初中英语经验型教师与新手型教师课堂提问个案研究
[Abstract]:In the classroom discourse of teachers, questions account for a considerable proportion, which is regarded as the core of effective teaching. However, at present, teachers' classroom questioning is mainly focused on college English classes, and junior middle school English classroom questions are relatively few. Based on Klaassen's comprehensible input theory in second language acquisition, Michael Lang's interaction hypothesis and Swan's output hypothesis, this paper selects an empirical English teacher and a novice English teacher from a middle school in Guilin. This paper makes a comparative analysis on the types, strategies, waiting time and feedback methods of classroom questions, in order to understand the general situation of their questions, and finally puts forward some corresponding suggestions according to the problems that exist in their questions. It is hoped that it will be helpful for novice teachers to improve their questioning skills and promote their professional development. Through classroom observation and interview, this paper tries to answer the following research questions: (1) what are the similarities and differences between experiential teachers and novice teachers in classroom questioning? (2) what problems do they have respectively? Why? Based on the analysis of classroom observation and interview materials, the following conclusions are drawn: there are no significant differences in the types of questions, question strategies and feedback methods between experiential teachers and novice teachers, and there are great differences in waiting time. The specific points are: (1) experiential teachers and novice teachers have similar types of questions, which are more demonstrative than referential, mainly because they emphasize the explanation of language knowledge in the classroom. The classroom is teacher-centered and related to the students' level. (2) in the aspect of questioning strategies, the most frequently used strategies are prompts and repetition strategies, followed by questioning strategies, or at least turning to question strategies. They can use hint and repetition strategy very well, but they are not familiar with the question and turn strategy, which indicates that teachers lack the corresponding theory of question strategy; (3) waiting time, The average waiting time of experiential teachers is longer than that of novice teachers. Experiential teachers have rich teaching experience to grasp the allocation of time and the difficulty of problems, while novice teachers have less experience. (4) in the aspect of feedback mode, both of them prefer positive feedback mode, but negative feedback is less. They both think that positive feedback helps students to participate actively in class and increase students' self-confidence. Finally, the author puts forward some suggestions: (1) the teacher should change the teaching concept, the classroom should be student-centered, and the teacher should pay more attention to the meaning and communication of the language, not only the form and accuracy of the language; (2) Teachers should strengthen their learning of theoretical knowledge of questioning strategies, and use all kinds of questioning strategies flexibly in class. (3) when students answer questions, teachers should be patient, in addition, novice teachers should learn from experiential teachers. That is to say, the novice teachers should grasp the difficulty in advance and allocate the time well; (4) when giving feedback, teachers should be timely and accurate. Hope these suggestions can give teachers some reference value and promote their professional development.
【学位授予单位】:广西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:G633.41
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 卢正芝;洪松舟;;教师课堂提问有效性提升的实践研究[J];上海教育科研;2010年11期
2 杨雪燕;解敏;;外语教师课堂提问的互动性分析[J];当代外语研究;2012年03期
3 徐勰;;外语教师课堂提问分类研究述评[J];哈尔滨职业技术学院学报;2008年05期
4 胡青球,埃德·尼可森,陈炜;大学英语教师课堂提问模式调查分析[J];外语界;2004年06期
5 朱丹;;英语教师课堂提问策略刍议[J];经济研究导刊;2009年35期
6 张玉梅;;英语教师课堂提问的理论和实证研究文献综述[J];才智;2011年29期
7 于佳卉;;高职思政课教师课堂提问观察报告[J];科技信息;2013年05期
8 郭红梅;;高校英语教师课堂提问浅析[J];吉林省教育学院学报(下旬);2013年04期
9 王晓敏;;教改环境下大学英语教师课堂提问模式的调查与分析——以温州医学院为例[J];温州医学院学报;2013年06期
10 刘炜;;外语/二语语言教师课堂提问行为研究——国外相关研究述评[J];英语教师;2010年01期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 李芳;;语文教师课堂提问的技巧[A];中华教育理论与实践科研论文成果选编(第1卷)[C];2009年
2 吴桂珍;;精心设计提问 优化教学效果——浅析小学语文教师课堂提问存在的问题及对策[A];中华教育理论与实践科研论文成果选编(第3卷)[C];2010年
3 王俊敏;;通过学生反馈来评价小学教师课堂提问质量的途径和方法的研究报告[A];基础教育质量监控专题研讨会论文集[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前8条
1 河南汝州市纸坊乡一中 董跃梓;数学教师课堂提问的艺术性[N];学知报;2011年
2 傅海洋 侯占存;“满堂灌”缘何成了“满堂问”?[N];文汇报;2008年
3 山东省淄博市张店区第七中学 魏俊峰;浅谈学生问题意识培养与自主课堂构建[N];学知报;2011年
4 兴平市初级中学 陈西进 刘超库;在有效教学中有效提问[N];咸阳日报;2010年
5 甘谷县第三中学 杨继福;浅议探究性提问的特点[N];甘肃日报;2011年
6 江苏省滨海县东坎镇实验小学 张丁香;课堂提问应设计富有挑战性[N];学知报;2011年
7 浙江省乐清市乐成镇三中 吴晓婵;课堂的起点[N];学知报;2011年
8 江苏省宝应县城北初级中学 汤云翔;设计合理的课堂提问 让课堂更精彩[N];学知报;2010年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 韩琴;课堂互动对学生创造性问题提出能力的影响[D];华中师范大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 曹欢;小学数学教师课堂提问技能的现状及对策研究[D];渤海大学;2015年
2 金海燕;高中英语阅读课教师课堂提问现状调g岸圆哐芯縖D];延边大学;2015年
3 曾菁云;梅里尔教育目标分类学下的小学数学教师课堂提问研究[D];闽南师范大学;2015年
4 杨阳;初中数学教师课堂提问技巧的研究[D];四川师范大学;2015年
5 杨春猛;基于三维教学目标下高中数学课堂提问用语现状的调查研究[D];云南师范大学;2015年
6 张小雪;初中英语教师课堂提问与学困生课堂参与度的关系[D];福建师范大学;2015年
7 和亚琪;高中英语教师课堂提问对学生学习情感影响的调查研究[D];内蒙古师范大学;2015年
8 郑佳;小学数学教师课堂提问有效性研究[D];杭州师范大学;2015年
9 陈思思;初中数学新老教师概念课提问行为比较研究[D];杭州师范大学;2015年
10 游娜;高中物理概念教学中教师课堂提问行为研究[D];南京师范大学;2015年
,本文编号:2267199
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/2267199.html