商标侵权惩罚性赔偿研究

发布时间：2018-05-12 05:42

本文选题：商标侵权 + 惩罚性赔偿　；参考：《天津师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：伴随着现阶段我国经济的快速发展,知识产权领域侵权的案件频繁地发生,尤其是商标领域侵权的案件更是屡见不鲜。在立法制度不完善以及商标权本身无形性、可复制性等特点导致被侵权行为难以认定判赔的背景下,2014年5月颁布实施的《商标法》规定了商标侵权损害的惩罚性赔偿,本文中对惩罚性赔偿制度的法律解释和相关的具体实践是我们要研究的重点,笔者拟从文理性、比较性研究和司法实践等方面对惩罚性赔偿制度做探讨。第一部分,首先探明商标侵权惩罚性赔偿的基本概念问题,在了解惩罚性赔偿制度制定的立法背景的前提下,借鉴国外主流观点和国内学者研究,得出其含义是指侵权人即赔偿义务主体对被侵权人给予超过其实际损失的金钱性赔偿,以达到对侵权人惩罚的效果;其次是在认知惩罚性赔偿制度本身具有的惩罚性等功能的前提下与一般的罚款和法定赔偿间的关系,以探究该制度的合理性。第二部分,商标侵权惩罚性赔偿主观方面的研究,根据《商标法》第63条中惩罚性赔偿适用的主观条件是要求侵权人有明显的主观"恶意",结合《著作权法征求意见稿》和《专利法修改草案》中对主观方面"故意"的要求,对"恶意"和"故意"的程度性进行比较以及对其合理性进行分析;其次主观方面的评判标准必然也还要物化到客观标准评判,因此还把"恶意"和"情节严重"这主客观两者之间的关联性明晰了界限,是否可以在判定"恶意"时参考刑事标准也是值得深究的。第三部分,由于前述"恶意"是主观方面的动因,由"恶意"的主观犯意所实施的行为若要受到严格的惩罚必然后果是"情节严重"的,"情节严重"、是否可以具体化为从时间、次数、数额、领域等因素进行认定,结合相关的司法实践研究可以得出相应合理的结论。第四部分,这一部分主要是对惩罚性赔偿的最终数额计算问题做阐述,包括数额计算标准问题的确定和参考因素的分析,结合其他法系国家和地区的相关法律规定和实践对我国新《商标法》63条判赔方面的难以操作性加以明确,并针对这些问题考虑相关因素,以在司法实践中确定一个相对稳定的计算模式,以实现遏制侵权人的不法侵害行为,维护商标权人合法权益的目的。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of our economy at present, the infringement cases in the field of intellectual property occur frequently, especially in the field of trademark infringement. Under the background of imperfect legislative system, imperceptible and replicable trademark rights, which make it difficult to determine the award and compensation for infringement, the Trademark Law promulgated and implemented in May 2014 stipulates the punitive damages for trademark infringement damage. In this paper, the legal interpretation of punitive damages system and relevant specific practice is the focus of our study, the author intends to explore the punitive damages system from the aspects of literary rationality, comparative research and judicial practice. The first part, first of all, explores the basic concept of punitive damages for trademark infringement, on the premise of understanding the legislative background of punitive damages system, draw lessons from the mainstream views of foreign countries and domestic scholars to study. The meaning of it is that the infringer, namely, the subject of the obligation of compensation, gives the infringer monetary compensation in excess of his actual loss, so as to achieve the effect of punishing the infringer. Secondly, on the premise of recognizing the punitive function of punitive damages system itself, the relationship between punitive damages and general fines and statutory damages is discussed in order to explore the rationality of the system. The second part, the research on the subjective aspects of punitive damages for trademark infringement, According to the subjective condition of applying punitive damages in Article 63 of the Trademark Law is to require the infringer to have obvious subjective "malice", combined with the subjective "wilful" requirements in the draft for soliciting opinions of the copyright Law and the revised draft of the Patent Law, The degree of "malice" and "intention" is compared and its rationality is analyzed. Therefore, the relationship between "malice" and "serious circumstances" is clearly defined, and it is worth studying whether we can refer to criminal standards when judging "malice". The third part, because the aforementioned "malice" is the subjective motivation, if the acts committed by the subjective criminal intent of "malice" are to be strictly punished, the inevitable consequence is "the circumstances are serious" and "the circumstances are serious", can it be concretely changed from time to time? Number, amount, field and other factors, combined with the relevant judicial practice can be concluded. In the fourth part, this part mainly expounds the calculation of the final amount of punitive damages, including the determination of the standard of calculation of the amount and the analysis of the reference factors. Combined with the relevant legal provisions and practices of other legal system countries and regions, the article 63 of the new Trademark Law of China is difficult to operate, and the relevant factors are considered in view of these problems. In order to determine a relatively stable calculation model in judicial practice, the purpose of curbing the infringer's illegal infringement and safeguarding the legal rights and interests of the trademark owner is achieved.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.43

【参考文献】