环境侵权损害赔偿社会化的研究

发布时间：2018-05-30 22:39

本文选题：环境侵权 + 损害赔偿　；参考：《环境保护》2017年08期

【摘要】：风险社会中,建立在传统社会下的一般侵权损害赔偿原理已经不能妥善应对更为复杂的环境侵权赔偿问题。这是因为环境侵权较传统侵权有三个方面的特殊性。环境侵权中需要适用无过错原则、因果关系推定结果给加害方以及不将违法性作为侵权的必要条件。鉴于此,传统侵权损害赔偿私人化的理论不能完全适用于环境侵权之中,笔者认为应当将环境侵权损害的赔偿进行社会化改良。我国环境侵权损害赔偿社会化制度的构建,需要建立与完善环境责任保险与环境损害赔偿基金两项制度。环境责任保险与环境损害赔偿基金虽然在目的和功能上有些相似,但两者在责任人的归属、法律的范畴上有着明显的区别。
[Abstract]:In the risk society, the general principle of tort compensation established in the traditional society has not been able to deal with the more complex environmental tort compensation properly. This is because of environmental tort than traditional tort has three aspects of particularity. In environmental tort, the principle of no-fault should be applied, the result of causality presumption should be given to the injurious party, and the illegality should not be regarded as the necessary condition of infringement. In view of this, the traditional theory of privatizing tort damages can not be fully applied to environmental tort. The author thinks that the compensation for environmental tort damages should be socialized and improved. In order to construct the socialized system of environmental tort compensation in China, it is necessary to establish and perfect the two systems of environmental liability insurance and environmental damage compensation fund. Although the purpose and function of environmental liability insurance and environmental damage compensation fund are similar, there are obvious differences between them in the attribution of responsible persons and the scope of law.
【作者单位】：北京林业大学人文学院法学系;
【基金】：北京林业大学科技计划创新项目(RW2015-20)
【分类号】：D922.68;D923

【相似文献】