论民法典编纂中知识产权不宜独立成编

发布时间：2018-04-21 11:34

本文选题：知识产权 + 民法典编纂　；参考：《陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年02期

【摘要】：民法典总则民事权利体系虽应对知识产权作出规定,以彰显知识产权的重要性,纯正其私权属性,但民法典分则中不宜设置独立的知识产权法编,知识产权法应当保持现行民事单行特别法的立法模式。主要理由是:世界上从未有过成功范例;知识产权的变动性和民法典的稳定性不协调;知识产权立法中的大量公法性、程序性规范和民法典的私法属性相矛盾;知识产权法独立成编不能增加知识产权法的规范能量;难以将知识产权法中私法性、实体性规范和公法性规范、程序性规范截然分割,单独规定在民法典中。在民法典之外制定独立的知识产权法典也不可取,主要理由是:专利法、商标法、著作权法等知识产权法之间性质迥异,难以抽象出适用于所有知识产权法的一般规则;世界上没有成功的先例,《法国知识产权法典》只不过是一部所有知识产权法规范的汇编。
[Abstract]:Although the civil rights system of general civil code should stipulate the intellectual property right in order to highlight the importance of intellectual property and pure its private property, the independent intellectual property law should not be set up in the code of civil code, and the intellectual property law should keep the current legislative model of the special law of the civil single line. The main reason is that there has never been a success in the world. Examples; the changes in intellectual property rights and the stability of the civil code; a large number of public law in intellectual property legislation, procedural norms and private law properties of civil code; the independent compiling of intellectual property law can not increase the normative energy of intellectual property law; it is difficult to standardize the private law, substantive norms and public law in the law of intellectual property rights. The procedural norms are cut apart and separate in civil code. It is not advisable to establish an independent intellectual property code outside the civil code. The main reason is: the patent law, the trademark law, the copyright law and other intellectual property laws are very different in nature, and it is difficult to abstract the general rules applicable to all intellectual property law; there is no successful precedent in the world, < The code of intellectual property rights of France is nothing more than a compilation of all intellectual property laws.

【作者单位】：中山大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】