 54 days in the test period, 14 days in the pre feeding period and 40 days in the positive feeding period, determine the growth performance of the goat, the index of gastric juice, the biochemical index of blood, the slaughter performance, the apparent digestibility of nutrient and the meat quality index. The results show that the average daily gain and average daily intake are T100T0T60T30, but the difference is no more than that of 1). Significantly (P0.05), the material weight ratio was T100TOT60T30, the difference was not significant (P0.05), the effect of feeding ramie alone was superior to the control group and alfalfa group.2 alone. Compared with the control group, the rumen nitrogen content, total VFA content, acetic acid, propionic acid and ethylene propylene ratio in group T30, T60 and T100 groups were not significantly different (P0.05), and the results were fed with cannabis and alfalfa rumen fermentation results. The effects of ramie hay on the content of urea and triglyceride in the blood were significantly different (P0.05), and the urea content in group T100 was significantly lower than that of the control group (P0.05), and the content of triglyceride in T60 and T100 groups was significantly higher than that of the control group (P0.05).4), and the addition of ramie hay to the CP apparent digestibility, Ash apparent digestibility, NDF apparent digestibility and ADF were added to the diet of T60 and T100 groups. The apparent digestibility had a significant difference (P0.05). The apparent digestibility of the above indexes was T0T30T60T100.5). The effects of ramie hay on the slaughter rate, the visceral weight and the area of eye muscle were not significant (P0.05), and the effect of ramie hay on the meat quality indexes was not significant (P0.05). The difference was not significant (P0.05). The effect of ramie feeding goats and alfalfa fed goats was similar, although the apparent digestibility of nutrients was less than alfalfa, but it did not affect the growth performance of goats. Therefore, the effect of Ramie on goats was better. Experiment three: the effect of ramie feeding on different processing methods of ramie was discussed, and the ramie in the production of goats was studied. The experiment adopted 2 x 2 factor test design, factor 1 for ramie processing, divided into ramie silage and ramie hay, factor 2 for ramie fiber treatment, divided into hemp fiber and non hemp fiber. The experiment selected 32 Liuyang black goats with good body weight and similar weight, which were randomly divided into 4 groups, 8 replicates each group, and repeat 1 sheep in each group. Treatment 1 to remove ramie silage group SD after hemp fiber removal, treatment 2 is not to remove hemp fiber ramie silage group SF, treatment 3 to remove ramie hay group HD after hemp fiber treatment, treatment 4 is not to go to ramie hay group HF, test period 54 days, 14 days of pre feeding, 40 days in positive feeding period, determine the growth performance of goats, tumor gastric juice indexes, blood biochemical indexes, slaughter sex Ability, nutrient apparent digestibility and meat quality index. The results showed that 1) the net weight gain, average daily intake and weight ratio of ramie were not significant (P0.05), and the average daily gain of goats had significant interaction effect (P0.05).2) the content of ammonia nitrogen, total VFA content and acetic acid content in different processing treatment of ramie. There was no significant difference in the content of propionic acid, butyric acid and EPR (P0.05).3) the different processing treatments of ramie had significant interaction effect on the content of glutamic aminotransferase, urea, triglyceride and phosphorus in the blood (P0.05). The difference of the effects of Ramie processing on globulin and low density lipoprotein was significant (P0.05), all of which were ramie dry The grass treatment group was significantly higher than the ramie silage treatment group (P0.05). The effect of ramie fiber treatment on low density lipoprotein content was significantly different (P0.05), and the fiber treatment group was significantly greater than non fiber treatment group (P0.05).4) ramie processing and ramie fiber treatment to DM apparent digestibility, CP apparent digestibility, NDF apparent digestibility, ADF table. There was significant difference in the influence of the apparent digestibility (P0.05), the ramie hay was significantly greater than the ramie silage group (P0.05), and the ramie fiber treatment was significantly greater than the fiber group (P0.05). In addition, the ramie processing treatment had a significant influence on the apparent digestibility of Ash (P0.05), and the ramie hay treatment group was larger than the ramie green. The effect of different treatment methods on the slaughter performance of Ramie (P0.05.5) was not significant (P0.05).6). In the meat quality index, the effect of ramie fiber treatment on meat quality was greater, in which the PH for the muscle 45min was significantly greater than the ramie non fiber group (P0.05), and the 24h muscle PH was the opposite to the 45min, and the ramie did not go to the fiber. The group of the group was significantly greater than the ramie fiber group (P0.05). The muscle red degree a* and the Yellow degree b* in the two time point were significantly greater than the ramie non fiber group (P0.05), the brightness L* was opposite to the red a* and the Yellow degree b*, and the ramie non fiber group was significantly larger than the ramie fiber group (P0.05). The crude protein content and the partial amino acid content in the muscle were more than that of the ramie fiber group (P0.05). There was a significant difference in the content of some fatty acids (P0.05), and the fiber removal in Ramie was significantly higher than that in Ramie Fiber Group (P0.05).
【学位授予单位】:扬州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:S827.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周带娣;苎麻生物脱胶研究进展[J];作物研究;2003年01期
2 李亚玲;任小松;杨燕;李蓉;;苎麻生物脱胶技术的应用优势[J];四川农业科技;2009年08期
3 李蓉;梁月;;四川达州市苎麻种植开发典型调研[J];国际沙棘研究与开发;2011年02期
4 ;世界性苎麻热方兴未艾[J];中国水土保持;1986年09期
5 严文淦;;近年苎麻品质下降原因[J];农业科技通讯;1988年03期
6 唐守伟;苎麻产销形势分析及发展策略[J];作物研究;1992年S2期
7 王春桃,黎觐臣,,李宗道;我国苎麻品种合理布局的研究[J];湖南农业大学学报;1996年02期
8 方至;湖南山区发展苎麻的气候生态环境优势[J];山地研究;1997年03期
9 ;种苎麻价高莫猛赶 价低莫急砍[J];农村发展论丛;1999年05期
10 袁晋煈,黄建英;分宜苎麻品质较高的气候优势分析[J];江西气象科技;2004年03期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 简海燕;杨秋莲;黄建英;;“赣苎三号”苎麻种植的气候条件分析[A];第27届中国气象学会年会气候资源应用研究分会场论文集[C];2010年
2 王亮;周精华;蒋杰;邢虎成;白莎莎;李杰;;赤霉素和乙烯利对雌性苎麻和雌雄同株异花苎麻的影响[A];中国作物学会50周年庆祝会暨2011年学术年会论文集[C];2011年
3 喻春明;张彦红;朱爱国;王延周;朱四元;唐守伟;熊和平;;苎麻种质资源纤维结晶度变异及其主要品质性状的关联性研究[A];中国作物学会50周年庆祝会暨2011年学术年会论文集[C];2011年
4 佘玮;c灿瓿
本文编号:2128713
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/dongwuyixue/2128713.html