当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 外科论文 >

3D打印技术在复杂髋臼骨折手术治疗中的应用

发布时间:2018-03-02 20:20

  本文选题:3D打印技术 切入点:髋臼 出处:《河南中医药大学》2016年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:目的探究应用3D打印技术辅助治疗复杂型髋臼骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2013年10月至2015年10月期间收治、由同一医师进行手术的的68例复杂髋臼骨折患者,其中男43例、女25例,年龄分布为24~56岁(平均36.4岁)。依Judet-Letournel分型为:双柱骨折17例,后壁+后柱骨折22例,后壁+横行骨折18例,T型骨折5例,前柱+前壁骨折6例。损伤因素:交通伤37例,坠落伤21例,建筑伤10例。合并伤:四肢骨折47例,骨盆骨折53例,颅脑损伤25例,休克18例,泌尿系损伤21例,脏器损伤11例,神经损伤8例。受伤至手术时间为2~14d(平均6.8d)。其中28例患者经螺旋CT扫描、三维快速成形术、计算机模拟及个体标本模拟手术,并根据术前计划进行手术(3D组);40例患者采取常规术前检查及手术(常规组)。运用统计学软件分析比较两组患者的切口长度、手术时间、出血量、骨折复位情况、手术并发症、后期髋关节功能恢复情况。结果本课题所有数据经严格要求搜集、审核与整理后显示:术前两组患者性别、年龄、受伤至手术时间、骨折分型、受伤原因及合并伤等一般资料无显著差异(P0.05),具有可比性。3D组患者术中出血量、手术时间、切口长度均明显低于常规组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后一周骨折复位情况检查显示:常规组20例解剖复位、15例复位满意、5例复位不满意,满意率为87.5%,3D组23例解剖复位、4例复位满意、1例复位不满意,满意率96.4%,两组患者复位情况差异具有统计学意义(P0.05),表明3D组术后骨折复位情况明显优于常规组。所有患者均采用门诊随访、视频随访、电话随访等方式复查髋关节功能恢复及并发症情况,随访时间为6~18个月(平均12.6月),末次随访髋关节功能评分显示:常规组17例优、11例良、9例可、3例差,优良率为70.0%,3D组23例优、3例良、1例可、1例差,优良率为92.9%,两组复位情况差异具有统计学意义(P0.05),表明3D组术后髋关节功能评分明显优于常规组。并发症情况:3D组、常规组分别出现股骨头坏死0例、2例,二期均给予全髋置换术处理,创伤性关节炎2例、7例,异位骨化2例、6例,8例术前神经损伤患者末次随访时均基本恢复,两组患者术后均未出现切口感染、静脉血栓等其他并发症,两组并发症差异比较具有统计学意义(P0.05),3D组并发症发生率为14.3%,常规组并发症发生率为37.5%,与常规组相比,3D组并发症发生率明显较低。结论1.在复杂髋臼骨折治疗中应用3D打印技术,能简化手术操作步骤、缩短手术时间,减少术中创伤及失血量、提高解剖复位率、降低术后并发症发生率、改善后期关节功能,相对于传统常规手术方式具有较大优势。2.应用3D打印技术能提高复杂髋臼骨折手术治疗质量,优化复杂髋臼骨折手术治疗方案,使髋臼骨折患者在受到“一次打击”后的“二次打击”最小化,对骨科医师临床治疗具有较好的指导意义。
[Abstract]:Objective to explore the clinical efficacy of 3D printing technique in the treatment of complex acetabular fractures. Methods 68 patients with complex acetabular fractures treated by the same physician from October 2013 to October 2015 were retrospectively analyzed, including 43 males. According to Judet-Letournel classification, there were 17 cases of double column fracture, 22 cases of posterior column fracture, 18 cases of posterior wall transverse fracture, 6 cases of anterior column fracture and 6 cases of anterior column fracture. There were 21 cases of falling injury, 10 cases of building injury, 47 cases of limb fracture, 53 cases of pelvic fracture, 25 cases of craniocerebral injury, 18 cases of shock, 21 cases of urinary system injury and 11 cases of visceral injury. There were 8 cases of nerve injury. The time from injury to operation was 214d (mean 6.8 days). Among them, 28 patients underwent spiral CT scan, three-dimensional rapid angioplasty, computer simulation and individual specimen simulation surgery. According to the preoperative plan, 40 patients in the 3D group underwent routine preoperative examination and operation (routine group). The incision length, operative time, bleeding volume, fracture reduction, and surgical complications were analyzed and compared by statistical software between the two groups. Results all the data were collected, examined and sorted out: sex, age, time from injury to operation, fracture classification, and so on. There was no significant difference in general data of injury cause and complicated injury (P 0.05). The amount of intraoperative bleeding, operation time and incision length in the comparable. 3D group were significantly lower than those in the routine group. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). The results of reduction examination at one week after operation showed that 20 cases of anatomical reduction in routine group were satisfactory in 15 cases and satisfactory in 5 cases, and the satisfaction rate was 87.5% in 23 cases of anatomic reduction and 4 cases of satisfactory reduction in 1 case. The satisfaction rate was 96.4. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P 0.05), which indicated that the reduction of fracture in the 3D group was better than that in the routine group. All the patients were followed up by outpatient and video. The functional recovery and complications of hip joint were reexamined by telephone follow-up. The follow-up time was 6 ~ 18 months (mean 12.6 months). The score of hip joint function in the last follow-up group showed that 17 cases were excellent and 11 cases were good and 9 cases were good and 3 cases were poor. The excellent and good rate was 70.0%. In the 3D group, 23 cases were excellent, 3 cases were good and 1 case was good, and the excellent and good rate was 92.9%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P 0.05), which indicated that the score of hip joint function in the 3D group was obviously better than that in the routine group. In the routine group, there were 0 cases of osteonecrosis of femoral head, 2 cases were treated with total hip replacement, 2 cases were traumatic arthritis, 6 cases were ectopic ossification, and 8 cases had nerve injury before operation. No incision infection, venous thrombosis and other complications were found in both groups. The difference of complications between the two groups was statistically significant. The incidence of complications in the 3D group was 14.33.The complication rate in the routine group was 37.5. Compared with the conventional group, the incidence of complications in the 3D group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group. Conclusion 1.The technique of 3D printing was used in the treatment of complex acetabular fractures. It can simplify the operation procedure, shorten the operation time, reduce the trauma and blood loss during operation, increase the rate of anatomical reduction, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, and improve the function of joint in the later stage. Compared with the conventional operation, 3D printing technique can improve the quality of surgical treatment of complex acetabular fractures and optimize the surgical treatment of complex acetabular fractures. So that the patients with acetabular fracture can be minimized after "one strike", which has a good guiding significance for orthopedic physicians in clinical treatment.
【学位授予单位】:河南中医药大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R687.3;TP391.73

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 杨维全,张桂芳;髋臼骨折漏诊5例原因分析[J];中原医刊;2000年06期

2 黄传俊,徐松,张明建;手术治疗移位髋臼骨折17例体会[J];江苏临床医学杂志;2000年06期

3 杨雷,洪汝康,王振文,黄俊武,陈华;54例髋臼骨折的治疗分析[J];中国中医骨伤科杂志;2000年02期

4 王卫中,成德元,苑方昌,王世界;45例髋臼骨折的诊断与治疗分析[J];中国矫形外科杂志;2000年08期

5 付鹏军,尹锐锋,李振武,刘斌元,汪瑞东;髋臼骨折的早期治疗[J];中医正骨;2000年10期

6 王开友,姜尚玉;不同类型的髋臼骨折手术治疗回顾[J];青岛医药卫生;2000年03期

7 锡林宝勒日;白靖平;;髋臼骨折[J];新疆医学;2000年01期

8 陈金福,胡辉东;复杂髋臼骨折16例手术治疗分析[J];南京医科大学学报;2001年03期

9 陆晓文,刘同行,羊国民,徐国平,陈步俊;髋臼骨折手术治疗32例分析[J];镇江医学院学报;2001年04期

10 周瑞红;髋臼骨折的治疗方法探讨[J];中国煤炭工业医学杂志;2001年07期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 许硕贵;;利用髋臼三维记忆内固定系统治疗特殊型A类髋臼骨折[A];2009第十七届全国中西医结合骨伤科学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2009年

2 张春才;刘欣伟;许硕贵;禹宝庆;苏佳灿;牛云飞;付青格;徐永清;阮默;黄继峰;陈庄洪;沈惠良;刘利民;王家让;王愉思;王振昊;刘文德;李文锐;王仁;丛永健;;应用浮动分类法分析506例髋臼骨折:回顾性、多中心研究[A];第七届全国创伤学术会议暨2009海峡两岸创伤医学论坛论文汇编[C];2009年

3 苏继承;曲天义;张喜秋;;复杂髋臼骨折的治疗——附27例报告[A];第11届全国中西医结合骨伤科学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2003年

4 刘又文;耿捷;;手术治疗髋臼骨折60例探析[A];中华中医药学会骨伤分会第四届第三次学术年会暨国家中医药管理局“十一五”重点专科(专病)建设骨伤协作组经验交流会论文汇编[C];2008年

5 吴会祥;潘年进;杨梓江;;复杂髋臼骨折16例手术治疗体会[A];2009第一届贵州骨科论坛论文汇编[C];2009年

6 梁伟国;;移位髋臼骨折的手术治疗[A];第七届全国创伤学术会议暨2009海峡两岸创伤医学论坛论文汇编[C];2009年

7 许硕贵;张春才;王家林;纪方;王冠军;付青格;牛云飞;刘欣伟;;利用髋臼三维记忆内固定系统治疗特殊型A类髋臼骨折[A];第七届全国创伤学术会议暨2009海峡两岸创伤医学论坛论文汇编[C];2009年

8 管学懋;樊晓峰;李林;戴云飞;;髋臼骨折手术治疗26例疗效分析[A];第七届全国创伤学术会议暨2009海峡两岸创伤医学论坛论文汇编[C];2009年

9 毛伟民;徐荣明;胡勇;;手术治疗髋臼骨折62例报告[A];2003年全国骨关节损伤专题研讨会论文汇编[C];2003年

10 杜文延;;髋臼骨折的手术治疗[A];第五次全国创伤康复暨第七次全国运动疗法学术会议论文汇编[C];2004年

相关重要报纸文章 前5条

1 王振岭邋杨红亮;髋臼骨折基础与临床研究获系列成果[N];中国医药报;2007年

2 王振岭邋杨红亮;从基础到临床探讨髋臼骨折[N];健康报;2007年

3 王美珍;全国第八届骨盆与髋臼骨折诊疗新进展研讨会在首府召开[N];内蒙古日报(汉);2008年

4 湖南长沙市第八医院骨科主任医师 祝天经;髋臼骨折 螺钉不必“常规”取[N];健康报;2009年

5 杨丽佳;提高骨盆骨折治愈率[N];健康报;2005年

相关博士学位论文 前7条

1 庄研;改良双切口微创入路治疗髋臼骨折的解剖学及临床研究[D];南方医科大学;2016年

2 查国春;老年髋臼骨折相关临床与生物力学研究[D];苏州大学;2015年

3 周钢;髋臼骨折手术治疗的临床研究和荟萃分析[D];南方医科大学;2014年

4 宋朝晖;髋臼骨折对髋关节生物力学行为的影响及相关研究[D];河北医科大学;2004年

5 万岷;髋臼三维记忆内固定系统治疗髋臼骨折的相关机理研究[D];第二军医大学;2005年

6 杨明辉;1.髋臼后壁骨折手术治疗的疗效分析 2.计算机辅助CT测算髋关节接触面积在髋臼骨折术后的初步应用[D];北京大学;2007年

7 王庆贤;髋臼骨折的生物力学及相关研究[D];河北医科大学;2003年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 郭卫宾;改良Stoppa入路与腹直肌旁入路治疗髋臼骨折疗效比较[D];山西医科大学;2016年

2 王晓峰;老年移位髋臼骨折的手术治疗[D];苏州大学;2016年

3 贺宇;有限元分析与快速成型技术在涉及四边体的髋臼骨折治疗中的应用[D];山东大学;2016年

4 李凯锋;三种内固定材料固定髋臼骨折的基础与临床对比研究[D];新乡医学院;2015年

5 夏广;髋臼骨折腹直肌外侧入路解剖学研究及临床应用[D];南方医科大学;2016年

6 邵晏清;经单一切口三种前方入路治疗髋臼骨折的临床疗效比较[D];南方医科大学;2016年

7 宋仕刚;复杂髋臼骨折早期手术中应用腹主动脉球囊阻断控制出血的效果评价及相关因素分析[D];昆明医科大学;2016年

8 蒋锋;组合髂腹股沟切口治疗髋臼骨折的解剖与临床研究[D];南华大学;2016年

9 王锋;3D打印技术在髋臼骨折手术治疗中的应用及疗效观察[D];湖北中医药大学;2016年

10 史炎鑫;3D打印技术在复杂髋臼骨折手术治疗中的应用[D];河南中医药大学;2016年



本文编号:1558025

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/1558025.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户7faa6***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com