当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

包价旅游合同履行辅助人民事责任研究

发布时间:2018-07-04 13:50

  本文选题:履行辅助人 + 违约责任 ; 参考:《南昌大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:旅游履行辅助人指的是与旅行社存在合同关系,协助旅行社履行包价旅游合同的部分旅游服务义务,而实际上提供相关旅游服务的自然人或法人。目前,对包价旅游合同履行辅助人的法律地位和法律概念的研究往往受到传统民法学中债务人之履行辅助人制度影响,所以其一直未形成统一而坚实的理论基础;此外,旅游履行辅助人的主体划分也不合理,对于公共交通运营者是否作为旅游履行辅助人的问题也没有统一的意见。这些问题都会导致履行辅助人与旅行社、游客之间的权利义务不够明确。实践中由于包价旅游合同的旅游履行辅助人不履行相关义务导致的旅游纠纷经常发生,所以为了合理地解决这些纠纷问题,对其概念的合理界定、明确其法律地位、规范其应有的民事责任就显得尤为重要。本文探讨了我国旅游履行辅助人在包价旅游活动中的概念、地位、类型以及应当承担的民事责任,以期为完善我国旅游履行辅助人民事责任制度提供一些参考。本文以研究论文的形式,通过对包价旅游合同履行辅助人的分析研究,旨在明确其法律概念和地位并理清其民事法律责任。本文共分为五大部分。第一部分是引言,简要分析了我国旅游履行辅助人的现状、相关的案例分析、我国旅游履行辅助人民事责任制度存在的问题。第二部分介绍了旅游辅助服务人的概述,包括了包价旅游的概念、特征和包价旅游合同的概念和特征;旅游辅助服务人概念、地位和具体类型和承担责任的具体案例分析进行了简单的阐述。第三部分是对包价旅游合同的履行辅助人所承担的违约责任研究,分析哪种情形下旅游履行辅助人才承担违约责任及违约责任的形态;指出其不承担包价旅游合同责任的基础理论是合同相对性原理,并结合境内外法律规定对其进行分析。第四部分是对包价旅游合同的履行辅助人所承担的侵权责任研究,首先分析其承担侵权责任的基础是安全保障义务,进而分析了其安全保障义务的概念,来源和具体内容;其次分析了承担侵权责任的归责原则和判断标准,最后把其承担侵权责任的情形分成2种类型,即因自身原因担侵权责任和因第三人原因担侵权责任。第五部分介绍了对旅游辅助服务人责任制度的完善的几点建议:首先我国对旅游履行辅助人定位不够明确,所以要明确其概念和在旅游活动中的地位;其次要明确其承担民事责任的不同请求权基础;再次明确第三人侵权时第三人与旅游履行辅助人的的责任分配;最后明确旅游履行辅助人的民事责任减免制度。
[Abstract]:Tourism performance Auxiliary refers to the existence of a contractual relationship with the travel agency to assist the travel agency in fulfilling some of the tour service obligations of the package tourism contract, but in fact the natural person or legal person who provides the related tourism services. At present, the research on the legal status and legal concept of the assistive party to fulfill the contract of package tourism is often influenced by the system of the debtor in the traditional civil law, so it has not formed a unified and solid theoretical foundation. It is also unreasonable to divide the main body of tourist performance auxiliaries, and there is no unified opinion on whether the public transport operators are the auxiliary persons of tourism performance. These problems will lead to the fulfilment of assistive and travel agencies, tourists between the rights and obligations are not clear. In practice, the tourism disputes caused by the tour performance auxiliaries' failure to perform the related obligations often occur, so in order to solve these disputes reasonably, the concept is reasonably defined and its legal status is clearly defined. It is particularly important to standardize its due civil liability. This paper probes into the concept, status, type and civil liability of tourism performance auxiliaries in package tourism activities in China, in order to provide some references for perfecting the civil liability system of tourism performance auxiliaries in China. In the form of a research paper, this paper aims to clarify its legal concept and status and clarify its civil legal liability through the analysis and study of the assistant party to fulfill the package tour contract. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part is the introduction, which briefly analyzes the present situation of tourism performance assistant in our country, the relevant case analysis, the problems existing in the civil liability system of tourism performance assistant in our country. The second part introduces the overview of tourism assistant service providers, including the concept of package tourism, characteristics and the concept and characteristics of package tourism contract, tourism assistant service person concept, The status and specific types of specific cases and the responsibility of the analysis of the simple elaboration. The third part is the research of the breach liability of the assistant party of the package price tourism contract, and analyzes the form of the default responsibility and the default liability of the tourism performing assistant talents under which circumstances; It is pointed out that the basic theory of its non-assumption of contract liability is the principle of relativity of contract, and it is analyzed in combination with the domestic and foreign laws and regulations. The fourth part is the research on the tort liability of the assistant party of the package price tourism contract. Firstly, it analyzes that the basis of the tort liability is the duty of safety and security, and then analyzes the concept, source and concrete content of the duty of safety and security. Secondly, it analyzes the liability principle and judgment standard of tort liability, and finally divides its liability into two types, that is, the tort liability for its own reasons and the tort liability for the third party. The fifth part introduces some suggestions on how to perfect the responsibility system of tourism assistant service: firstly, the orientation of tourism assistant is not clear enough, so we should define its concept and position in tourism activities; Secondly, it should make clear the different claim basis of its civil liability; clarify the distribution of liability between the third party and the tourist helper when the third party torts again; finally, clear the relief system of the civil liability of the tourism performance assistant.
【学位授予单位】:南昌大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.294;D923.6

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 许政贤;;旅游契约履行辅助人之责任——以台湾地区法院实务见解为中心[J];苏州大学学报(法学版);2017年01期

2 李珊;杨峰;;旅游纠纷中的连带责任基础分析——以特定身份关联说为视角[J];学术探索;2016年06期

3 韩长印;;旅行社责任险的责任范围问题[J];法学家;2016年01期

4 汪旭鹏;;《旅游法》履行辅助人制度评析[J];旅游学刊;2015年09期

5 谢登科;;论旅游合同纠纷中的精神损害赔偿——基于实证主义的阐释[J];旅游学刊;2015年07期

6 关长宇;尚希文;;美国侵权法中连带责任制度的改革方案及其启示[J];江西财经大学学报;2015年02期

7 邓蕊;;论旅游辅助服务者的法律责任[J];西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2015年02期

8 叶金强;;旅游纠纷中的连带责任——以“焦建军与中山国旅等旅游侵权纠纷案”为参照[J];法学;2015年02期

9 邓勇;蔡睿;;网络服务提供者连带责任的解释论基础——以“行为关联”的共同侵权为视角[J];党政干部学刊;2015年01期

10 李朝晖;;旅游交通事故若干问题的思考——兼论《旅游法》第七十一条[J];法制与社会;2014年20期

相关硕士学位论文 前4条

1 蒋傲雨;我国旅游合同纠纷民事责任认定与解决机制研究[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2016年

2 施巧奇;包价旅游合同履行辅助人的法律地位及责任[D];大连海事大学;2015年

3 周筱蕴;旅行社与履行辅助人的责任分配问题研究[D];浙江大学;2014年

4 王皎;焦某诉某国际旅行社侵权纠纷案评析[D];湖南大学;2014年



本文编号:2096277

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2096277.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户63264***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com