论标准必要专利的滥用及其法律规制

发布时间：2018-05-12 11:31

本文选题：标准必要专利 + FRAND　；参考：《东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：标准必要专利的许可人滥用主要表现在实体和程序两方面,实体上主要是指专利伏击和专利劫持,而程序上主要是威胁申请禁令或排除命令;被许可人滥用主要是反专利劫持和诉求专利无效等。比较分析各国的FRAND和严控禁令等规制措施后提出了完善我国的标准必要专利的相关立法的法律建议:原则性规定标准必要专利权人负有对所有专利使用人按照FRAND条款许可使用和不能滥用FRAND承诺,对专利使用人寻求禁令救济的义务,原则上标准必要专利使用人不得对专利的有效性提出无效的诉讼请求,原则上不允许标准必要专利与使用人达成独占性专利改进技术的回授协议等。
[Abstract]:The abuse of standard necessary patent is mainly manifested in two aspects: entity and procedure, which mainly refers to patent ambush and patent hijacking, while the procedure is mainly to threaten to apply for injunction or exclude order; Licensee abuse is mainly anti-patent hijacking and claims for patent invalidation and so on. After comparing and analyzing the regulatory measures of FRAND and strict control and prohibition in various countries, this paper puts forward some legal suggestions on how to perfect the relevant legislation of standard essential patent in China: the principle stipulates that the standard essential patentee shall be responsible to all patent users in accordance with FRAND. The terms and conditions permit and do not abuse the FRAND promise, The obligation of the patent user to seek injunctive relief shall, in principle, be standardized. The patent user shall not make an invalid claim for the validity of the patent. In principle, it is not allowed to enter into exclusive patent improvement agreement between standard necessary patent and user.
【作者单位】：首都经济贸易大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.42

【相似文献】