小产权房买卖合法化研究

发布时间：2018-06-10 06:27

本文选题：小产权房 + 国有土地　；参考：《宁波大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：小产权房买卖合法化是大势所趋。相关法律政策对小产权房买卖持禁止的态度,但小产权房的交易近年来却是以有增无减的劲头发展,因为城市化进程的土地无从获取,集体土地无疑能够有效地解决大量涌进城市人们的住房问题。为保护农用地而限制集体土地使用权的交易本无可厚非,而集体土地只能转为国有土地,只能坐等国家廉价征收作为唯一途径,让这种土地制度设计丧失了正当性。文章开篇先大致阐述小产权房的基本情况,分为两个方面来写:第一,概念和类别,厘清本文具体要讨论的哪些小产权房。第二,法律法规对小产权房调控的演变和现有小产权房的规模,说明小产权房在现实生活中的影响,法律对其的态度变化。继而描述审判实践中对小产权房买卖问题的处理,为下文的讨论作进一层的铺垫。首先从著名的“画家村”案入手,介绍小产权房的审理过程中还是有很多争议的。接着分别介绍北京和上海两个地方对于小产权房买卖案件的典型性处理,可以看出还是有很多不同的地方。再者进入本文核心,着力于小产权房买卖合法化的可行性分析:第一,对小产权房的规定上法律和政策上的不和谐,很大程度上导致了国有土地与集体土地的不平等;第二,从私有财产自由处分的角度来讲,限制小产权房的交易不合理;第三,综合英国和美国土地使用政策的考量,国家应该重视保护土地的使用权,政府不与民争富。文章的最后部分给出了一些对现有已经交易的小产权房处理办法,以保障将来小产权房买卖合法化能顺利进行。
[Abstract]:The legalization of small property right houses is the trend of the times. The relevant laws and policies prohibit the sale and purchase of small property houses, but in recent years the transaction of small property houses has been growing unabated, because the land in the process of urbanization is not available. There is no doubt that collective land can effectively solve the housing problem of a large number of urban people. The transaction of restricting collective land use right in order to protect agricultural land is not to blame, and collective land can only be converted into state-owned land, and can only wait for the national cheap expropriation as the only way to make the design of this land system lose its legitimacy. At the beginning of the article, the basic situation of the small property right room is described, which is divided into two aspects: first, the concept and the category, and clarify which small property right house to discuss in this paper. Second, the evolution of laws and regulations on the regulation and control of small property houses and the scale of existing small property houses, which shows the impact of small property houses in real life, and the change of the attitude of the law towards them. Then it describes how to deal with the sale and purchase of small property houses in trial practice, which lays the groundwork for the discussion below. First of all, from the famous "painting Village" case, the introduction of small property rights in the trial process is still a lot of controversy. Then it introduces the typical handling of small property right housing cases in Beijing and Shanghai, which shows that there are still many different places. Furthermore, into the core of this paper, we focus on the feasibility analysis of legalizing the sale and purchase of small property houses. First, the disharmony between laws and policies on the regulation of small property houses leads to the inequality between state-owned land and collective land to a great extent; second, From the angle of free disposition of private property, it is unreasonable to restrict the transaction of small property right house. Third, considering the land use policy of Britain and America, the state should pay attention to protecting the right to use land, and the government should not compete with the people for wealth. In the last part of the paper, some methods of dealing with the existing small property houses are given to ensure that the legalization of the purchase and sale of small property houses can proceed smoothly in the future.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】