中国知识产权专门法院的建构

发布时间：2018-03-13 01:26

本文选题：知识产权专门法院　切入点：技术调查官　出处：《财经法学》2016年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：为加强知识产权保护,我国于2014年在北京、上海、广州三地建立知识产权专门法院。这既符合建设创新型国家的目标,又有助于提升中国在国际社会中的国家形象。知识产权法院的建立,开启了我国知识产权案件审理的新纪元。随着案件审理工作的开展,知识产权法院逐渐暴露出一些问题。本文首先以德国、美国、日本和我国台湾地区为参照,分析归纳我国知识产权法院在建制上与其他国家或地区的相同点与不同点。之后根据最新相关信息,总结我国知识产权法院在运行中存在的问题。问题主要有三方面:法官面临超负荷的工作量;缺少专门化的上诉法院;刑事案件未纳入审理范围。最后,文章就上述问题,提出改进建议。在人员配置上,应该适度扩充知识产权法官的数量,增强技术人员的参与程度;在审判模式上,将刑事案件纳入审理范围内,构建三审合一制度;在法院布局上,基于案件专业性的要求,应尽快建立知识产权上诉法院及巡回法庭。
[Abstract]:In 2014, in order to strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights, China established specialized courts for intellectual property rights in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. This is in line with the goal of building an innovative country. It will also help to enhance China's national image in the international community. The establishment of the intellectual property Court has opened a new era in the trial of intellectual property cases in China. With the development of the trial of cases, The intellectual property courts have gradually exposed some problems. First of all, this paper refers to Germany, the United States, Japan and Taiwan. This paper analyzes and summarizes the similarities and differences between China's intellectual property courts and other countries or regions in terms of organizational system. Then, according to the latest relevant information, This paper summarizes the problems existing in the operation of intellectual property courts in China. There are three main problems: the judges are faced with overloaded workload; there is a lack of specialized appeal courts; criminal cases are not included in the scope of trial. In terms of staffing, the number of intellectual property judges should be appropriately expanded, and the participation of technical personnel should be enhanced. In the trial mode, criminal cases should be brought into the scope of trial, and the system of integration of three trials should be constructed. In court layout, intellectual property appeal court and circuit court should be established as soon as possible.
【作者单位】：中央财经大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“网络交易平台提供者商标侵权问题研究”(项目编号:14BFX105)
【分类号】：D926.2;D923.4

【相似文献】