论越权代表行为的效力——兼评《合同法》第50条

发布时间：2018-03-14 01:29

  本文选题：越权代表　切入点：表见代表　出处：《学术论坛》2015年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：《合同法》对法定代表人的越权代表行为效力的认定过于简单。为了正确认定越权代表行为的效力,首先需要界定能对法定代表人权利施加限制的范围,然后类推适用无权代理制度分析,按照表见制度与狭义无权制度的类型化来处理越权代表行为的效力。对越权代表行为效力不被追认时的责任分担,应当由越权行为人与恶意第三人在各自的过错范围内承担责任。
[Abstract]:In order to correctly identify the validity of the ultra vires representative act, it is necessary to define the scope within which the legal representative's rights can be restricted. Then it applies the analysis of unauthorized agent system by analogy, and deals with the effectiveness of ultra vires representative act according to the classification of apparent system and narrow sense right system, and shares the responsibility when the validity of ultra vires representative act is not ratified. The perpetrator and the malicious third party shall bear the responsibility within the limits of their respective fault.
【作者单位】： 广西警官高等专科学校;
【分类号】：D923
，

本文编号：1609004