完善我国公司司法解散制度的新探索

发布时间：2018-04-15 17:05

本文选题：司法解散 + 公司僵局　；参考：《华东政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：公司司法解散制度作为公司的一种退出机制,是解决公司僵局和公司压迫问题的有效途径,对保护公司的股东、债权人及利益相关人都有着非常重要的意义。但遗憾的是,这一重要制度在1993年的《公司法》中并没有提及,这一缺陷让不少中小股东身陷困境。2006年实施的新《公司法》引进了这一制度,为解决公司的僵局问题提供了法律依据,但由于该规定过于笼统而缺乏可操作性,不能满足日益增多的司法解散诉讼。后来的《公司法司法解释二》对此又进行了补充性规定。但是,与国外发达国家成熟的司法解散制度相比,我们处在起步阶段,很多问题有待理论界和实务界的摸索、完善。本文通过比较分析国外先进的制度设计和实践经验,找出我国司法解散制度在立法和实践中存在的缺陷,并对今后如何在立法中不断完善,进行初步的探索。本文分为五章,第一章:公司司法解散制度的基本理论,本章主要介绍了公司司法解散的概念及分类、司法解散制度的法理基础、司法解散制度本身的缺陷。该部分是全文的基础部分,为下文展开论述奠定了理论基石。第二章:司法解散制度存在的必要性,该章主要通过对公司僵局、公司压迫的介绍,阐明了建立司法解散制度的现实意义和存在的价值。第三章:我国公司司法解散制度的现状及缺陷,这一章主要介绍了我国司法解散制度的历史沿革,并通过比较分析的方法,指出了这一制度在程序法和实体法上两个方面的缺陷和不足。第四章:域外公司司法解散制度的历史渊源和研究成果,这章通过介绍英、美、德、日等国的司法解散制度,为完善我国的司法解散制度提供借鉴的模本。第五章:我国公司司法解散制度的探索和完善,这一章针对第三章所指出的我国的司法解散制度中存在的问题,提出若干种完善制度的意见和建议,由于司法解散制度的极大破坏性,使我们在适用这一制度时,应该持谨慎态度,尽量采用替代性救济措施,该部分就着重探讨了在现有的公司司法解散制度下,引进强制股权回购制度这种替代性救济措施的可行性。
[Abstract]:As an exit mechanism of the company, the judicial dissolution system is an effective way to solve the problems of corporate deadlock and corporate oppression. It is of great significance to protect the shareholders, creditors and stakeholders of the company.However, unfortunately, this important system was not mentioned in the Company Law of 1993, which caused many minority shareholders to get into trouble. The new Company Law implemented in 2006 introduced this system.It provides the legal basis for solving the deadlock problem of the company, but because this provision is too general and lack of maneuverability, it can not satisfy the increasing judicial dissolution litigation.Later, the Company Law Judicial interpretation II made supplementary provisions to this.However, compared with the mature judicial dissolution system in foreign developed countries, we are in the initial stage, and many problems need to be explored and perfected by the theoretical and practical circles.By comparing and analyzing the advanced institutional design and practical experience of foreign countries, this paper finds out the defects in the legislation and practice of the judicial dissolution system in our country, and makes a preliminary exploration on how to improve the system in the future.This paper is divided into five chapters: the first chapter: the basic theory of corporate judicial dissolution system, this chapter mainly introduces the concept and classification of judicial dissolution of companies, the legal basis of judicial dissolution system, and the defects of judicial dissolution system itself.This part is the basic part of the full text, which lays the theoretical foundation for the following discussion.The second chapter: the necessity of the judicial dissolution system. This chapter expounds the practical significance and the value of the judicial dissolution system through the introduction of corporate deadlock and corporate oppression.Chapter three: the present situation and defects of the judicial dissolution system of our country. This chapter mainly introduces the historical evolution of the judicial dissolution system of our country, and through the method of comparative analysis,The defects and deficiencies of this system in both procedural law and substantive law are pointed out.Chapter four: the historical origin and research results of the judicial dissolution system of foreign companies. This chapter introduces the judicial dissolution system of Britain, the United States, Germany and Japan, and provides a model for improving the judicial dissolution system of our country.Chapter five: the exploration and perfection of the judicial dissolution system of our country, this chapter puts forward some opinions and suggestions to perfect the system in view of the problems existing in the judicial dissolution system of our country pointed out in the third chapter.Due to the devastating nature of the judicial dissolution system, we should be cautious in applying this system and use alternative relief measures as far as possible. This part focuses on the existing corporate judicial dissolution system.Introduction of mandatory share buyback system this alternative relief measures feasibility.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】