笋壳与麦麸、稻壳、稻草混合青贮过程营养成分及有机酸变化的研究
[Abstract]:In this experiment, bamboo shoot husk was used as silage material, and wheat bran, rice husk and straw were used as silage products to study the Mixed Silage of bamboo shoot husk. Five treatments were designed in part: the ratio of fresh weight of bamboo shoot shell to straw was 60:40, 70:30, 80:20, 85:15, 97% (80 bamboo shoot shell + 20 straw) + 3% corn flour, and four replicates were carried out for each treatment. The results were as follows: The results of nutrient analysis showed that there was no water content in the Mixed Silage of bamboo shoot shell and wheat bran, rice husk and rice straw within 1 to 45 days. The dry matter content of 70% bamboo shoot husk + 30% rice husk and 80% bamboo shoot husk + 20% rice husk decreased significantly on the 7th day (P? 0.05), but did not change significantly on the 14th to 45th days. The crude protein content decreased significantly on the 7th day of silage (P?0.05). The NDF content changed most prominently from 7 days to 14 days, and decreased significantly on the 14th day (P?0.05). The ADF content of 80% bamboo shoot hull + 20% rice hull and 85% bamboo shoot hull + 15% rice hull decreased significantly on the 7th day, 14 and 30 days (P?0.05). The crude ash content of the Mixed Silage treatment group increased gradually in the first 30 days and decreased again in the 45th day with the increase of silage days. Ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen value increased fastest in the 7 days before silage (P?0.05). At the end of silage, the sensory evaluation results of 60% bamboo shoot shell + 40% wheat bran treatment group were good, and NDF and ADF content were low.70% bamboo shoot shell + 30% rice husk. The sensory evaluation results of 80% bamboo shoot shell + 20% rice husk treatment group were good, the reduction of soluble reducing sugar and the ratio of ammonia nitrogen to total nitrogen were low. 70% bamboo shoot shell + 30% rice straw treatment group had good sensory evaluation results, and the contents of NDF and ADF were low. The sensory evaluation results of bamboo shoot shell silage alone were inferior. 97% (80% bamboo shoot shell + 20% rice straw) + 3% corn flour treatment group had better sensory evaluation, and crude protein was better. The results of pH value and organic acid determination showed that the pH value of the Mixed Silage samples decreased significantly (P?0.05) on the 7th day of silage, decreased continuously on the 14th and 30th days of silage, and increased slightly on the 45th day of silage. The content of lactic acid and acetic acid increased gradually with the increase of silage fermentation time. The content of lactic acid and acetic acid increased significantly in the first 7 days (P?0.05), 14 days, 30 days and 45 days. In the early stage, there was no butyric acid in the Mixed Silage samples of each treatment group. At 14 days of silage, 80% bamboo shell + 20% wheat bran, 85% bamboo shell + 15% wheat bran appeared a small amount of butyric acid. The content of lactic acid in rice husk treatment group increased obviously in the later stage of silage, the pH value was lower, butyric acid was not produced in the silage process, and the quality of silage was excellent. 70% bamboo husk + 30% straw treatment group. The content of lactic acid in the silage process was higher and pH value was lower, butyric acid did not appear in the later stage of silage, so it was suitable for silage. The results of sensory evaluation, determination of nutrient composition, pH value and organic acid showed that the shells of bamboo shoots were silage alone, and the quality of silage was poor. The Mixed Silage of rice husk and bamboo husk was better than wheat bran, and the Mixed Silage of rice straw and bamboo husk was better. Mixed silage with bamboo shoot shell was feasible, and the silage quality was normal. The suitable combination was 60% bamboo shoot shell + 40% wheat bran. Mixed silage with wheat bran and rice straw was feasible, but the silage quality was poor. The feasible combination was 70% bamboo shoot shell + 30% rice straw.
【学位授予单位】:安徽农业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:S816.53
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 曹克雄;;笋壳的加工利用[J];农村实用工程技术(农业工程);1987年04期
2 ;鲜笋壳综合开发用利[J];广西林业科技;1992年02期
3 周兆祥,蔡卫民,林瑞文;竹笋壳工艺板研制初报[J];林业科技开发;1995年01期
4 连饶璐;笋壳的加工利用[J];农村实用技术与信息;1995年10期
5 ;鲜笋壳有待开发[J];中国农垦;1995年12期
6 方言;笋壳叶:造纸新原料[J];农村新技术;1996年03期
7 许丽旋;蔡建秀;;竹笋壳黄酮提取液抑菌效果初步研究[J];农产品加工(学刊);2006年07期
8 廖益强;黄彪;董健;陆则坚;;流化床快速热解笋壳的研究[J];福建农业学报;2010年03期
9 贾燕芳;石伟勇;;几种笋壳的化学成分及其纤维素特征[J];浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版);2011年03期
10 唐晓明,欧阳军,龙灵渊;产品加工与贮藏[J];江西农业科技;1987年11期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 王小芹;刘建新;;笋壳饲料营养价值的评定[A];第三届全国饲料营养学术研讨会论文集[C];1998年
2 王小芹;刘建新;;笋壳作为反刍动物氨化稻草日粮补充料的效果研究[A];第三届全国饲料营养学术研讨会论文集[C];1998年
相关重要报纸文章 前5条
1 吕义德;笋壳回山 建瓯农民的“免费绿肥”[N];福建日报;2009年
2 管光前 郑芳;临安羊成为笋壳污染克星[N];中国畜牧兽医报;2011年
3 林秀英 李宝成;笋壳回山 肥了青山[N];中国绿色时报;2009年
4 叶晔 朱立毅;新型笋壳拖鞋[N];经济参考报;2003年
5 通讯员 孙建军 励明登 记者 陈醉; 笋壳变身竹山“营养餐”[N];浙江日报;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 吴淑茗;毛竹笋壳制备高取代度羧甲基纤维素钠的研究[D];福州大学;2014年
2 张友为;超级电容器用竹笋壳基活性炭材料的制备及其性能研究[D];湘潭大学;2016年
3 柳俊超;笋壳与麦麸、稻壳、稻草混合青贮过程营养成分及有机酸变化的研究[D];安徽农业大学;2015年
4 赵杰;笋壳炭的制备和表征及其在土壤改良中的应用研究[D];厦门大学;2014年
5 陈延兴;竹笋壳纤维的研发及应用[D];武汉纺织大学;2010年
6 高雪娟;竹笋壳提取物的成分和生物活性研究[D];北京林业大学;2011年
7 曾俊棋;笋壳饲料的资源化利用及其氰甙脱毒方法的研究[D];浙江农林大学;2015年
8 苏雅静;竹笋壳黄酮的高效提取及其对酪氨酸酶活性影响的动力学研究[D];北京林业大学;2010年
9 褚红亮;笋壳/高密度聚乙烯复合材料制备及性能研究[D];合肥工业大学;2012年
10 王音;竹笋加工下脚料发酵菌筛选和发酵优化研究[D];宁波大学;2014年
,本文编号:2200439
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/dongwuyixue/2200439.html