大陆地区“语文”全国卷与台湾地区“国文”指考卷比较研究
[Abstract]:The main purpose of this study is to improve the communication and communication between the two sides of the university entrance examination, and to promote the perfection and improvement of the cross-straits college entrance examination language examination questions. Through comparative analysis and literature review, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the Chinese examination questions in the cross-Strait college entrance examination, and makes a questionnaire survey. The interview method finds out the problems in the practical application of the mainland Chinese papers and puts forward some reasonable suggestions for the improvement of the Chinese examination questions in the whole country on the basis of finding the problems and comparing them with the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. The introduction of this paper briefly introduces the research object, research content, research ideas and methods, the current research status, the value and significance of the research. The main body of this paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter is a comparative study on the overall form of the examination questions in the past five years, including the comparison of the examination time limit and the quantity of the questions, the comparison of the types and structure of the questions and the comparison of the answering standards. The second chapter is a comparison of the contents of the cross-Strait examination questions, which are compared in terms of the reading questions of modern literature, the reading questions of ancient poetry and prose, the use of language and characters, the selection of materials and the examination objectives of the papers. Discover the similarities and differences of cross-straits test questions in different types of examination. The third chapter is based on the comparative national paper practical application of the problem and its solution, this chapter is through the questionnaire survey of examinees and the interview results of Chinese teachers, found that the national paper in the practical use of the problems, In view of these problems and on the basis of the full-text analysis of cross-Strait test questions, this paper synthesizes the inspiration from Taiwan's index examination papers, and puts forward some reasonable suggestions for improving the national examination questions' order system. The innovation of this thesis is that, first of all, the research object is novel. There are few of the Chinese examination questions in mainland China and those in Taiwan as the comparative research objects. The second is the novelty of the contrast, especially the comparison of the contents of the cross-Strait test questions. Because the Taiwan test group is different from the national volume, it does not read according to modern literature and ancient poetry and prose as the national volume does. The use of language and characters has the characteristics of clear and independent questions, but there is no order and not according to a certain assessment goals or materials to organize the examination questions, this paper is based on the national volume, According to the national standards for examination questions and examination objectives, the paper classifies and arranges the test questions in order to find the propositional characteristics of cross-straits test questions in the examination of similar questions and Chinese ability. It is hoped that this comparison will give some inspiration and reflection to the improvement of the national examination questions. The research of this paper will help to promote the communication and exchange of the Chinese examination questions in the national college entrance examination and the improvement of the national test system. Since Shandong will use the new curriculum standard national paper I in 2018, the research of this paper has certain practical significance for Shandong senior high school Chinese teachers to understand the national paper, to study the national paper and to prepare for the national examination.
【学位授予单位】:鲁东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G633.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 ;全国卷[J];中学生阅读(高中版)(下半月);2013年09期
2 王刚;;关于2012年新课标全国卷某题新解[J];数理化学习(高中版);2014年02期
3 ;全国卷Ⅱ[J];数理天地(高中版);2006年09期
4 柳合青;;巧用“抄袭”艺术 解答历史材料题——以2007年全国卷Ⅰ历史试题为例[J];高考(政史地);2007年Z2期
5 ;全国卷Ⅰ[J];数理天地(高中版);2007年09期
6 常正良;徐少华;商中兰;王春明;吴浩;冯广华;贾文俊;魏小灰;郭玉海;程望兴;;到底什么是“竞争”?——理综全国卷(一)第2题分析[J];中学生物教学;2008年08期
7 ;2007年全国卷Ⅱ[J];同学少年;2008年01期
8 ;全国卷Ⅱ[J];数理天地(高中版);2008年09期
9 董家兴;;2008年普通高等学校招生全国统一考试 全国卷Ⅱ(理科数学)[J];上海中学数学;2008年Z1期
10 岳儒芳;邵明宪;陈罗英;朱红岩;;全国卷Ⅰ(理)第18题别解[J];中学数学月刊;2009年08期
相关重要报纸文章 前9条
1 ;2003年普通高等学校招生全国统一考试 (数学全国卷)[N];中国教育报;2003年
2 记者 冯瑜;改用全国卷影响有限[N];济南日报;2014年
3 陶洪光;上海向全国卷考生提供九套试卷[N];文汇报;2004年
4 华南师范大学 黄牧航 王思莹 (黄牧航系该校基础教育培训与研究院副院长);全国卷:关注社会热点 贴近时代生活[N];中国教育报;2014年
5 李雪林;透视今年上海高招方案[N];文汇报;2005年
6 本报记者 徐敏 本报通讯员 渠成;解说“3+×X”[N];解放日报;2001年
7 新疆实验中学特级教师 任金璧 中国人民大学附属中学特级教师 沈献章;语文(全国卷)变中凸现能力本位[N];中国教育报;2003年
8 王新伟;2002年高考(全国卷)语文试题语言基础知识题详解[N];中国教育资讯报;2002年
9 记者 陶洪光 通讯员 丁良;今年本市高考推出多项改革[N];文汇报;2001年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 王琳;新课标全国卷和台湾卷高考历史试题的比较研究(2010-2013年)[D];河南师范大学;2015年
2 白萧;近三年高考化学全国卷(Ⅰ、Ⅱ)与四川卷的对比研究与启示[D];四川师范大学;2016年
3 刘雪;2010-2016年新课标全国卷Ⅰ地理试题分析[D];鲁东大学;2017年
4 梁雪;大陆地区“语文”全国卷与台湾地区“国文”指考卷比较研究[D];鲁东大学;2017年
5 张新;新课标全国卷与全国卷I卷材料解析题之比较[D];陕西师范大学;2013年
6 张聪;多选题命题质量控制实证研究[D];湖南师范大学;2011年
7 陈丽萍;2010年至2013年新课标文综全国卷地理试题的分析[D];河南大学;2014年
,本文编号:2427922
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/2427922.html