专利侵权抗辩证据获取与运用研究

发布时间：2018-06-10 12:40

本文选题：专利侵权抗辩 + 获取　；参考：《湘潭大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：案件事实的认定需以证据为支撑,在专利侵权判定过程中,证据的选择、收集、筛选和运用关系着抗辩能否成立。被控侵权人作为民事主体,取证途径较为单一,无国家强制力作为保障,在证据的获取与运用过程中主要存在以下障碍:对抗辩事由认识不清,提供的证据与事由不相符,无法支持其抗辩;证据实际掌控者可能出现隐匿、销毁证据等妨碍证据获取的行为,或者证据由国家机关保存,被控告侵权人无权查阅;电子数据等证据由于其载体的特殊性,导致被控侵权人难以保存;证据本身有瑕疵,取证过程存在轻微不合法,证据的表现形式存在缺陷,无法证明证据的真实性;证据之间不能相互印证,对事实的认定无法形成完整的证据链以及证据运用过程中易存在的风险等问题。对相关司法判例进行统计,通过实证研究对证据抗辩的采纳率,分析不同法院在司法实践中对证据的不同判定,可了解被控侵权人运用抗辩证据时应当注意却常常被忽视的问题。作为专利侵权诉讼的被控侵权人可尝试通过检索在先技术对比文件获取无效或现有技术/设计的证据,支持其抗辩;亦可针对易删改、易灭失或需通过公权力才可获取的证据申请法院调查取证,确保被控侵权人能及时获取证据;还可针对电子数据等取证过程与取证结果的真实性容易受到质疑的证据,对其进行保全公证,通过中立机构监督取证提高证据证明力;或者对取证手段或表现形式存在瑕疵的证据,进行补正提高证据能力;另外,还需对于运用过程中可能存在风险的证据,进行使用前的筛选,并注意电子数据结合纸质证据交叉使用。
[Abstract]:The identification of case facts should be supported by evidence. In the process of patent infringement judgment, the choice of evidence, collection, screening and application are related to the establishment of the defense. As a civil subject, the infringers are regarded as a civil subject, and the way of obtaining evidence is relatively simple and without national coercion as the guarantee, there are the following obstacles in the process of obtaining and applying the evidence: confrontation. The evidence is not clearly understood, the evidence provided is not consistent with the cause, and it can not support its defense. The actual control of the evidence may be concealed, the evidence is destroyed, or the evidence is hindering the acquisition of evidence, or the evidence is kept by the state organ, and the infringer is accused of no right to consult; the electronic data, such as the particularity of its carrier, leads to the difficulty of the alleged infringer. In order to preserve it, the evidence itself has flaws, the evidence process has a slight illegality, the manifestation of the evidence is defective, it can not prove the authenticity of the evidence; the evidence can not be confirmed by each other, the fact is not formed, the whole evidence chain is formed and the risk of the evidence in the process of the evidence is used. The relevant judicial precedents are counted, Through the empirical study of the adoption rate of evidence defense and the analysis of the different judgments in the judicial practice of the different courts, it can be understood that the accused should pay attention to the use of the defense evidence but often be ignored. The accused infringer who is a patent infringement lawsuit can try to obtain the invalid or present by retrieving the prior technical contrast documents. There is evidence of Technology / design to support its defense; it can also apply to court investigation and evidence for evidence that can be easily deleted, easily lost or required by public power to ensure that the accused is able to obtain evidence in time; it can also protect the evidence of the evidence of the forensic process of electronic data and the true authenticity of the results of the evidence. Evidence, through the supervision of evidence by neutral institutions to improve evidence proof, or evidence of defects in the means or manifestations of evidence, to improve the ability to improve evidence; in addition, it needs to be screened before use of evidence that may exist in the process of application, and the cross use of electronic data and paper evidence.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.42

【参考文献】