冒名顶替上大学侵权责任研究

发布时间：2018-12-06 19:04

【摘要】：教育是关乎公民切身利益的大事,也是公民达到自我发展的目标。教育也是一个国家的支撑,也是民族兴旺发达的力量源泉。我国教育事业近年来取得了飞跃式的发展,但是因为地域教育资源的分配不均,教育机会不均等,不同类型和不同教育阶段资源分歧明显扩大,正是因此公民的受教育权遭受他人侵犯的事件也变多。近年来,冒名顶替上大学案件被媒体广泛报道,但救济方式不足以弥补被侵权人的损失,救济方式单一、缺失,使得法律制度上面临着深刻的考验。构建冒名顶替上大学的法律保护机制,既保护公民自己的合法权益又能促进我国教育事业的良性发展。第一部分:从侵权责任的构成要件角度分析冒名顶替上大学的的各项要件,来进一步分析冒名顶替上大学是如何符合侵权责任的。第二部分:对冒名顶替上大学的客体进行准确的定位,通过对姓名权、受教育权以及身份权问题进行深入分析和讨论,再对接下来责任承担有法律上的准确应对。第三部分:对冒名顶替上大学的侵权责任主体进行分析,切实落实到各侵权责任主体,明确各个责任人责任大小。第四部分:对此类冒名顶替上大学侵权案件进行物质和精神损害赔偿进行分析和研究,对于物质损害问题应该如何赔偿、赔偿多少进行分析和研究;而对精神损害赔偿问题,则讨论侵犯姓名权、身份权、受教育权是否要精神损失赔偿,以及精神损害赔偿数额多少是合理范围。
[Abstract]:Education is a matter of vital interest to citizens, and it is also a goal for citizens to achieve self-development. Education is also the support of a country, but also the source of national prosperity. In recent years, China's educational undertakings have made leaps and bounds. However, due to the uneven distribution of regional educational resources and unequal educational opportunities, the differences in resources between different types and stages of education have obviously expanded. It is as a result that citizens' right to education is violated by others. In recent years, the case of impersonating university has been widely reported by the media, but the relief method is not enough to make up for the loss of the infringer, the relief method is single and missing, which makes the legal system face a profound test. Constructing the legal protection mechanism of impersonating the university can not only protect the citizens' legitimate rights and interests, but also promote the benign development of our country's education. The first part: from the angle of the constitutive requirements of tort liability, this paper analyzes the elements of impersonating the university, and further analyzes how the impostor to attend the university accords with the tort liability. The second part: the object of impersonating the university carries on the accurate localization, through carries on the thorough analysis and the discussion to the name right, the education right and the identity right question, then bears the legal accurate response to the following responsibility. The third part: the author analyzes the subject of tort liability of impersonating the university, practically implements to the subject of tort liability, and clarifies the liability of each responsible person. The fourth part: this kind of impostor to go to the university tort case carries on the material and the spiritual damage compensation to carry on the analysis and the research, to the material damage question how should compensate, the compensation amount carries on the analysis and the research; As for the compensation for mental damage, it is discussed whether the right to a name, the right to identity, the right to education should be compensated for mental loss, and the amount of compensation for mental damage is reasonable.
【学位授予单位】：海南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】