当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 外科论文 >

不同的疼痛管理模式对关节镜下创伤后伸膝装置粘连松解的疗效分析

发布时间:2018-11-05 12:43
【摘要】:目的探讨不同疼痛管理模式对膝关节镜下行伸膝装置黏连松解的伸直型膝关节僵硬患者术后镇痛效果及疗效分析。方法将于2012年1月至2016年9月在广西医科大学一附院创伤骨科手外科同一治疗小组膝关节镜下行伸膝装置黏连松解术的41例伸直型膝关节僵硬患者按其不同镇痛模式分为2组,其中将术后口服塞来昔布为术后镇痛方案的21膝患者为A组,将术前口服塞来昔布及联合术中关节腔注射“鸡尾酒”多模式疼痛管理为术后镇痛方案的20膝患者为B组,回顾性分析其治疗效果,随访时间6个月,以视觉疼痛模拟评分量表(VSA)评价患者术后镇痛效果,以膝关节屈曲改变角度及外科特种医院膝关节评分(HHS)评估患者术后1个月、3个月、6个月患膝功能改善情况。结果1、术后12小时、1天、2天,静息状态下,患膝关节VAS评分B组比A组小,P小于0.05,差异有统计学意义。术后3天、4天,静息状态下,患膝关节VAS评分B组与A组大至相当,P大于0.05,差异无统计学意义。2、术后2天、3天,被动活动时患膝关节VAS评分B组比A组小,P小于0.05,差异有统计学意义。术后1周,被动活动时,患膝关节VAS评分B组与A组大至相当,P大于0.05,差异无统计学意义。3、术后2天、14天,主动活动时患膝关节屈曲角度B组比A组大,P小于0.05,差异有统计学意义,术后1个月、3个月、6个月,主动活动时,B组与A组屈曲角度大至相当,P大于0.05,差异无统计学意义。4、A组术前、术后HHS膝关节功能评分比较P小于0.01,差异有统计学意义。B组术前、术后HHS膝关节功能评分比较P小于0.01,差异有统计学意义。结论在关节镜行伸膝装置黏连松解术的伸直型膝关节僵硬患者,采用多模式疼痛管理能明显减轻患者术后48h的疼痛程度,提高总体满意度且能明显改善在关节镜行伸膝装置黏连松解术的伸直型膝关节僵硬患者术后2d、14d的膝关节活动度(ROM),增加患者康复的信心。但对1、3、6个月后膝关节主动活动度及HHS膝关节功能评分无改善。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the analgesic effect and curative effect of different pain management models in patients with extensional knee joint stiffness under knee arthroscopy. Methods from January 2012 to September 2016, 41 patients with ankylosis were divided into two groups according to their different analgesic modes. Among them, 21 knee patients who took celecoxib as postoperative analgesic regimen were selected as group A, and 20 knee patients who were treated with preoperative oral celecoxib and intraoperative "cocktail" multi-mode pain management as postoperative analgesic regimen were selected as group B. The therapeutic effect was analyzed retrospectively and followed up for 6 months. The postoperative analgesic effect was evaluated by visual pain analogue scale (VSA). Knee function improvement was evaluated 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after operation by knee flexion angle and knee joint score (HHS) in special surgery hospital. Results 1. At 12 hours, 1 day, 2 days after operation, the VAS score of knee joint in group B was smaller than that in group A (P < 0.05). The VAS score of knee joint in group B was as large as that in group A (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between group B and group A (P > 0.05). 2, 2 days and 3 days after operation, the VAS score of knee joint in group B was smaller than that in group A. P < 0.05, the difference was statistically significant. At 1 week after operation, the VAS score of knee joint in group B was as large as that in group A (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between group B and group A (P > 0.05). 2 and 14 days after operation, the flexion angle of knee joint in group B was larger than that in group A. P < 0.05, the difference was statistically significant. After 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after operation, the flexion angle of group B and group A was equal to that of group A. there was no significant difference between group A and group A before operation. Postoperative HHS knee joint function score P < 0.01, the difference was statistically significant, group B before and after HHS knee joint function score P < 0.01, the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion Multi-mode pain management can significantly reduce the degree of pain 48 hours after arthroscopy in patients with extensional knee stiffness treated with knee extension device and loosening. Increasing overall satisfaction and significantly improving the (ROM), of knee motion in patients with extensional knee stiffness treated with arthroscopic extension device and loosening increased the patients' confidence in rehabilitation. But there was no improvement in knee active motion and HHS knee function score after 1: 3 and 6 months.
【学位授予单位】:广西医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R687.4

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 孔祥朋;任鹏;倪明;李想;陈继营;柴伟;;全膝关节置换术中三阶段关节腔周围注射鸡尾酒与股神经阻滞镇痛效果的比较[J];中国骨与关节杂志;2016年10期

2 花奇凯;吴鸿彬;冼呈;赵良军;李巍;赵劲民;;关节镜下治疗创伤后膝关节僵硬26例[J];广西医科大学学报;2016年03期

3 赵新文;李钊;姬振伟;王志学;丁勇;;序贯性手术治疗Ⅰ型膝关节僵直的临床疗效分析[J];中国骨与关节损伤杂志;2015年08期

4 陈大康;程智涛;;关节镜辅助下联合小切口松解治疗膝关节僵直的疗效分析[J];创伤外科杂志;2014年06期

5 夏小萍;朱蓓蓓;梁樱;马正良;韩克;朱湘红;汤小秋;;右美托咪定静脉输注联合罗哌卡因局部浸润在腹腔镜妇科手术镇痛的效果[J];临床麻醉学杂志;2014年10期

6 冯建来;赵艳玲;闫洪涛;支世保;;关节镜下治疗膝关节僵直的疗效观察[J];中国疗养医学;2013年02期

7 秦国斌;;关节镜辅助松解治疗膝关节僵硬116列临床分析[J];中国内镜杂志;2012年03期

8 崔志刚;刘四海;薛祖军;韩新祚;冯建璞;刘克敏;;膝关节周围不同部位骨折致膝关节僵直特点分析及早期康复疗效[J];中国康复理论与实践;2010年11期

9 王建华;赵金忠;何耀华;皇甫小桥;袁峰;彭晓春;;严重膝关节伸直挛缩的微创治疗[J];中华骨科杂志;2006年05期

10 许建波,王战朝;创伤后膝关节僵硬与股四头肌成形术及其功能锻炼[J];中国临床康复;2005年02期



本文编号:2312124

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2312124.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户0a59a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com