继续性合同的解除制度研究

发布时间：2018-05-08 19:45

本文选题：继续性合同 + 信赖关系　；参考：《广东财经大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：在当今社会,数据爆炸、信息筛选困难,人们之间的信任关系越来越难建立,但在经济快速发展的环境中,人们又必须不断追求社会活动的效率。在这样的时代背景下,继续性合同也就快速发展起来,人们在与交易对象建立起强烈的信赖关系后,往往不轻易放弃这种认可。不管是企业交易,还是日常生活,人们都越来越多地订立长期合同。除了固有的继续性合同,如租赁合同、合伙合同、委托合同等在生活中处处可见,一些新型的继续性合同类型,如特许经营店合同、加盟连锁专营店合同等蓬勃发展,使继续性合同的种类更加丰富。但这种长期合同除了提高交易效率、稳定交易关系外,同时也具有很强的拘束力,如果合同无法继续维持下去,解除能对当事人起到良好的救济作用。继续性合同的解除因其自身的特点而具有很多特殊性,但我国合同法的解除制度是以一时性合同为蓝本制定的,未考虑到继续性合同的特殊之处,因此相关规定对继续性合同是否适用还有待考察。本文结合华海公司与颐高公司房屋租赁合同纠纷一案,就继续性合同的解除制度分四个部分进行分析。第一部分:在比较分析学者主要观点的前提下,本文尝试着给继续性合同进行判别、定义,概括出三个最基本特征,并且将其分为固有的继续性合同、继续性供给合同两大类。同时采用总——分的结构,在第三节简要提出继续性合同的解除在解除原因、解除权的行使、解除的法律效果三个方面具有特殊性。第二部分:承接上部分内容,分两节具体阐明解除原因的特殊之处。第一节主要围绕协议解除的地位、较一时性合同更广的适用空间以及约定解除的时间与继续性合同期次履行和总给付的关系问题进行分析。第二节以继续性合同的强烈信赖关系特征为基础,论证其完全适用我国目前合同法关于情势变更、不安抗辩权以及违反附随义务的规定的不合理性。第三部分:在解除权的行使上,首先对其行使主体与解除权主体进行区分,对当事人在选择第三人行使解除权时提出了更高的要求;其次在行使方式上,本文确立了以通知解除为主要方式的原则,对当事人通知解除合同也提出了比一时性合同更高的要求,并分析了诉讼解除的生效时间问题。第四部分:在解除的法律效果上,本文对继续性合同解除的效力采清算关系说,分析恢复原状这一救济方式的理论观点和适用情形,并对损害赔偿中可得利益计算的可行性与确定、分配损失赔偿额应注意的问题进行详细论述。
[Abstract]:In today's society, data explosion, information screening is difficult, the trust relationship between people is more and more difficult to establish, but in the environment of rapid economic development, people must continue to pursue the efficiency of social activities. Under the background of this era, the continuing contract develops rapidly. After establishing a strong trust relationship with the trading object, people often do not give up this kind of approval easily. People are increasingly entering into long-term contracts both in business transactions and in daily life. In addition to the inherent continuing contracts, such as lease contracts, partnership contracts, entrustment contracts and so on, some new types of continuing contracts, such as franchising contracts, franchising contracts, franchising contracts, etc., have flourished. To enrich the range of continuing contracts. But this kind of long-term contract not only improves the transaction efficiency, stabilizes the transaction relation, but also has the very strong binding force, if the contract cannot continue to maintain, the lifting can play the good relief function to the party. The dissolution of a continuing contract has many particularities because of its own characteristics. However, the dissolution system of the contract law of our country is based on the temporary contract and does not take into account the special features of the continuing contract. Therefore, the application of relevant provisions to the continuing contract is still to be investigated. Based on the case of the dispute between Huanghai Company and Yigao Company, this paper analyzes the dissolution system of the continuing contract in four parts. In the first part, on the premise of comparing and analyzing the main viewpoints of the scholars, this paper tries to distinguish and define the continuation contract, generalize the three most basic characteristics, and divide it into two categories: the inherent continuation contract and the continuing supply contract. At the same time, with the structure of total-division, in the third section, the author briefly points out that the dissolution of a continuing contract has its particularity in three aspects: the reason of the dissolution, the exercise of the right of rescission, and the legal effect of the rescission. The second part: undertake part of the content, divided into two sections to clarify the special reasons for the lifting. The first section mainly focuses on the status of the termination of the agreement, the wider space of application than the temporary contract, and the relationship between the time of the termination of the agreement and the performance of the duration of the continuing contract and the total payment. The second section is based on the characteristics of the strong trust relationship of the continuing contract, and proves that it is not reasonable to fully apply the provisions of the present contract law of our country concerning the change of circumstances, the right of restless defense and the breach of the accompanying obligation. The third part: in the exercise of the right of rescission, first of all, it distinguishes between the subject of exercise and the subject of the right of rescission, and puts forward a higher request to the parties when they choose the third party to exercise the right of rescission; secondly, it puts forward higher requirements in the way of exercising the right of rescission. In this paper, the principle of notice rescission is established, and a higher requirement is put forward for the parties to notify the dissolution of the contract than the temporary contract, and the question of the effective time of the dissolution of the lawsuit is analyzed. The fourth part: in the legal effect of rescission, this article adopts the liquidation relation to the effect of the termination of the continuing contract, and analyzes the theoretical point of view and the applicable situation of the relief mode of restitution in its original form. The feasibility and determination of the available benefits in the compensation for damages and the problems that should be paid attention to in the allocation of loss compensation are discussed in detail.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D913

【相似文献】