外观设计侵权判定及判例研究

发布时间：2018-12-06 19:38

【摘要】：我国的外观设计专利一直存在着数量庞大但质量不高的尴尬局面,这种情况的出现是由许多原因造成的,我国作为一个制造业大国,每年都会出现大量的外观设计专利纠纷案件,尽管经过了三次修改之后的《专利法》已经明确了原先存在的许多问题,但是笔者发现,对于一些最近出现的、案情比较复杂的判例,外观设计专利权人的利益仍然可能得不到良好的保护,尤其是在侵权判定主体和侵权判定标准方面仍然存在着比较明显的争议和模糊的法律空间。针对这种情况,有必要结合具体案例对外观设计侵权判定的部分理论进行研究。全文共分为五章第一章绪论主要阐述了外观设计的历史沿革、现状以及最新的发展情况,首先以法国为源头,介绍法国、英国、日本、美国等主要西方国家外观设计法律制度的建立历史。然后介绍了中国的知识产权保护体系和外观设计保护法律法规从无到有不断完善至今的历史进程。第二章提出了外观设计保护存在的问题,即创新程度普遍不高、缺乏创新点的垃圾专利大量存在。进而分析了问题产生的主要原因。第三章细化分析外观设计侵权判定的主体,先分别介绍了美国、英国、欧盟、日本对于外观设计侵权判定主体的法律规定,再结合具体案例分析几种特殊情况下的外观设计侵权判定主体的选择。第四章阐述了外观设计侵权判定的标准,主要分为混淆标准和创新标准。首先引用了菲亚特起诉长城汽车的案件,来分析混淆标准的弊端和不足,包括了内涵模糊不清、缺乏理论立足点和有欠社会公正性。其次结合苏泊尔与九阳之间的外观设计专利纠纷案,进一步阐述了混淆标准的弊端和创新标准的优越性。第五章提出了一些对于外观设计侵权判定的建议,主要包括两点,首先对于不同类型的产品,在侵权判定主体上要进行细分,主要分为非日常用品、购买者与使用者不同、中间产品。其次为了弥补混淆标准的缺陷和不足,建议应该逐渐将混淆标准改为创新标准,以创新标准作为判断两者是否相似和相同的依据。
[Abstract]:There has always been an embarrassing situation of large quantity but low quality of design patents in China, which is caused by many reasons. As a large manufacturing country, China is a big manufacturing country. Every year there are a large number of patent disputes over designs. Although the Patent Law, which has been amended three times, has identified many problems, the author finds that, for some of the most recent cases, Because of the complicated case law, the interests of the design patentee may not be well protected, especially in the subject of infringement judgment and the judgment standard of infringement, there are still obvious disputes and vague legal space. In view of this situation, it is necessary to study part of the theory of design tort judgment combined with specific cases. The paper is divided into five chapters: the first chapter introduces the history, the present situation and the latest development of the design. First of all, taking France as the source, it introduces France, Britain and Japan. The history of the establishment of the legal system of design in the United States and other major western countries. Then it introduces the system of intellectual property protection and the laws and regulations of design protection in China. In the second chapter, the problems of design protection are put forward, that is, the degree of innovation is not high, and the garbage patents which lack innovation point exist in large quantities. Then the main causes of the problem are analyzed. The third chapter analyzes the main body of the design tort judgment. First, it introduces the laws and regulations of the main body of the design tort adjudication in the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union and Japan, respectively. Combined with specific cases, this paper analyzes the choice of the main body of the design tort judgment under several special circumstances. The fourth chapter elaborates the standard of design tort judgment, mainly divided into confusion standard and innovation standard. This paper first cited Fiat's lawsuit against the Great Wall to analyze the shortcomings and shortcomings of the confusion standard, including vague connotation, lack of theoretical foothold and lack of social justice. Secondly, combined with the patent dispute between Supor and Jiuyang, the disadvantages of confusion standard and the superiority of innovation standard are further expounded. The fifth chapter puts forward some suggestions for the design infringement judgment, mainly including two points. Firstly, for different types of products, the main body of infringement judgment should be subdivided into non-daily items, buyers and users are different. Intermediate products. Secondly, in order to make up for the defects and shortcomings of the confusion standard, it is suggested that the confusion standard should be changed into the innovation standard gradually, and the innovation standard should be taken as the basis to judge whether the two standards are similar or not.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.42

【参考文献】