论自由裁量权在侵权按份责任中的适用

发布时间：2018-05-03 23:13

本文选题：侵权责任 + 按份责任　；参考：《烟台大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,在侵权法领域,由于连带责任的特殊性,学者们在宏观与微观上对其作了细致研究,并取得较好成果,而对侵权按份责任的研究较少。对于侵权按份责任的来说,法律条文对其规定大多采用“相应的”这一立法技术,但也不排除采用与减责条款结合规定的情形。以损害的不可分性为逻辑起点,具有过错的可分性、因果关系的整体性的侵权按份责任,《侵权责任法》对其责任的分担只是作了抽象性地规定,这为自由裁量权的适用开辟了空间。对于裁量权在侵权按份责任中的适用,责任分担论提供了必要条件,原因力理论为其适用提供了可行性,而程序正义的缺陷又使得自由裁量权的适用具有必然性。具体而言,法官在裁量时的主要根据来源于法律的规定,在理论上可将裁量因素归结于注意义务。除此之外,搭乘便车、第三人的介入行为等因素也不容忽视。
[Abstract]:In recent years, in the field of tort law, due to the particularity of joint and several liability, scholars have made a detailed study on it in macro and micro, and achieved better results, but less on the tort liability. For tort liability, most of the provisions of the law adopt the "corresponding" this legislative technology, but also does not rule out the use of provisions combined with the provisions of liability abatement. Taking the nonseparability of damage as the logical starting point, the tort liability with fault separability and causality as a whole is only stipulated in the Tort liability Law. This opens up space for the application of discretion. As to the application of discretion in tort liability, the theory of liability sharing provides the necessary conditions, the theory of cause force provides the feasibility for its application, and the defect of procedural justice makes the application of discretion inevitable. Specifically, the judge's discretion comes mainly from the law, which can be attributed to the duty of care in theory. In addition, ride hitchhiking, third person's intervention behavior and other factors can not be ignored.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】