三种方式对足月羊水偏少孕妇引产的效果对比分析
本文选题:人工破膜 + 催产素 ; 参考:《湖南师范大学学报(医学版)》2016年05期
【摘要】:目的 :对比分析人工破膜+小剂量米索、催产素点滴引产、人工破膜联合催产素三种方法对足月羊水偏少孕妇的引产效果。方法 :对本院妇产科2011年7月~2014年12月227例足月羊水偏少孕妇的引产情况进行总结分析,其中人工破膜+催产素点滴69例(A组)、催产素点滴88例(B组)、人工破膜+小剂量米索70例(C组),对比三组的引产效果及未产结局差异。结果 :进行引产处理后三组产妇的宫颈Bishop评分均逐渐提高,在引产处理后第4、8、12h C组的Bishop评分评分显著的高于A、B组;在引产处理后第4、8、12h A组的Bishop评分评分显著的高于B组。C组的临产时间、总产程显著的低于A、B组;A组的临产时间、总产程显著的低于B组。C组的剖宫产率显著的低于A、B组;C两组的第1min 5min Apgar评分显著的高于B组。结论 :人工破膜+小剂量米索对足月羊水偏少孕妇的引产效果安全有效。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare and analyze the effect of three methods of artificial membrane breaking, oxytocin induced labor and artificial membrane breaking combined with oxytocin on term amniotic fluid oligohydramnios. Methods: from July 2011 to December 2014, 227 pregnant women with term amniotic fluid oligohydramnios in our hospital were analyzed. Among them, 69 cases were treated with oxytocin, 88 cases were treated with oxytocin, and 70 cases were treated with small dose of misoprostol. The results of induction of labor and the outcome of labor failure were compared among the three groups. Results: the cervix Bishop scores of the three groups increased gradually after induced labor treatment. The Bishop score of group C was significantly higher than that of group B at 812 h after induced labor treatment. The Bishop score of group A was significantly higher than that of group B and group C, and the total labor process was significantly lower than that of group A at 8h after induced labor. The rate of cesarean section in group C was significantly lower than that in group B (P < 0.05). The score of 1min 5min Apgar in group C was significantly higher than that in group B. Conclusion: it is safe and effective to induce labor in term amniotic fluid oligohydramnios with low dose of misoprostol.
【作者单位】: 江苏省昆山第四人民医院;江苏省昆山市第一人民医院友谊院区产科;
【分类号】:R719.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张艺青,梁捍真;羊水过少51例分析[J];中国实用妇科与产科杂志;2000年03期
2 吴炜英,金素珍;羊水过少108例分析[J];浙江临床医学;2000年08期
3 缪玉梅,程玉珍;羊水过少97例分析[J];徐州医学院学报;2000年01期
4 胡凌云;羊水过少90例临床分析[J];实用医技;2000年06期
5 高慧卿;羊水过少87例分析[J];广州医药;2001年02期
6 唐双玲,黄爱媛;羊水过少103例临床分析[J];湖南医学;2001年06期
7 张云娟;羊水过少的临床探讨[J];遵义医学院学报;2001年02期
8 白引娣;羊水过少106例临床分析[J];陕西医学杂志;2002年02期
9 何玉,晋茂生;羊水过少57例分析[J];蚌埠医学院学报;2002年05期
10 白岩 ,王岩;羊水过少72例分析[J];甘肃科技;2002年Z1期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 李静;杨世萍;;羊水过少临床分析[A];全国妇产科护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2007年
2 金芙蓉;郑彤彤;潘一红;张玲;;羊水过少342例临床探讨[A];第四届长三角妇产科学术论坛暨浙江省2009年妇产科学术年会论文汇编[C];2009年
3 秦海鹰;杨柏柳;仇秋明;;136例羊水过少病例的分析[A];第八次全国妇产科学学术会议论文汇编[C];2004年
4 张逢香;;羊水过少98例分析[A];第三次全国妇产科基层医师学术会议资料汇编[C];2005年
5 邵彩珠;胡梅青;顾雷君;;舟山海岛468例羊水过少临床分析[A];2007年浙江省妇产科学围产医学联合学术年会论文汇编[C];2007年
6 何尧;方敏;周夫群;董e,
本文编号:1967010
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/fuchankeerkelunwen/1967010.html