当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 心血管论文 >

112例急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死后心脏破裂患者的临床特点分析

发布时间:2018-05-31 15:18

  本文选题:急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死 + 心脏破裂 ; 参考:《吉林大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:目的分析急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(ST-elevation myocardial infarction,STEMI)患者并发心脏破裂(cadiac rupture,CR)的临床特点,探索STEMI后CR的危险因素,探究临床防治措施。方法连续入选于2014年1月至2016年12月期间就诊于吉林大学第一医院心血管疾病诊疗中心并诊断为STEMI并发CR患者共112例,定义为破裂组,按照1:3匹配原则,匹配条件为相同性别及年龄±1岁,随机选取与CR组同年入院且未发生心脏破裂的336例STEMI患者作为非破裂组,记录入选患者在院期间一般资料、检验检查结果、病情变化、冠脉造影情况以及治疗情况,对STEMI后CR患者临床特点进行总结,利用统计学分析发现STEMI后CR的危险因素。结果1、3年间ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者共6007例,并发CR患者共112例,STEMI后CR发病率为1.9%,其中FWR共82例(71.9%),VSR共31例(27.2%),PMR共1例(0.9%),两例患者在院期间先后发生VSR、FWR。112例STEMI合并CR患者平均年龄为(68.9±9.74)岁,其中男性52人,女性60人。2、STEMI患者发生CR前常常存在诱因,包括用力排大小便,剧烈恶心、呕吐,情绪激动,反复胸痛等。3、CR多发生在STEMI起病1周内,本研究中91%的CR发生在STEMI起病一周内。其中24小时内发生CR患者共61人,占总人数54%,3~5天发生CR患者共25人,占总人数22%。4、STEMI并发CR患者中,急性前壁心肌梗死患者共63例,其中出现FWR共52例(81.2%),出现VSR共12例(18.8%),1例患者同时发生FWR、VSR。急性下壁心肌梗死患者共35例,其中出现FWR共21例(60%),出现VSR共13例(37.1%),出现pmr共1例(2.9%)。急性前壁心肌梗死合并下壁心肌梗死患者共9例,其中出现fwr共4例(40%),出现vsr共6例(60%),1例患者同时发生fwr、vsr。急性侧壁心肌梗死患者共5例,均为fwr。5、两组单因素分析中,(1)基本资料方面,心脏破裂组与非心脏破裂组性别比例相同、年龄相近。cr组患者既往高血压病史、糖尿病病史、脑卒中病史的比例高于非cr组(p0.05),既往心肌梗死病史、吸烟史比例低于非cr组(p0.05)。(2)入院后常规检验方面,cr组患者白细胞计数、中性粒细胞计数、中性粒细胞百分比、单核细胞计数、随机血糖、凝血酶原时间、门冬氨酸氨基转移酶、丙氨酸氨基转移酶、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶、总胆红素、直接胆红素、空腹血糖水平高于对照组(p0.05),而嗜酸性粒细胞计数、淋巴细胞百分比、血清钠离子水平低于对照组(p0.05)。(3)心肌梗死相关情况方面,cr患者入院收缩压低于对照组(p0.05),cr组患者入院后心率、肌钙蛋白i峰值、d-二聚体、bnp、前壁心肌梗死比例、killip分级iii级~iv级比例、心肌梗死后反复胸痛比例高于对照组(p0.05)。(4)冠脉造影结果方面,非cr组有较好的侧支循环(p0.05)。(5)治疗方面,非cr组使用指南推荐药物及直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(primarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention,ppci)均较cr组更加完善(p0.05)。6、应用条件logistic进行多因素分析,结果显示入院低收缩压(or=0.984,95%ci:0.975~0.994)、入院心率快(or=1.021,95%ci:1.007~1.037)、心肌梗死后反复胸痛(or=11.947,95%ci:3.639~39.218)、白细胞计数升高(or=1.105,95%ci:1.03~1.185)、中性粒细胞百分比升高(or=17.089,95%ci:1.216~240.221)是stemi患者并发cr的独立危险因素。结论1、stemi后cr的发病率为1.9%,并不多见,其中左室游离壁破裂比较常见。2、cr多发生在stemi起病1周内,其中两个高发时间分别为起病24小时内及起病后3~5天。3、stemi并发cr的危险因素包括入院低收缩压、心率快、心肌梗死后反复胸痛、白细胞计数升高、中性粒细胞百分比升高。
[Abstract]:Objective to analyze the clinical characteristics of cardiac rupture (cadiac rupture, CR) in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (ST-elevation myocardial infarction, STEMI), to explore the risk factors of CR in STEMI after STEMI, and to explore the clinical prevention and treatment measures. Methods to be selected from January 2014 to December 2016 to visit the cardiovascular system of No.1 Hospital of Jilin University. The center of disease diagnosis and treatment was diagnosed as 112 cases of STEMI complicated with CR, defined as the rupture group. According to the 1:3 matching principle, the matching conditions were the same sex and age of 1 years, and 336 cases of STEMI patients who were admitted to the same year with the CR group without rupture of the heart were selected as the non rupture group, and the general data of the hospitalized patients were recorded and the results were tested. The clinical features of patients with CR after STEMI were summarized, and the risk factors of CR after STEMI were analyzed by statistical analysis. Results there were 6007 cases of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in 1,3, 112 cases with CR patients and 1.9% of CR incidence after STEMI, of which 82 cases (71.9%) were FWR, 27.2% (27.2%), 27.2% (27.2%). 27.2% PMR 1 cases (0.9%), two patients had VSR during the hospital, and the average age of FWR.112 STEMI combined with CR was (68.9 + 9.74) years old, of which 52 men and 60 women were.2, and STEMI patients were often induced before CR, including severe bowel movement, severe nausea, vomiting, emotional excitement, repeated chest pain and.3, CR more occurring in STEMI 1 weeks. Within this study, 91% of the CR occurred within one week of the onset of STEMI. Among them, 61 were CR patients in 24 hours, the total number was 54%, and CR patients were 25, accounting for 22%.4, and 63 cases of acute anterior wall myocardial infarction in STEMI complicated with CR patients. There were 52 cases (81.2%) with FWR, 12 cases in 18.8% (18.8%), and 1 patients simultaneously FW. There were 35 cases of acute lower wall myocardial infarction in R and VSR., of which there were 21 cases of FWR (60%), 13 cases (37.1%) and 1 cases of PMR (2.9%). There were 9 cases of acute anterior wall myocardial infarction combined with inferior wall myocardial infarction, of which there were 4 cases of FWR (40%), 6 (60%) occurred in VSR, FWR in 1 cases, and acute side wall myocardial infarction in vsr. patients. For example, fwr.5, two groups of single factor analysis, (1) basic data, the heart rupture group and the non heart rupture group had the same sex ratio. The history of hypertension, the history of diabetes and the history of stroke were higher than that of the non CR group (P0.05). The history of myocardial infarction was lower than that of the non CR group (P0.05). (2) admission to hospital. (2) admission to hospital. In the routine test, the leukocyte count, neutrophils count, neutrophils percentage, mononuclear cell count, random blood sugar, prothrombin time, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma glutamyl transpeptidase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, and fasting blood glucose level were higher than those of the control group (P0.05) in the CR group. The level of acid granulocyte count, lymphocyte percentage and serum sodium ion were lower than that of the control group (P0.05). (3) the systolic pressure of Cr patients was lower than that of the control group (P0.05). The heart rate, the peak of cardiac troponin I, the d- two polymer, the proportion of BNP, the anterior wall myocardial infarction, the III grade ~iv grade ratio of Killip classification, the myocardial infarction in the CR group were lower than the control group (P0.05). The proportion of postoperative recurrent chest pain was higher than that of the control group (P0.05). (4) the results of coronary angiography, non CR group had better collateral circulation (P0.05). (5) the treatment, non CR guidelines recommended drugs and direct percutaneous coronary intervention (primarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention, PPCI) were more perfect than the CR group (P0.05).6, the application of logistic. Multifactor analysis showed low systolic pressure (or=0.984,95%ci:0.975~0.994), fast hospitalization heart rate (or=1.021,95%ci:1.007~1.037), repeated chest pain (or=11.947,95%ci:3.639~39.218) after myocardial infarction, increased leukocyte count (or=1.105,95%ci:1.03~1.185), and increased neutrophil percentage (or=17.089,95%ci:1.216~240.221) was ste. Conclusion the incidence of Cr in MI patients was 1, and the incidence of Cr after STEMI was 1.9%. The left ventricular wall rupture was common.2 and Cr occurred more than 1 weeks in the onset of STEMI, and two of the high onset times were 24 hours of onset and 3~5 days after onset respectively. The risk factors for STEMI and Cr were low systolic pressure and fast heart rate. Repeated chest pain after myocardial infarction increased white blood cell count and increased neutrophil percentage.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R542.22

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 张宏伟,何明艳;腹部刀刺伤致心脏破裂1例[J];山西临床医药;2000年07期

2 周栋,黄维坤,孙新平,顾琦,杨旭凯;心脏破裂伤抢救成功1例[J];武警医学;2000年05期

3 刘宏业,郝显忠,刘金成;心脏破裂二例的救治[J];中国修复重建外科杂志;2000年03期

4 姜朝晖,赵荣,成彬,景友杰,孙晓欧,王刚;心脏破裂存活1例[J];中国实用内科杂志;2001年05期

5 范慧敏,刘泳,陈国涵,卢蓉,郭建华,袁国庆,刘中民;心脏破裂16例临床分析[J];上海医学;2002年12期

6 侯玉山,郭金堂,丁晓峰,李树文,李文魁;刀刺伤性心脏破裂的急救[J];临床医药实践;2003年05期

7 张文平,田步升,林文杰;心脏破裂9例分析[J];中国误诊学杂志;2003年01期

8 沈霞,林艳;心脏破裂抢救成功1例[J];华中医学杂志;2004年06期

9 位兰玲,邢卿,刁玉筌;心脏破裂伤时心电监护与急救[J];实用心电学杂志;2005年05期

10 樊伍峰,高水清;心脏破裂的非常规救治3例报告[J];咸宁学院学报(医学版);2005年04期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 李鸿伟;沈琦斌;余才华;;心脏破裂的诊断与处理[A];2008年浙江省胸心外科学学术年会暨浙江省医学会胸心外科学分会体外循环学组、胸腔镜学组成立大会论文汇编[C];2008年

2 刘建军;王新民;宗刚;;自发性心脏破裂死亡一例[A];中国法医学会法医临床学学术研讨会论文集[C];2003年

3 孔传兴;蒙加付;王兴;耿长友;;开放性心脏破裂抢救存活3例分析[A];中国法医学会全国第十一次法医临床学学术研讨会论文集[C];2008年

4 陈少华;兰玲;马文菲;刘佳妮;郑雅莉;曾艳;叶珊;王万荣;刘启功;;冠心病急性心肌梗死患者住院期间心脏破裂及其相关因素[A];第十三次全国心血管病学术会议论文集[C];2011年

5 王复琼;章正碧;尹旖旎;张崇莹;罗慧琴;;20例心脏破裂的护理体会[A];2012贵州省医学会胸心血管外科年会论文集[C];2012年

6 卢中秋;孙成超;黄唯佳;李景荣;李惠萍;;闭合钝性伤致心脏破裂的救治[A];中华医学会急诊分会第五届全国危重病学术交流会论文汇编[C];2004年

7 王春燕;宋亿光;康智华;;自发性心脏破裂致心包积血2例[A];全国第七次法医学术交流会论文摘要集[C];2004年

8 吴立萍;;一例心脏破裂行心包穿刺引流术的护理[A];全国心脏内、外科专科护理学术会议论文汇编[C];2005年

9 周起;马丽霞;;脚踩胸部致心脏破裂2例[A];全国第六次法医学术交流会论文摘要集[C];2000年

10 李宝增;孙坤伟;;心脏穿透性破裂迟发症状出现一例[A];中国法医学会法医临床学学术研讨会论文集[C];2005年

相关重要报纸文章 前4条

1 河北省承德市中心医院心胸外科副主任医师 李晓峰 王春艳 整理;如何应对心脏破裂后的“急”与“危”[N];健康报;2013年

2 蒋廷玉 陈步伟 邵云;心脏破裂 医院手续全免先救人获得新生 患者及时足额交费用[N];新华日报;2007年

3 时报记者 张一弛;体罚出意外 老师担何责[N];滨海时报;2011年

4 许锦东;警惕心梗病人恢复期猝死[N];中国老年报;2002年

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 杨毅宁;年龄相关的基质金属蛋白酶(MMP-2、MMP-9)表达差异对小鼠急性心肌梗死后心脏破裂及早期左室重塑的影响[D];新疆医科大学;2006年

相关硕士学位论文 前8条

1 陈卫强;32例急性心肌梗死合并心脏破裂院内死亡病例的临床特征[D];天津医科大学;2016年

2 林珊珊;112例急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死后心脏破裂患者的临床特点分析[D];吉林大学;2017年

3 尚志杰;心脏破裂的外科救治分析[D];山西医科大学;2010年

4 席鹏丽;急性心肌梗死后发生心脏破裂的危险因素[D];天津医科大学;2014年

5 向阳;性别对小鼠急性心肌梗死后心脏破裂的影响及分子机制研究[D];新疆医科大学;2007年

6 刘莹;Hsp25基因缺失致小鼠心梗后心脏破裂的相关研究[D];南京师范大学;2013年

7 涂飞;小鼠心肌Hsp25基因缺失致心肌梗死后心脏破裂的机制研究[D];南京师范大学;2014年

8 陈少华;冠心病急性心肌梗死患者住院期间转归及影响因素分析[D];华中科技大学;2011年



本文编号:1960255

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/xxg/1960255.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户31fa2***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com