关于“大同小康”之论错简问题的探讨——从宋代以降学者的相关质疑说起

发布时间：2018-02-24 09:40

本文关键词： 《礼运》 “大同小康” 错简王夫之 “以注为经”　出处：《孔子研究》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在宋元明诸多学者对"大同小康"之论提出各种质疑的背景下,清初王夫之明确指出"大同小康"之论存在错简。其后,清代学者任启运、姜兆锡、李绂、孙希旦、黄式三、邵懿辰等,现当代学者钱基博、任铭善、徐仁甫等,围绕错简问题亦各有阐发,只是缘于视角的不同,提出的见解彼此不尽一致。不过,将各位学者的"纠错"主张代入"大同小康"之论文本之后,不难发现,问题并不能有效解决,更常见的是"按下葫芦起来瓢"。这说明,"大同小康"之论"其言杂乱,……其文不次"的问题固然是客观存在的,但归咎于错简却不恰当。事实上,在"其言杂乱,……其文不次"的表象背后,"以注为经"当是症结之所在,只要把注释与原文区别开来,"大同小康"之论逻辑不通、文气不顺的问题也便不复存在了。
[Abstract]:Against the background that many scholars in Song, Yuan and Ming put forward various doubts about the theory of "Datong Xiaokang", Wang Fuzhi clearly pointed out in the early Qing Dynasty that there were mistakes in the theory of "Datong Xiaokang". Afterwards, scholars Ren Qiyun, Jiang Zhaoxi, Li Fu, Sun Xidan, and Huang Shi-san in the Qing Dynasty clearly pointed out that there were mistakes in the theory of "Datong Xiaokang". Shao Yichen and so on, modern and contemporary scholars Qian Jibo, Ren Mingshan, Xu Renfu, and so on, have their own explanations around the problem of simple mistakes, but because of the different perspectives, the opinions put forward are not consistent with each other. It is not difficult to find that the problem can not be solved effectively by inserting the "error-correcting" proposition of the scholars into the text of "Datong Xiaokang". It is more common to "press the gourd to get up a ladle." this shows that the theory of "a well-off society in great harmony" is an objective problem, but it is not appropriate to blame it on the wrong simplicity. Behind the appearance of "his speech is confused and his words are not secondary," the crux of the matter is "taking note as the Sutra". As long as the commentary is distinguished from the original, the logic of the theory of "Datong Xiaokang" does not work, and the problem of literary malaise will no longer exist.
【作者单位】：中共山东省委党校校刊部;中共山东省委党校山东省伦理学与精神文明建设研究基地;
【分类号】：B21

【相似文献】