作品“实质性相似”的判断与认定——从“琼瑶诉于正”谈起

发布时间：2018-04-25 07:20

  本文选题：著作权 + 侵权判定　； 参考：《中国出版》2017年21期

【摘要】：对于著作权侵权认定,司法实践中常采用"接触"加"实质性相似"来加以判断。实质性相似判断首先涉及了思想表达二分法的前提性判断,其次关系到综合运用实质性相似的判定方法。然而,对于作品实质性相似的判断实际操作起来却异常困难。文章从"琼瑶诉于正"一案谈起,着重分析如何区分作品的思想与表达,通过对比不同的实质性相似判断方法,分析使用的数量或比例不影响实质性相似的认定,并提出对实质性相似判断加以完善的建议。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, "contact" and "substantial similarity" are often used to judge copyright infringement. The judgment of substantial similarity involves, first, the leading judgment of the dichotomy of thought expression, and secondly, the comprehensive application of the judgment method of substantive similarity. However, the judgment of substantial similarity of works is extremely difficult to operate in practice. The article begins with the case of Qiong Yao v. Zheng, focusing on how to distinguish the thought and expression of the works. By comparing different methods of judging substantial similarity, the paper analyzes that the quantity or proportion used does not affect the determination of substantive similarity. And put forward to the substantial similar judgment to perfect the suggestion.
【作者单位】： 浙江工商大学法学院;浙江工商大学知识产权学院;
【基金】：浙江省高校人文社科重点研究基地——浙江工商大学法学基地课题(2015A004)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923.41
，

本文编号：1800341