天山北坡草甸草原碳过程及其对围栏封育的响应
[Abstract]:Grassland ecosystem is an important part of terrestrial ecosystem. It is of great significance to understand the material cycle of the whole terrestrial ecosystem by studying its carbon cycle. Grassland ecosystem carbon cycle has become a hot research topic. At present, the study of carbon process mainly focuses on desert steppe, alpine steppe, subalpine steppe, alpine steppe, and alpine steppe. In this study, Li-8100 open-circuit soil carbon flux measurement system and static box method (Li-840 CO2/H2O infrared analyzer) were used in Gangou Township, 50 km southwest of Urumqi. The soil respiration and ecosystem respiration inside and outside the enclosure of mountain meadow grassland were observed in situ. At the same time, the soil, root system and vegetation inside and outside the fence were investigated, and the environmental factors such as temperature, ground temperature, water content and other environmental factors were observed. The conclusions are as follows: 1. The soil carbon density, aboveground vegetation carbon density and root carbon density of enclosed and grazing mountain meadow steppe were compared. The results showed that the soil carbon density and root carbon density of mountain meadow steppe after 9 years of enclosure were higher than those of herding area in different soil layers. Especially at 10 cm, the soil layer difference reached a very significant level (P0.01). The carbon density of aboveground plants in enclosed area was significantly higher than that in herding area (P0.01). Therefore, fencing promoted the carbon sequestration capacity of mountain meadow steppe, and significantly increased the soil and plant carbon accumulation of mountain meadow grassland. 2. In mountain meadow grassland, both inside and outside the fence, soil respiration showed obvious diurnal variation and seasonal variation, and all of them showed a single peak curve. Grazing did not change the variation of soil respiration rate. The peak form of May to August was obvious. There was no obvious peak in October, and the carbon emission in summer was obviously higher than that in other months, especially in June and July, soil respiration contributed the most to the total carbon emissions. Overall, carbon emissions after containment were significantly higher than those outside the fence. Temperature and humidity are two important factors affecting soil respiration, but temperature plays a leading role. There was no significant correlation between soil respiration and soil moisture content in mountain meadow grassland, and there was a significant positive correlation between soil respiration and soil temperature, and temperature was the leading factor to determine soil respiration in mountain meadow grassland. The correlation between soil respiration and temperature inside and outside the enclosure is higher than that outside the fence, and the correlation of soil 0~5cm is higher than that of other depth soil, and the correlation between soil respiration and temperature in each layer of soil is higher than that outside the fence. The soil temperature of 5 cm can better reflect the change of soil respiration. 4. In mountain meadow grassland, both inside and outside the enclosure, the carbon exchange of ecosystem showed obvious diurnal variation and seasonal variation, all of them showed a single peak curve, grazing did not change the change rule of carbon flux, and from May to August, carbon sink was obvious. However, the carbon uptake in the enclosure was significantly higher than that outside the fence, and the other months were carbon source. The enclosed mountain meadow steppe was a carbon sink in the annual season because it contributed a lot to the carbon sequestration of the ecosystem in May and August. But outside the fence because of the summer carbon absorption contribution is small, so the performance of carbon source. 5. 5. Temperature and humidity are two important factors affecting carbon exchange in ecosystem, but temperature plays a leading role. In mountain meadow steppe, the correlation between ecosystem carbon exchange and soil water content is not significant, but there is a significant linear correlation between ecosystem carbon exchange and temperature, temperature is the dominant factor to determine carbon exchange in mountain meadow grassland.
【学位授予单位】:新疆农业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:S812
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张永稳;郝俊;;阿盟天然林围栏封育效益显著[J];内蒙古林业;1987年07期
2 常雪芹;曹永强;马金祥;;宁夏西吉县草原围栏封育效果调查[J];现代农业科技;2007年20期
3 宝音陶格涛;刘海松;图雅;梁燕;;退化羊草草原围栏封育多样性动态研究[J];中国草地学报;2009年05期
4 勾宁;;沙化草原围栏封育试验效果的观察[J];养殖技术顾问;2013年01期
5 闫虎,沈浩;围栏封育在伊犁昭苏盆地退化草地生态恢复中的应用[J];干旱环境监测;2005年02期
6 屈明亮,赵英,张爱军;乌拉特中旗网围栏封育效益观测分析[J];内蒙古林业;2005年06期
7 孙涛;毕玉芬;赵小社;许岳飞;冯林;金德平;;围栏封育下山地灌草丛草地植被植物多样性与生物量的研究[J];云南农业大学学报;2007年02期
8 安耕;王天河;;围栏封育改良荒漠化草地的效果[J];草业科学;2011年05期
9 龚淑萍;王俊;朱强;;六盘山围栏封育区人工补植中药材自然修复效果分析[J];林业实用技术;2011年11期
10 杨新国;宋乃平;李学斌;刘秉儒;;短期围栏封育对荒漠草原沙化灰钙土有机碳组分及物理稳定性的影响[J];应用生态学报;2012年12期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 朱新萍;贾宏涛;蒋平安;赵成义;胡玉昆;曹叶飞;苏建红;;长期围栏封育对中天山三种类型草地土壤酶活性的影响[A];面向未来的土壤科学(上册)——中国土壤学会第十二次全国会员代表大会暨第九届海峡两岸土壤肥料学术交流研讨会论文集[C];2012年
2 孙磊;张亮;;搞好风沙源草地治理 构筑京津绿色屏障[A];河北省畜牧兽医学会2004年学术年会论文集[C];2004年
3 周国英;陈桂琛;徐文华;杨路存;韩友吉;李锦萍;;围栏封育对青海湖地区芨芨草草原生物量的影响[A];2009中国草原发展论坛论文集[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 记者 赵勇忠;民勤完成草原围栏封育570万亩[N];甘肃经济日报;2012年
2 通讯员 刘佩枫 赖刚;退牧还草 围栏封育 节水灌溉[N];兵团日报(汉);2009年
3 记者 陆建忠;阿盟发展梭梭产业治沙又致富[N];内蒙古日报(汉);2006年
4 记者 秦凤桐 高宁生;宁夏百余万亩草原休养生息[N];新华每日电讯;2000年
5 通讯员 杨世文;沙丘禁牧禁垦沙漠围栏封育荒漠栽种植物[N];兵团日报(汉);2010年
6 赵建宇 记者 王铁一;林业工作今年凸显坡地造林围栏封育两大重点[N];朝阳日报;2013年
7 通讯员刘建刚 成冬云;巴里坤县围栏封育天然草场155万亩[N];哈密日报(汉);2011年
8 于海生、刘树军、侯俊利;承德县京津风沙源治理实现双赢[N];承德日报;2006年
9 本报记者 邹静昭;自然复壮 人退沙退[N];中国环境报;2010年
10 孔令伟 迟占友 田继明 本报首席记者 邱丽娜;百湖大地又添绿装[N];黑龙江经济报;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 张勇娟;围栏封育下蒿类草地群落的变化及其适应性的研究[D];新疆农业大学;2010年
2 李中林;围栏封育和刈割对坝上草原植物多样性、生态位及种间关联的影响[D];安徽师范大学;2015年
3 胡毅;天山北坡草甸草原碳过程及其对围栏封育的响应[D];新疆农业大学;2015年
,本文编号:2331890
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/dongwuyixue/2331890.html