论戏仿作品的著作权法保护
发布时间:2018-05-08 15:07
本文选题:戏仿作品 + 著作权法 ; 参考:《北京交通大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:从2006年胡戈创作的《一个馒头引发的血案》到如今的《西游降魔篇》、《舌尖上的宿舍》等,这些戏仿作品的出现不仅成为了国民关注的焦点,也引起了学术各界相关人士的广泛关注。戏仿作品是指在文学艺术领域内通过模仿、借用被戏仿作品的内容,以达到对被戏仿作品进行讽刺、调侃、娱乐或评论的目的,体现戏仿者独创性的作品。它包括文学作品、影视作品、音像制品等,形式多样,创作和表达的方式也呈多样化。戏仿作品的评论性和戏谑性虽然给我国现行的著作权法带来了挑战,但戏仿作品的著作权法保护有其理论基础,对戏仿作品的保护既是对民众表达言论和观点之权利的保护,也体现了著作权法维护著作权人利益和戏仿者利益之平衡的原则。可是我国著作权法并未界定戏仿作品的内涵,没有明确戏仿作品的著作权归属,对合理使用的规定也尚未完善。而西方国家对戏仿作品之法律问题的研究比较深入,已经做出了较为完善的处理规范。本文试图在现行的著作权法框架下,结合国外的相关法律经验,对戏仿作品的著作权法保护提出一些法律建议。 本文主要包括五个部分。第一部分对戏仿作品进行概述。通过阐述戏仿作品的由来、概念、条件以及和相关概念之比较,对戏仿作品加以界定。随后根据戏仿作品的分类,阐明本文主要研究的戏仿作品类型。之后分析戏仿作品的法律特征,为戏仿作品的著作权法保护做铺垫;第二部分阐述了戏仿作品著作权法保护的理论基础。分析戏仿作品受到著作权法保护与言论自由、文艺创作自由、鼓励作品创作与传播、利益平衡之间的一致性,表明了戏仿作品得到著作权法保护的合法性;第三部分评析国外著作权法对戏仿作品的保护模式,从中得出完善我国戏仿作品著作权法保护的启示;第四部分分析我国著作权法对戏仿作品的保护存在的问题。即未明确规定戏仿作品及其著作权归属,难以援引现行的合理使用制度。第五部分根据以上分析提出完善我国戏仿作品著作权法保护的建议:确立戏仿作品著作权法保护应遵循的原则,将戏仿作品列为著作权法的保护对象,明确戏仿作品的著作权归属,明确界定戏仿作品构成合理使用的条件。
[Abstract]:The appearance of "a steamed bun caused by a steamed bun" by Hu Ge in 2006, to the present "the West tour demons >", "the dorm on the tip of the tongue", has not only become the focus of the national attention, but also caused extensive attention of the relevant people from all walks of life. The parody refers to the imitation of the play in the field of art and art. In order to achieve the purpose of satirize, ridicule, entertain, or comment on the parody, it embodies the original work of the parody. It includes literary works, film and television, audio-visual products and so on. It is diversified in form, and in the way of creation and expression. The commentary and banter of parody works give the current copyright law of China There is a challenge, but the copyright law protection of the parody has its theoretical basis. The protection of the parody works is not only the protection of the rights of the people to express their opinions and opinions, but also the principle that the copyright law protects the interests of the copyright owners and the interests of the parody. However, the copyright law of our country does not define the connotations of the parody works. The ascription of copyrights of imimic works and the provision of reasonable use have not been perfected. While the western countries have made a more thorough study of the legal issues of parody works and have made a more perfect processing standard. This article tries to protect the copyrights law of parody works under the current copyright law framework and the legal experience of foreign countries. Give some legal advice.
This article mainly includes five parts. The first part is an overview of parody works. Through the explanation of the origin, concept, conditions and related concepts of parody, the parody works are defined. Then, according to the classification of the parody works, the types of imitation of the play are clarified. Then the legal characteristics of the parody works are analyzed. To pave the way for the copyright law protection of the parody works, the second part expounds the theoretical basis for the protection of the copyright law of the parody works, analyzes the freedom of copyright law protection and speech, the freedom of literary creation, the creation and dissemination of the works, and the consistency of the balance of interests, which shows that the parody works are protected by the copyright law. The third part reviews the protection mode of the foreign copyright law to the parody works, and draws the inspiration to improve the protection of the copyright law of the parody in our country; the fourth part analyses the problems in the protection of the parody works in our country's copyright law. The fifth part, according to the above analysis, proposes to improve the protection of the copyright law of Chinese parody works: to establish the principles to be followed in the protection of the copyright law of the parody works, to list the parody works as the protection object of the copyright law, to clarify the ownership of the copyrights of the parody works, and to define the conditions for the rational use of the parody works.
【学位授予单位】:北京交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.41
【引证文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 李晓森;;英国著作权戏仿例外制度对我国修法的启示[J];法制博览;2016年10期
,本文编号:1861886
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1861886.html