建设工程合同无效法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-26 01:03

本文选题：建设工程合同　切入点：合同无效　出处：《辽宁大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国是建筑业大国,作为国民经济基础产业,建筑业的地位举足轻重。伴随建筑行业的蓬勃发展,建设工程领域的相关法律问题也随之不断增多。同时,由于建设工程具有资金投入大、施工周期长、专业技术复杂、涉及内容广等特点,我国针对建设工程合同的订立程序、合同当事人的资格审查、合同实际履行以及纠纷化解机制等多方面进行统一协调。不但完善了相关立法,并进一步进行了不同执法层面的严格执法、建筑市场秩序的规范。虽然如此,但现在的司法实际情况是,受制于我国现今的经济发展情况及法律体系、立法现状的不完善,一个建设工程项目,从立项审批、招投标程序、正式合同的签订、合同的备案、合同实际履行、竣工验收等环节,频繁出现违法违规行为。如恶性竞标、订立黑白合同、不具备资质的施工人违法承包、非法转包、违法分包等。正因为这些乱现象的出现,才导致建设工程合同的效力面临多种问题亟待解决。对目前比较常见的建设工程合同,现行的法律法规及司法解释对此均有明确的规定。但因我国建筑市场上违法行为众多,已存在的法律法规及司法解释远远不能满足司法实务的需要。同时,在某些情况下,认定建设工程合同无效在理论界也存在争议,使得审判人员在处理涉及建设工程合同无效及后果的相关案件中,遇到很多障碍。本文通过两个案例的引入,以建设工程合同无效的焦点作为切入点,探究建设工程合同无效的主要情形、特殊的合同无效情况(如黑白合同)以及无效后的法律后果。笔者查阅了与建设工程合同相关的,譬如《建筑法》《招标投标法》等法律法规,在整理、分析、汇总已查阅资料的基础上,对前述问题进行了深入的探析及反思。作为一名在法院工作的司法工作人员,笔者写作本文目的是希望对有关建设工程合同无效的类型案件阐述理论和实践的建议,以期对司法审判实务作出贡献。
[Abstract]:China is a large country of construction industry, as the basic industry of national economy, the position of construction industry is very important. With the vigorous development of construction industry, the related legal problems in the field of construction engineering are also increasing. At the same time, Because the construction project has the characteristics of large capital investment, long construction period, complex professional technology, wide content, etc., the conclusion procedure of the construction project contract and the qualification examination of the parties to the contract in our country, The actual performance of the contract and the dispute resolution mechanism have been unified and coordinated. Not only has the relevant legislation been perfected, but also the strict enforcement of the law at different levels of law enforcement and the norms of the order of the construction market have been carried out. Nevertheless, However, the actual situation of the current judicial system is that it is subject to the current economic development and legal system of our country, the imperfection of the current legislative situation, a construction project, examination and approval of a construction project, bidding procedures, the signing of a formal contract, and the filing of a contract. The actual performance of the contract, the completion and acceptance of the contract, and other links have frequently resulted in illegal and illegal activities, such as vicious bidding, conclusion of black-and-white contracts, illegal contracting, illegal subcontracting, illegal subcontracting by unqualified constructors, and so on. Precisely because of the emergence of these chaotic phenomena, As a result, the effectiveness of the construction contract faces many problems to be solved urgently. The current laws and regulations and judicial interpretations have clear provisions on the construction contracts, which are relatively common at present. However, there are many illegal acts in the construction market of our country. The existing laws and regulations and the judicial interpretation are far from meeting the needs of judicial practice. At the same time, in some cases, it is also disputed in the theoretical circle that the construction project contract is invalid. This makes the judges encounter many obstacles in dealing with the related cases involving the invalidity and consequences of the construction project contract. Through the introduction of two cases, this paper takes the focus of the construction project contract invalidation as the starting point. This paper probes into the main circumstances of the invalidity of the construction project contract, the special circumstances of the invalidation of the contract (such as black-and-white contract) and the legal consequences after the invalidation. For example, on the basis of sorting out, analyzing and summarizing the information already consulted, and other laws and regulations, such as the "Building Law" and the "bidding and bidding Law", the above problems have been deeply explored and reconsidered. As a judicial staff member working in the court, The purpose of this paper is to expound the theoretical and practical suggestions on the types of cases concerning the invalidation of construction contracts in order to make a contribution to the judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.6

【参考文献】