融资租赁合同中出租人的期待权问题

发布时间：2018-06-15 09:19

本文选题：拒付租金 + 法律救济　；参考：《政治与法律》2015年05期

【摘要】：融资租赁交易中承租人负有支付租金的绝对义务,不得以任何事由作为拒付租金的抗辩事由。在融资租赁合同履行中,当承租人未按约支付租金时,出租人有权请求承租人加速支付租金、损害赔偿、解除租赁合同和取回租赁物。因租赁物被承租人实际占有,出租人只是名义所有权人,难以对抗拒付租金的承租人,取回租赁物也难以实现。有鉴于此,应当在融资租赁关系中赋予出租人以期待权,表现为融资租赁合同中出租人与承租人可以约定承租人实际占有和使用租赁物达到一定的期间、欠租连续超过两期或达到租金总额的百分之十五、经催告超过一个付租期间仍拒付租金的,承租人应无条件买下租赁物。在我国,出租人期待权的立法需要发挥学说与指导性案例的作用,强化最高人民法院司法解释在具体法律实践中的技术性功能,立法上采取分散立法模式,最终纳入私法体系。
[Abstract]:In financial lease transactions, the lessee has the absolute obligation to pay rent and shall not defend the refusal to pay rent by any reason. In the performance of the financial lease contract, when the lessee fails to pay the rent according to the contract, the lessor has the right to request the lessee to speed up the payment of rent, to compensate for damages, to terminate the lease contract and to take back the lease item. Because the lease item is actually occupied by the lessee, the lessor is only the nominal owner, it is difficult to confront the lessee who refuses to pay the rent, and it is difficult to obtain the lease item. In view of this, the lessor should be given the right of expectation in the financial lease relationship. In the financial lease contract, the lessor and the lessee may agree that the lessee actually occupies and uses the lease item for a certain period. The lessee shall buy the lease item unconditionally if he fails to pay the rent for more than two consecutive instalments or up to 15% of the total rent amount after being urged to pay the rent for more than one period. In our country, the legislation of lessor's right of expectation needs to play the role of doctrine and guiding cases, strengthen the technical function of judicial interpretation of the Supreme people's Court in specific legal practice, adopt the decentralized legislative mode in legislation, and finally bring it into the private law system.
【作者单位】：广东金融学院法律系;
【基金】：2012年国家社科基金项目“期待权理论的展开与制度构建研究”(项目编号:12BFX076)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D923.6

【参考文献】