城市权利及其法律构造

发布时间：2018-05-13 00:33

本文选题：权利 + 城市　；参考：《苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：城市空间在城市化过程中重要性凸显,城市秩序需要考虑人的主体性,而城市权利的提出已然不是一个事实问题,而是关涉法律制度的变革。从古至今城市权利一直被认可,但不同国家和历史条件下具有个别化的意蕴。在人被分为不同等级的古希腊城邦制下,城市权利意味着一种资格或地位,是参与城邦治理、参与诉讼的公民资格。近代意义上的城市权利起初作为一种集体权利被提出,意在改变城市中弱势群体的境遇。但作为一种法律权利,将城市权利视作个体的权利更能彰显其现实意义。在法律意义上,城市权利被承认、并纳入法律体系加以保护,需要厘清其内在构成要素,明确外部的实现条件和救济途径,使城市权利不仅作为一种人权宣示,更应形成法律意义上行动的权利。
[Abstract]:The importance of urban space in the process of urbanization is prominent. The urban order needs to consider the subjectivity of human beings, and the proposition of urban rights is not a factual issue, but involves the reform of legal system. Since ancient times, urban rights have been recognized, but different countries and historical conditions have individualized implications. Under the ancient Greek city-state system in which people are divided into different levels, urban rights mean a kind of qualification or status, which is the citizenship of participating in city-state governance and litigation. The urban rights in modern times were put forward as a collective right to change the situation of the vulnerable groups in the city. However, as a kind of legal right, it is more meaningful to regard urban rights as individual rights. In the legal sense, the urban rights are recognized and protected by the legal system. It is necessary to clarify its internal elements, clarify the external conditions for its realization and remedy, so that the urban rights are not only declared as a human right. We should form the right to act in the sense of law.
【作者单位】：西北政法大学行政法学院;苏州大学王健法学院;
【基金】：苏州大学优秀博士论文项目“善治理念下的行政公信力研究”(项目编号:233201113)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D913

【参考文献】