违约方合同解除权探究

发布时间：2018-04-05 10:20

本文选题：违约方　切入点：合同解除权　出处：《广西师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：在排除约定、协定、不可抗力及情势变更解除合同的情形下,目前立法、司法及学界通说都认为违约方不享有合同解除权,但现在这一观点已经越来越不能满足社会的需要了,“新宇公司诉冯玉梅商铺买卖合同纠纷案”中,法院判决支持违约方主张合同解除的诉求,实质上是赋予了违约方合同解除权,这与传统理论是背离的,但它却真正解决合同双方的纠纷,在节约社会资源、实现效率等方面发挥了作用,这引起笔者的思考,违约方到底有没有合同解除权?现在理论界对于违约方合同解除权的问题研究不多。这正是笔者写此篇论文的初衷。基于现行法,违约方可以不实际履行却不能行使法定的合同解除权,从而使交易陷入僵局,这样会造成社会资源的严重浪费。对此,笔者认为,违约方可以在特定的情形下享有合同解除权。论文主要分为以下几个部分:论文第一部分主要论述违约方合同解除权的立法及司法现状,用司法案例引出违约方合同解除权这一问题,说明对该问题的探究是有法律理论和实践价值的。论文第二部分主要论述域外法视野下的违约方合同解除权的问题,该部分主要以效率违约理论为基础展开对域外法下的违约方合同解除权问题的探讨。论文第三部分主要论述违约方合同解除权的性质及范围的界定。由于违约方合同解除权具有其特殊性,因此对其性质及范围的界定显得非常重要。论文第四部分主要论述违约方合同解除权的必要性及正当性。该部分从违约方行使合同解除权可以弥补实际履行制度缺陷、实现社会经济效率提高及平衡合同双方当事人利益这三方面来论证特定语境下设立该权利的必要性。从法律的诚实信用原则、效率价值、实质公平正义价值以及效率违约理论来论述其正当性。论文第五部分论述违约方合同解除权的制度设想。该部分主要论述违约方合同解除权与现行法律制度的衔接、违约方合同解除权适用的限制性条件、适用程序及法律后果。最后的结论部分是笔者通过上述几个部分的分析和论证后得出,违约方可以有条件地享有合同解除权。笔者希望这一制度可以在我国法律制度和实践上得到验证和运用。这样可以发挥其在减少损失、节约社会成本、优化配置社会资源、真正解决双方纠纷、维护社会经济秩序稳定等方面发挥作用。
[Abstract]:Under the circumstances of excluding agreements, agreements, force majeure and circumstance modification, the current legislation, judicial and academic circles all believe that the breaching party does not enjoy the right to rescind the contract, but now this view has become increasingly unable to meet the needs of society.In the case of Xinyu Company v. the dispute over the contract of Sale and purchase of Feng Yumei Shop, the court decided to support the breaching party's claim for the termination of the contract, which in essence gave the breaching party the right to terminate the contract, which is contrary to the traditional theory.However, it really solves the disputes between the two parties of the contract and plays an important role in saving social resources and realizing efficiency, which causes the author to think, does the breaching party have the right to terminate the contract?There is not much research on the right to rescind the contract of the defaulting party in the theoretical circle.This is the original intention of the author to write this paper.Based on the current law, the breaching party can not actually perform but can not exercise the legal right of rescission of the contract, thus leading to the deadlock of the transaction, which will cause a serious waste of social resources.Therefore, the author believes that the breaching party can enjoy the right of rescission of the contract under certain circumstances.The thesis is divided into the following parts: the first part of the paper mainly discusses the legislative and judicial status of the breaching party's right to rescind the contract, and leads to the issue of the party's right to rescind the contract with judicial cases.It shows that the exploration of this problem has the value of legal theory and practice.The second part of the thesis mainly discusses the issue of the right to rescind the contract of the breaching party under the perspective of extraterritorial law, which is mainly based on the theory of efficiency breach of contract, and discusses the issue of the right of rescission of the contract of the party in breach of contract under the extraterritorial law.The third part mainly discusses the definition of the nature and scope of the right of rescission of the contract of the breaching party.Because the breaching party's right of rescission has its particularity, it is very important to define its nature and scope.The fourth part mainly discusses the necessity and legitimacy of breaching party's right to rescind contract.This part demonstrates the necessity of establishing this right in the specific context from three aspects: the breaching party exercising the right of rescission of the contract can make up for the defects of the actual performance system, realize the improvement of social and economic efficiency and balance the interests of both parties to the contract.This paper discusses its legitimacy from the principle of good faith, efficiency value, substantial fairness and justice value and the theory of efficiency breach of contract.The fifth part of the thesis discusses the system assumption of the breaching party's right to rescind the contract.This part mainly discusses the connection between the breaching party's right to rescind the contract and the current legal system, the restrictive conditions, the applicable procedure and the legal consequences of the application of the breaching party's right to rescind the contract.The last part of the conclusion is that the breaching party can enjoy the right of rescission conditional by the analysis and argumentation of the above several parts.The author hopes that this system can be verified and applied in our country's legal system and practice.In this way, it can play a role in reducing losses, saving social costs, optimizing the allocation of social resources, resolving disputes between the two sides, and maintaining social and economic order and stability.
【学位授予单位】：广西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】