惩罚性赔偿在合同领域的扩张适用
[Abstract]:Punitive damages have been made, and punitive damages have been formed in modern sense. Now the punitive damages system has developed and developed in the United States and has been universally accepted and recognized by the majority of Anglo-American law countries and some civil law countries. It is of great significance to play an active role in punishing and restraining wrongful acts, protecting the rights and interests of victims, preventing similar behaviors from happening again, and safeguarding social equity and justice. However, the development of punitive damages system is not plain sailing. Since the emergence of punitive damages system, its scope of application has been widely disputed, and the main focus of the dispute lies in the punitive damages system except for the field of tort law. can also be applied to the field of contract law. At present, the punitive damages system has been basically applied in the field of tort law in our country, but it has rarely seen its figure in the field of contract law, even if there are, It is also that there are some clauses with punitive damages in the scattered law of two single-line law and judicial interpretation with contractual legal relation, although these clauses play a certain positive role, it also shows the preliminary recognition of punitive damages in the field of contract law in China. However, this still cannot be regarded as a system of punitive damages liability in the contract law of our country, and the scope of application is still narrow; at the same time, the provisions with punitive damages are too crude and rigid, and there is no concern about many key problems of punitive damages. In view of this situation, it is necessary to expand its application space in the field of contracts, To make the system give full play to its true value and advantage in contract law. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate why punitive damages can be expanded and applied in the field of contract, and how to apply it, to provide theoretical support for the applicable framework of the system, and to seek a coordinated response to the theoretical obstacles and conflicts to which the system applies. This paper analyzes some important theoretical problems of punitive damages system, and puts forward some concrete construction for punitive damages in the field of contract. The full text is divided into four chapters. The first chapter discusses the basic connotation and system value of punitive damages system from three aspects: the concept, characteristic and main function of punitive compensation system. The second chapter analyzes the conflict between the punitive damages system and the traditional theory of contract law, and aims at re-recognizing the contradiction and conflict of the two, seeking the path of harmonic contradiction, clearing the obstacles for punitive damages in the contract field, paving the way, thereby giving the following punitive damages to the application of the contract field to play the role of the brick-throwing jade. The third chapter is to list the important theoretical problems faced by punitive damages in the application of the contract field, and find solutions to these problems, prove the solution, and apply the punitive damages to the application of punitive damages in the contract field, respectively. In the contract law, it is necessary to choose which legislative mode should be chosen, and whether it is necessary to establish a contract effectively as a prerequisite for its application is discussed in detail. The fourth chapter introduces the application of punitive damages system in our country's contract field. This chapter sets forth the concept of the punitive compensation liability mechanism in the field of contract liability in the contract law of China from three aspects: the applicable requirements of punitive damages, the range of applicable cases and the amount of punitive damages.
【学位授予单位】:西北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王本宏,范圣兵;论惩罚性赔偿在我国侵权法领域的适用[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2002年03期
2 金福海;惩罚性赔偿不宜纳入我国民法典[J];烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2003年02期
3 赵志钢;惩罚性赔偿的基本问题[J];山东教育学院学报;2005年01期
4 郑宁;王君;;惩罚性赔偿的适用问题探析[J];郧阳师范高等专科学校学报;2006年03期
5 李平;;惩罚性赔偿在我国侵权法领域的适用[J];江淮论坛;2006年05期
6 冯泠;;美国惩罚性赔偿适用若干法律问题探究[J];四川理工学院学报(社会科学版);2007年01期
7 刘瑾;;煤矿安全责任适用惩罚性赔偿刍议[J];中国矿业;2007年04期
8 赵海萍;;试论惩罚性赔偿数额的确定[J];宜宾学院学报;2007年01期
9 向婧;潘利红;;浅谈惩罚性赔偿对中国立法的启示[J];法制与社会;2007年11期
10 陈创;;从三鹿奶粉事件看我国惩罚性赔偿的适用[J];南京财经大学学报;2008年06期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 陈屹立;;惩罚性赔偿的根据与适用:法经济学观点[A];2006年度(第四届)中国法经济学论坛会议论文集[C];2006年
2 邵辰杰;田侃;喻小勇;;无伤害药品惩罚性赔偿刍议[A];2013年中国药学会药事管理专业委员会年会暨“医药安全与科学发展”学术论坛论文集(上册)[C];2013年
3 白玫;;论我国的惩罚性赔偿制度——以侵权领域的规定为中心[A];全国律协经济专业委员会2010论坛(成都)论文集[C];2010年
4 徐琳;张泽;;知假买假行为适用惩罚性赔偿的法律思考[A];当代法学论坛(2008年第3辑)[C];2008年
5 李秀芬;陈瑶;;美国保险法上惩罚性赔偿责任的可保性[A];中国商法年刊(2008):金融法制的现代化[C];2008年
6 刘立军;;商品房销售中的惩罚性赔偿的适用问题研究[A];中国民商法实务论坛论文集[C];2004年
7 谌雪燕;;论商品房买卖合同中的惩罚性赔偿[A];当代法学论坛(2008年第3辑)[C];2008年
8 孙玉荣;;环境侵权民事责任中的惩罚性赔偿研究[A];资源节约型、环境友好型社会建设与环境资源法的热点问题研究——2006年全国环境资源法学研讨会论文集(一)[C];2006年
9 胡欣;;环境侵权适用惩罚性赔偿研究[A];资源节约型、环境友好型社会建设与环境资源法的热点问题研究——2006年全国环境资源法学研讨会论文集(一)[C];2006年
10 姜治鹏;;浅议商品房买卖合同中的惩罚性赔偿[A];中国民商法实务论坛论文集[C];2004年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 许身健;吓阻虚假广告,不妨引入惩罚性赔偿[N];检察日报;2007年
2 安徽省马鞍山市中级人民法院 赵庆飞;惩罚性赔偿规则的经济学分析[N];人民法院报;2009年
3 贾新光;加大法律惩罚性赔偿力度[N];北京商报;2013年
4 本报记者 王硕;惩罚性赔偿还应加码[N];中国消费者报;2013年
5 任腾飞;中国式惩罚性赔偿:蚂蚁何时能震慑大象[N];中国企业报;2013年
6 本报记者 蔡岩红;专家建议加入合理的惩罚性赔偿[N];法制日报;2013年
7 吴杭民;惩罚性赔偿能不能更加“狠辣”[N];工人日报;2013年
8 本报记者 陈丽平;惩罚性赔偿应只设下限不设上限[N];法制日报;2013年
9 葛珉;商品房买卖如何适用惩罚性赔偿[N];中国经济时报;2004年
10 清华大学法学院副教授、法学博士 韩世远;消费者合同与惩罚性赔偿[N];人民法院报;2004年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 余艺;惩罚性赔偿研究[D];西南政法大学;2008年
2 杜称华;惩罚性赔偿的法理与应用[D];武汉大学;2012年
3 黄娅琴;惩罚性赔偿研究[D];中央民族大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 李锌;法经济学视野下惩罚性赔偿研究[D];复旦大学;2008年
2 韩京耀;论惩罚性赔偿[D];西南政法大学;2009年
3 余永明;论产品侵权责任中的惩罚性赔偿[D];内蒙古大学;2009年
4 张婷;论惩罚性赔偿在我国侵权领域的承认与适用[D];山东大学;2010年
5 贺云蓉;试论惩罚性赔偿在我国的适用[D];复旦大学;2009年
6 吕继凌;论惩罚性赔偿在我国侵权法中的适用[D];西南财经大学;2010年
7 王娟;惩罚性赔偿在我国存在的问题及完善[D];吉林大学;2011年
8 张威;论我国的惩罚性赔偿金[D];宁波大学;2011年
9 彭彬;惩罚性赔偿立法研究[D];华中师范大学;2005年
10 邢琬莹;论惩罚性赔偿在反垄断领域的适用[D];华东政法大学;2007年
,本文编号:2312560
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2312560.html