现有技术抗辩的法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-12-24 14:38

【摘要】：随着2008年第三次《专利法》的修改,现有技术抗辩被正式引入我国,为被控侵权人主张其实施的技术属于现有技术而免于承担侵权责任提供了法律依据。然而,这次修改只对现有技术抗辩进行了初步的规定,对于现有技术的范围、现有技术抗辩的适用范围和技术对比规则仍需进一步明确。第三人享有专利权的非自由公知技术满足现有技术的条件,可以作为现有技术抗辩的依据。此外,在抗辩时,现有技术应当限定为一项单独的、已有的技术。现有技术抗辩不仅适用于等同侵权,还适用于相同侵权的情形。对于已经公开的抵触申请,公众能够获知并实施其中所记载的技术,因此,它可以类推适用现有技术抗辩。现有技术抗辩是一种侵权例外抗辩,其适用的前提是侵权成立。因此,在技术对比时,应当先将被控侵权技术与涉案专利技术进行对比,构成侵权的情况下,再将被控侵权技术与现有技术进行对比。由于法院在判定专利侵权时采用的是"相同或等同"的标准,它能够适当扩大专利权的保护范围。为了同等程度地扩大现有技术抗辩的范围,实现专利权与公众使用现有技术的权利之间的平衡,采用"相同或等同"的标准判断现有技术抗辩是否成立更合理。
[Abstract]:With the revision of the third Patent Law in 2008, the existing technology defense was formally introduced into China, which provides a legal basis for the alleged infringer to claim that the technology implemented belongs to the existing technology and is exempt from tort liability. However, this revision only makes a preliminary stipulation on the defense of the existing technology, and the scope of application and the rules of contrast of the existing technology for the scope of the existing technology still need to be further clarified. The non-free public-known technology of which the third party has the patent right satisfies the condition of the existing technology and can be used as the basis of the defense of the existing technology. In addition, in the event of a defence, the existing art shall be limited to a separate, existing technology. The existing technology defense applies not only to the equivalent infringement, but also to the same infringement situation. For an application that has been made public, the public can be informed and implemented of the technology described therein, so that it can be applied by analogy to existing technology defences. The existing technology defense is one kind of tort exception defense, its application premise is the infringement establishment. Therefore, when the technology is compared, the technology of the alleged infringement should be compared with the technology involved in the patent first, and then, in the case of the infringement, the technology of the alleged infringement should be compared with the existing technology. Because the court adopts the "same or equivalent" standard in determining patent infringement, it can extend the scope of patent protection appropriately. In order to expand the scope of the existing technology defense to the same extent and achieve the balance between the patent right and the public's right to use the existing technology, the criterion of "same or equal" is adopted to judge whether the existing technology defense is more reasonable.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.42

【参考文献】