合作作品共有著作权行使规范解释适用与完善

发布时间：2018-03-09 00:04

本文选题：合作作品　切入点：共有著作权　出处：《法学杂志》2017年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国《著作权法实施条例》第9条所采用的合作作品共有著作权行使规范模式最有利于维护合作作者和社会公众之间的利益平衡。《著作权法实施条例》第9条的适用,在合作作者违法单独行使权利的对外效力、"不能协商一致"的内涵是否可作目的性扩张、如何具体化不确定概念"正当理由"、除转让以外的"其他权利"的界定、除外的是否仅限于"转让"等方面存在疑义,文章对其从法律解释学上进行了分析。《著作权法(修订草案送审稿)》第17条规定了合作作品共有著作权行使规范,其关于合作作者在合作作品共有著作权受侵害时得单独行使诉权的规定值得肯定应予保留,而其关于不可分割使用的合作作品共有著作权行使规范的规定,则应吸收前述法律解释成果作进一步完善,同时应规定该规范可类推适用于可分割使用的合作作品共有著作权的行使。
[Abstract]:Article 9 of the regulations on the implementation of the copyright Law of our country adopts a common mode of regulating the exercise of copyright, which is most conducive to maintaining the balance of interests between the co-authors and the public. The application of Article 9 of the regulations on the implementation of the copyright Law, Whether the connotation of "can't consensus" can be purposefully expanded in the external effect of the cooperative author's illegal exercise of his right alone, how to concretize the definition of "just cause" of the concept of uncertainty, and the definition of "other rights" other than transfer, and whether or not the connotation of "cannot be agreed upon" can be expanded purposefully. Whether the exception is limited to "transfer" or not is doubtful, and the article analyzes it from the angle of legal hermeneutics. Article 17 of the copyright Law (draft revised draft for trial) stipulates the norms for the exercise of the common copyright of a cooperative work. Its provisions on the individual exercise of the right of action by a co-author in the event of infringement of the co-author 's copyright in a cooperative work deserve to be preserved, while its provisions on the norms governing the exercise of the common copyright of a cooperative work that are inseparably used, It should absorb the above legal interpretation achievements to make further improvement, at the same time, it should be stipulated that the norm can be applied to the exercise of the common copyright of the cooperative works which can be divided and used by analogy.
【作者单位】：江南大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】