当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

大数据时代侵犯财产隐私权问题研究

发布时间:2018-08-28 13:19
【摘要】:现代社会已经进入大数据时代。大数据技术的可操作性、数据信息的海量性和自由流动性极大地改变了我们人们的生活方式,给人们的生活带来诸多便利。但是利用大数据技术对公民在互联网上的个人信息进行挖掘,也逐渐构成对公民隐私权的挑战,由此所引发的法律问题也是前所未有的。隐私权一直以来是一个非常复杂的概念,而在信息过度暴露的大数据时代,隐私权范围扩大,隐私内涵更加复杂,数字技术更加难以掌控,如果我们想要保护隐私权,就必须重新思考我们对于隐私权的认知。自2012年以来,大数据就成为国内外各界学者普遍关注的热点问题,而大数据时代所引发的关于用户网络隐私的侵权问题也获得越来越多不同学科专业人士的关注。任何一项新技术的背后,都可能带来“阵痛”。网络隐私安全问题由来已久,大数据时代的到来,让互联网成为名副其实的“监察室”,也给网络隐私问题增添许多新的特点,这其中一个突出特点就是隐私权的财产性质增强,具体表现在:一种是将隐私直接作为财物进行交易,另一种则是对隐私的内含经济价值进行发掘。大数据时代下互联网环境中的个人隐私具有商品化特征,网络信息海量、传播迅速、成本低廉、受众广泛、大数据技术日益成熟,使侵权行为人极易对公民有价值的个人隐私进行收集、盗取、记录、分析、传播和售卖,并从中获得经济利益。大数据时代中公民网络隐私权遭遇侵犯,不仅会给受害者造成精神痛苦,还可能会带来一定的财产损失。在这样的背景下,作者试图提出“财产隐私权”概念,通过对这一全新概念的阐述,探索大数据时代公民在互联网上隐私权遭遇侵犯的新特点。本文主要采取文献研究法和比较研究法,通过对大数据时代公民在互联网上发生的财产隐私权侵权行为的分析,对国内外关于隐私权及网络隐私权保护模式的比较,总结出大数据时代公民财产隐私权侵权行为的特征、表现形式、构成要件以及原因,并结合中国国情和发展实际试图从技术、公民、企业和国家四个方面探索大数据时代公民财产隐私保护策略。
[Abstract]:Modern society has entered the era of big data. The maneuverability of big data technology, the magnanimity of data and information and the free mobility have greatly changed the way of life of our people and brought many conveniences to our lives. However, the use of big data technology to excavate the personal information of citizens on the Internet has gradually posed a challenge to citizens' right to privacy, resulting in unprecedented legal problems. Privacy has always been a very complex concept, and in the age of big data, where information is overexposed, the scope of privacy is expanded, the meaning of privacy is more complex, and digital technology is more difficult to control. If we want to protect the right to privacy, We must rethink our perception of privacy. Since 2012, big data has become a hot issue that scholars from all walks of life at home and abroad have paid close attention to, and the infringement of user's network privacy caused by the era of big data has been paid more and more attention to by more and more professionals from different disciplines. Any new technology behind, can bring "labor pain." The issue of network privacy security has a long history. With the advent of big data's time, the Internet has become a "monitoring room" worthy of its name, and it has also added many new features to the issue of network privacy. One of the outstanding features is that the property nature of the right of privacy is enhanced, which is manifested in: one is dealing with privacy as property directly, the other is to explore the economic value of privacy. In the era of big data, personal privacy in the Internet environment is characterized by commercialization, mass of information on the Internet, rapid dissemination, low cost, wide audience, and the growing maturity of big data technology. The tortfeasor is easy to collect, steal, record, analyze, disseminate and sell the valuable personal privacy of citizens, and obtain economic benefits from it. In big data's time, the citizen's network privacy was infringed, which will not only cause mental pain to the victims, but also bring some property loss. In this context, the author tries to put forward the concept of "property privacy", through the elaboration of this new concept, to explore the new characteristics of the violation of privacy rights of citizens in big data era on the Internet. This article mainly adopts the literature research method and the comparative research method, through the analysis to the property privacy right infringement behavior which happened on the Internet in the big data era, compares the privacy right and the network privacy protection mode at home and abroad. Summing up the characteristics, forms, elements and reasons of the infringement of the right to property privacy of the citizens in big data's time, and combining the national conditions of China and the actual development of China, trying to make an attempt from the technology, citizens, The enterprises and the state explore the strategy of protecting the privacy of the citizens' property in big data's time.
【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 顾理平;杨苗;;个人隐私数据“二次使用”中的边界[J];新闻与传播研究;2016年09期

2 匡文波;黄琦翔;江波;;大数据热的冷思考[J];新闻与写作;2016年05期

3 胡颖;顾理平;;我国网络隐私权的立法保护研究[J];新闻大学;2016年02期

4 李艺;;大数据时代的被遗忘权[J];当代传播;2016年02期

5 薛可;何佳;余明阳;;社会化媒体中隐私悖论的影响因素研究[J];当代传播;2016年01期

6 梁辰曦;董天策;;试论大数据背景下“被遗忘权”的属性及其边界[J];学术研究;2015年09期

7 黄稼辉;;大数据时代:意见传播还是意义传播——基于哲学视角的隐私权研究[J];当代传播;2015年05期

8 周丽娜;;大数据背景下的网络隐私法律保护:搜索引擎、社交媒体与被遗忘权[J];国际新闻界;2015年08期

9 张新宝;;从隐私到个人信息:利益再衡量的理论与制度安排[J];中国法学;2015年03期

10 薛亚君;;数字时代个人信息的被遗忘权[J];情报理论与实践;2015年04期

相关硕士学位论文 前8条

1 童拿云;大数据时代的个人隐私保护[D];上海师范大学;2015年

2 王永红;论大数据时代公民网络隐私权的民法保护[D];山西财经大学;2015年

3 李彤;论大数据时代网络隐私权的保护[D];河北大学;2014年

4 李国宇;大数据时代背景下的隐私权问题研究[D];复旦大学;2014年

5 李积兵;网络新闻侵害名誉权法律问题研究[D];复旦大学;2008年

6 王叙;网络隐私权侵权的法律保护[D];中国政法大学;2007年

7 张廷波;网络服务商的隐私权侵权责任问题[D];北京大学;2007年

8 宋莉;网络服务商在网络隐私权侵权中的民事责任[D];安徽大学;2005年



本文编号:2209503

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2209503.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户7f150***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com