论股东派生诉讼中公司的法律地位

发布时间：2018-06-06 19:27

本文选题：派生诉讼 + 辅助第三人　；参考：《湘潭大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：股东派生诉讼制度是保护公司股东合法利益的一项重要制度。虽然在不同的国家或地区对于这一制度的称谓有所不同，但是其实质上的涵义是相同的。股东派生诉讼是指实际控制公司的人员损害公司的合法利益时，符合条件的中小股东请求公司起诉，但是公司拒绝或怠于起诉时，特定股东代位公司提起股东派生诉讼以保障公司的合法权益。股东派生诉讼能使公司治理结构更加优化，使公司经营控制权得到强化。我国的股东派生诉讼制度是在2005年新修订的《公司法》中确立的。然而，《公司法》并没有对公司在股东派生诉讼中的法律地位作出具体的规定。仅仅只是对股东提起派生诉讼的条件、诉讼的前置程序以及被告的范围作了规定。因此，应该在相关的法律中明确规定公司在派生诉讼中的法律地位。本文结合股东派生诉讼制度的概念和特征，阐述了我国股东派生诉讼制度的理论和实践情况，并对国外股东派生诉讼立法例作了比较分析，论述了我国公司在股东派生诉讼中法律地位的立法选择。因此认为，公司应以辅助第三人的身份参加股东派生诉讼。笔者建议我国应尽快在股东派生诉讼制度中规定公司在股东派生诉讼中的法律地位，，即公司作为辅助第三人。这将更有效的保护公司及其中心股东的合法权益，并将使股东派生诉讼制度的功能得到充分的发挥。
[Abstract]:Shareholder derivative litigation system is an important system to protect the legitimate interests of shareholders. Although the appellation of this system is different in different countries or regions, its meaning is the same in essence. Shareholder derivative action refers to when the person who actually controls the company damages the legitimate interests of the company, the eligible minority shareholders request the company to sue, but when the company refuses or is unwilling to sue, A specific shareholder subrogation company brings a shareholder derivative action to protect the legal rights and interests of the company. The shareholder derivative litigation can make the corporate governance structure more optimized and the company management control rights strengthened. The shareholder derivative litigation system of our country was established in the newly revised Company Law in 2005. However, the Company Law does not make specific provisions on the legal status of the company in shareholder derivative litigation. Only the conditions for shareholders to bring derivative actions, the pre-procedure and the scope of the defendant. Therefore, the legal status of the company in the derivative action should be clearly stipulated in the relevant laws. This paper, based on the concept and characteristics of the shareholder derivative litigation system, expounds the theory and practice of the shareholder derivative action system in China. A comparative analysis is made on the legislative examples of shareholder derivative litigation in foreign countries, and the legislative choice of the legal status of Chinese companies in shareholder derivative litigation is discussed. Therefore, the company should participate in shareholder derivative litigation as auxiliary third party. The author suggests that our country should stipulate the legal status of the company in the shareholder derivative litigation system as soon as possible, that is, the company as the auxiliary third party. This will more effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of the company and its central shareholders, and will make the function of shareholder derivative litigation system fully play.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】