微博名誉侵权责任认定法律问题研究
发布时间：2018-08-28 12:16
【摘要】：早在2012年,我国就已经成为微博用户最多的国家,近年来,微博发展方兴未艾,与此同时,微博名誉侵权的现象层出不穷,然而,对微博名誉侵权的责任认定还存在很多待补充之处。除引言和结语外,本文共四章。第一章由微博名誉侵权的典型案例引出的相应的法律思考,指出当下微博名誉侵权责任认定中的突出问题;第二章可分为三部分,首先是责任主体方面,从微博发布者,微博转载者、评论者,微博审核者这几个主体来进行讨论,论述了其成为侵权主体的法律依据和理论依据。其次是责任构成方面,从侵权行为、损害事实、因果关系、主观过错加以论述,其中重点写了主观过错的认定。最后是责任形式方面,主要有停止侵害,恢复名誉、消除影响,赔礼道歉,赔偿损失等,并对其中学界争议较大的赔礼道歉和赔偿损失这两种责任形式进行了重点论述。第三章,综合概括了微博名誉侵权免责事由,首先是内容真实,其次是对“公众人”(公众人物及公众法人)的适度监督与批评,最后是其他免责事由,囊括了正当行使权利,第三人过错,依法执行职务,合理引用,受害人同意等。第四章,从立法、司法、实践三个层面提出了微博名誉侵权责任认定的相关建议,希望能厘清微博名誉侵权责任认定中较为模糊的问题。
[Abstract]:As early as 2012, China has become the country with the largest number of users of Weibo. In recent years, the development of Weibo is in the ascendant. At the same time, the phenomenon of reputation infringement of Weibo is emerging in endlessly, however, There are still a lot to add to Weibo's responsibility for reputation infringement. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, there are four chapters in this paper. The first chapter draws the corresponding legal thinking from the typical case of Weibo's reputation infringement, and points out the prominent problems in the cognizance of Weibo's reputation tort liability at present; the second chapter can be divided into three parts, first of all, the subject of responsibility, from Weibo publisher, Weibo reprinted, commentator, Weibo examiner these several main body to carry on the discussion, elaborated its becomes the infringement subject the legal basis and the theory basis. The second is liability constitution, from tort, damage facts, causality, subjective fault to be discussed, which focuses on the identification of subjective fault. Finally, the form of liability, mainly to stop infringement, restore reputation, eliminate the impact, apology, compensation for losses and so on, and the academic controversy of apology and compensation for the loss of these two forms of liability are discussed emphatically. The third chapter summarizes the reasons for Weibo's reputation infringement, firstly, the content is true, secondly, the proper supervision and criticism of "public person" (public figure and public legal person), and finally other exonerations, including the proper exercise of right. The third person's fault, the execution of duties according to law, reasonable reference, victim's consent, etc. The fourth chapter, from the legislative, judicial, practical aspects of Weibo's reputation tort liability identification of the relevant recommendations, hoping to clarify the relatively vague issues in the cognizance of Weibo reputation tort liability.
【学位授予单位】：首都经济贸易大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923
本文编号：2209369
[Abstract]:As early as 2012, China has become the country with the largest number of users of Weibo. In recent years, the development of Weibo is in the ascendant. At the same time, the phenomenon of reputation infringement of Weibo is emerging in endlessly, however, There are still a lot to add to Weibo's responsibility for reputation infringement. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, there are four chapters in this paper. The first chapter draws the corresponding legal thinking from the typical case of Weibo's reputation infringement, and points out the prominent problems in the cognizance of Weibo's reputation tort liability at present; the second chapter can be divided into three parts, first of all, the subject of responsibility, from Weibo publisher, Weibo reprinted, commentator, Weibo examiner these several main body to carry on the discussion, elaborated its becomes the infringement subject the legal basis and the theory basis. The second is liability constitution, from tort, damage facts, causality, subjective fault to be discussed, which focuses on the identification of subjective fault. Finally, the form of liability, mainly to stop infringement, restore reputation, eliminate the impact, apology, compensation for losses and so on, and the academic controversy of apology and compensation for the loss of these two forms of liability are discussed emphatically. The third chapter summarizes the reasons for Weibo's reputation infringement, firstly, the content is true, secondly, the proper supervision and criticism of "public person" (public figure and public legal person), and finally other exonerations, including the proper exercise of right. The third person's fault, the execution of duties according to law, reasonable reference, victim's consent, etc. The fourth chapter, from the legislative, judicial, practical aspects of Weibo's reputation tort liability identification of the relevant recommendations, hoping to clarify the relatively vague issues in the cognizance of Weibo reputation tort liability.
【学位授予单位】：首都经济贸易大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 潘强;唐华彭;;浅析公民言论自由与官员名誉权之关系[J];河南公安高等专科学校学报;2009年01期
2 孙晶;;从公众人物起诉媒体侵犯名誉权看新闻立法的必要性[J];黑龙江科学;2013年10期
3 靖鸣;祁丽婷;;微博名誉侵权现象及其应对之策[J];青年记者;2012年28期
4 赖泽斌;;论微博侵权责任[J];特区经济;2013年09期
5 陈友云;;微博:站在法律的断桥上——言论自由与名誉权保护之间[J];现代经济信息;2011年23期
6 鲁春雅;;网络服务提供者侵权责任的类型化解读[J];政治与法律;2011年04期
7 王利明;公众人物人格权的限制和保护[J];中州学刊;2005年02期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 王璐;英美法律实践对我国微博名誉权保护的启示[D];华东政法大学;2013年
，本文编号：2209369
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2209369.html
