民法意思表示动机错误制度研究

发布时间：2018-06-10 11:21

  本文选题：意思表示 + 区分模式　； 参考：《法制博览》2016年06期

【摘要】：动机错误是意思表示错误的重要类型,法律对动机错误是否应予以规范历来饱受争议,大陆法国家立法大多规定了动机错误制度,而我国仅有"重大误解"条款作为错误规范,且一刀切地将动机错误排除在外。比较德日错误制度立法例,我国应当对表示错误与动机错误作一元评价,并确立影响意思表示效力的要件,帮助法官在自由裁量的过程中谋求错误者保护与交易安全的平衡点。
[Abstract]:The error of motive is an important type of error of expression of intention. Whether the error of motive should be regulated by law has always been controversial. Most of the national legislations of continental law have stipulated the system of error of motive, but only the clause of "significant misunderstanding" is regarded as the wrong norm in our country. And in a one-size-fits-all way, the error of motive is excluded. Comparing the legislation of German and Japanese error system, our country should make a monistic evaluation on the error of expression and the error of motive, and establish the elements that affect the effectiveness of the expression of intention, so as to help the judge to seek the balance point between the protection of the wrongdoer and the safety of transaction in the process of discretion.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学;
【分类号】：D913
，

本文编号：2003038