药品可负担性评价方法研究

发布时间：2018-05-20 05:25

本文选题：药品 + 可负担性　；参考：《中国药房》2015年28期

【摘要】：目的:研究药品可负担性评价方法,为我国药品可负担性的科学评价提供理论支持。方法:通过介绍可负担性的概念、评价方法,对药品可负担性评价方法中"灾难性药品支出"和"致贫作用"评价方法的具体操作步骤进行系统阐述。结果与结论:灾难性药品支出和致贫作用两种评价方法均可用于衡量药品可负担性,但均存在一定的局限性。灾难性药品支出评价方法的主要局限性在于无法衡量灾难性支出给家庭带来的后果、忽视疾病发生后家庭收入的降低;而致贫作用评价方法的主要局限性在于未能充分关注药品支出前就处于贫困线以下的人群。两种评价方法互为补充,可更加客观真实地反映患者对药品费用的承受能力,为完善国家药品定价和报销制度等政策提供科学参考。
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the evaluation method of drug affordability and provide theoretical support for the scientific evaluation of drug affordability in China. Methods: by introducing the concept of affordability and evaluating method, the concrete operation steps of "catastrophic drug expenditure" and "poor effect" in the evaluation method of drug affordability were systematically expounded. Results & conclusion: the two evaluation methods of catastrophic drug expenditure and poor effect can be used to measure the affordability of drugs, but both of them have some limitations. The main limitation of the evaluation method of catastrophic drug expenditure lies in the inability to measure the consequences of catastrophic expenditure on families and the neglect of the decline of household income after the occurrence of diseases. The main limitation of the method is that it does not pay enough attention to the people who are below the poverty line before the drug expenditure. The two evaluation methods complement each other, which can reflect the patient's ability to bear the drug cost more objectively and truthfully, and provide scientific reference for perfecting the national drug pricing and reimbursement system.
【作者单位】：北京大学药学院;北京大学医药管理国际研究中心;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.71303011)
【分类号】：R95

【参考文献】