中国媒体名誉侵权司法裁判的实证分析

发布时间：2018-03-14 02:26

本文选题：名誉侵权　切入点：媒体诉讼　出处：《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》2015年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：以1998至2010年间215份媒体名誉侵权司法裁判文书为样本,本研究分析了我国法院对涉及媒体表达自由与名誉权保护关系案件的裁决方式。数据显示,有超过50%的概率,法院会判决媒体被告败诉。比之于经济与社会资源较多的法人原告或政府官员原告,法院更可能支持普通人原告,但会给文化名人更多的名誉保护。数据还显示,当起诉事由涉及公共事务时,法院对于媒体更加宽容;当媒体侵权行为有明显商业动机时,法院对媒体的处置更为严厉。此外,法院对本地媒体被告也更为宽容,在起诉事由涉及公众事务时尤其如此。法院对外地媒体相对严厉,当起诉事由涉及非公共事务的案件,外地媒体被告几乎毫无胜算。依据这些发现,本文还评价了过往相关研究,并指出了本研究的局限。
[Abstract]:Based on 215 judicial and judicial documents on media reputation infringement between 1998 and 2010, this study analyzes the way the courts in our country adjudicate cases involving the relationship between the freedom of expression and the protection of the right to reputation. The data show that there are more than 50% probabilities. The court will rule against a media defendant. The court is more likely to support ordinary plaintiffs than to legal person plaintiffs or government officials with more economic and social resources, but it will give cultural celebrities more protection of their reputation. The data also show that. The court is more tolerant of the media when the cause of prosecution involves public affairs; when the media infringement has a clear commercial motive, the court deals with the media more harshly. In addition, the court is more tolerant of local media defendants. This is especially true when the subject matter of prosecution involves public affairs. The court is relatively strict with the foreign media, and when prosecution matters involve cases involving non-public affairs, the defendants in the foreign media have little chance of winning. Based on these findings, This paper also evaluates the previous studies and points out the limitations of this study.
【作者单位】：上海交通大学人文艺术研究院;上海交通大学社会认知与行为科学研究院;上海交通大学凯原法学院;上海交通大学媒体与设计学院;
【基金】：上海教委创新重点项目“中国媒体表达自由的司法空间与约束”(项目编号:11ZS24) 上海交通大学文理交叉项目“信息处理与公正判断”(项目编号:11JCY09)的研究成果
【分类号】：D923;G219.2

【参考文献】