利用甘蔗叶和蛋白桑树配制生长肉牛全混合型压块日粮研究
[Abstract]:The main purpose of this study was to pretreat sugarcane leaves and whole hybrid protein mulberry trees, to select the best treatment methods of sugarcane leaves and whole plant protein mulberry trees, to prepare the whole mixed diet for growing beef cattle, and to carry out feeding experiments and economic benefit evaluation. At the same time, the apparent digestibility and blood biochemical index of each group were measured. In the first part of the experiment, the different pretreatment methods of sugarcane leaves and whole plant protein mulberry were studied. The pretreatment of sugarcane leaves was as follows: control group, ammoniation group, ammonia-alkali group, microstorage group; Study on pretreatment of whole protein mulberry: control group, microstorage group, complex treatment group. The effects of different pretreatment methods on the sensory evaluation of sugarcane leaves and whole plant protein mulberry were studied. The results showed that: (1) the content of DM,CP,EE in sugarcane leaves treated with different treatments was slightly higher than that in the control group, and the content of DM in each group was not significantly different (P0.05), but the content of CP,EE was significantly increased (P0.05). The content of CF,NDF,ADF in sugarcane leaf was significantly decreased (P0.05), and the sensory quality and nutritional value of sugarcane leaf were improved. The CP,EE content of mulberry after complex treatment was higher than that of control group, and the highest CP content in compound treatment group was 26.96% higher than that in control group 20.05% (P0.05), EE content was not significant difference between groups (P0.05); The content of CF was significantly lower than that of control group (P0.05). Microstorage and complex treatment improved the quality, palatability and nutrition of whole protein mulberry. In the second part of the experiment, we used different sugarcane leaves and whole plant protein mulberry to prepare different mixed diets to feed growing beef cattle. The results were as follows: (1) Control group, experiment 1, In experiment 2, the average daily feed intake of each cattle was 17.23 kg / cattle (17.23 kg / kg), and the difference was not significant (P0.05). The maximum daily gain of test-0. 50 kg/d, was 4. 2% higher than that of control group (P0.05). According to the analysis of feed cost per kg, the average feed cost per kg in the test group was 1.24 yuan lower than that in the control group, and the economic benefit was improved. (2) the apparent digestibility of each nutrient was analyzed. The digestibility of DM in experiment 2 was 54.21 and 55.71 respectively. The digestibility of DM in group one was higher than that in control group (P0.05). The digestibility of CP,CF in trial 1 and 2 was higher than that in control group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P0.05). (3) experiment 1, experiment 2, experiment 2: glucose (GLU), a biochemical index of blood of cattle, was added to the diet with proper dosage of whole plant protein mulberry. (3) experiment 1, experiment 2. The levels of cholesterol (CHOL) and triglyceride (TG) were lower than those of the control group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0. 05), which indicated that mulberry leaves had the function of lowering blood glucose and blood lipids. The mechanism of blood lipid and so on provides the reference basis.
【学位授予单位】:广西大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:S823.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张李强;甘蔗越冬贮藏法[J];农村新技术;2004年12期
2 黄艳;;甘蔗及其副产品研究简况[J];世界热带农业信息;2006年12期
3 阎欲晓;吴国燕;杨龙;粟桂娇;;甘蔗叶多酚物质的超声提取及生理活性研究[J];食品研究与开发;2012年04期
4 何元强;欧善生;黄甫;黄茜;;铜与锌硼钼配施对甘蔗产量和品质的影响[J];广东农业科学;2012年14期
5 ;甘蔗剥叶机[J];粮油加工与食品机械;1974年06期
6 ;甘蔗剥叶机[J];粮油加工与食品机械;1975年03期
7 于华光;;用甘蔗尖喂牛过冬的经验[J];中国畜牧学杂志;1959年12期
8 于华光;;用甘蔗尖喂牛过冬的经验[J];中国畜牧学杂志;1959年12期
9 阳小良;唐大学;甘辉;马才伏;沈锦;;一种小型高效甘蔗剥叶机构的研究[J];企业技术开发;2010年05期
10 李明;卢敬铭;韦丽娇;张劲;宋德庆;王金丽;;甘蔗叶机械化粉碎还田技术集成[J];安徽农业科学;2011年08期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 邓怡国;李明;王金丽;黄晖;宋德庆;连文伟;;甘蔗叶粉碎还田技术研究现状与发展趋势[A];热带作物产业带建设规划研讨会——其他热带经济作物产业发展论文集[C];2006年
2 邓怡国;李明;王金丽;黄晖;宋德庆;连文伟;;甘蔗叶粉碎还田技术研究现状与发展趋势[A];农业机械化与新农村建设——中国农业机械学会2006年学术年会论文集(下册)[C];2006年
3 刘少春;张跃彬;侯良宪;曾瑞芬;;滇东南旱地甘蔗穴植增产机理研究[A];作物科学研究理论与实践——'2000作物科学学术研讨会文集[C];2001年
4 陈由强;何炜;叶冰莹;陈如凯;;甘蔗F2KP基因的克隆及序列分析[A];中国植物生理学会第十次会员代表大会暨全国学术年会论文摘要汇编[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 本报记者 江东洲 刘昊;“大家伙”收甘蔗:一台能抵三十人[N];科技日报;2011年
2 龚锐云邋陈松金;长泰民警浴火扑救甘蔗林[N];人民公安报;2008年
3 武汉珈和科技有限公司 陈淑敏;今年甘蔗长势较好 有望迎来丰产年[N];期货日报;2014年
4 记者 吴梅 通讯员 余凯;柳江全县统保甘蔗火灾保险[N];广西日报;2006年
5 记者 陈云芬;技术创新加快制糖副产物高效利用[N];云南日报;2010年
6 金平县科技局 尹子辉;甘蔗栽培技术要点[N];云南科技报;2013年
7 ;甘蔗良种[N];云南科技报;2003年
8 本报记者 胡奎;甘蔗:“甜蜜”产业的“蝴蝶效应”[N];黔西南日报;2012年
9 记者 周文涛 通讯员 李文静;崇左推广甘蔗尾叶青贮养牛技术[N];广西日报;2004年
10 ;甘蔗尾叶青贮养牛[N];云南科技报;2005年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 赵毅;甘蔗多酚分离鉴定及生物活性研究[D];华南理工大学;2015年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 陈丽芬;用于厌氧发酵的甘蔗叶预处理研究[D];江西农业大学;2013年
2 吕冠霖;利用甘蔗叶和蛋白桑树配制生长肉牛全混合型压块日粮研究[D];广西大学;2015年
3 叶园伟;甘蔗叶发酵预处理碎解机关键技术研究[D];海南大学;2012年
4 杨喜;甘蔗叶粉碎机关键部件虚拟分析及优化[D];海南大学;2014年
5 谢梦醒;环嗪酮·敌草隆在甘蔗、土壤中的残留消解动态及敌草隆的土壤吸附行为研究[D];安徽农业大学;2010年
,本文编号:2339297
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/dongwuyixue/2339297.html